Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sher_panjabi

WEARING A KALGI ON THE PAGH?? Manmat or Gurmat

Recommended Posts

sher_panjabi    10

WEARING THE KALGI (PLUME) ON WEDDINGS

by Daas

Wearing a Kalgi (a plume) on one’s turban signifies that the person is a royal person, a king and a person with great responsibility and respect.

Unfortunately in recent years people have been following the practice of putting a Kalgi on the groom’s turban on the wedding day, which is ceremoniously removed in the Diwaan Hall in the Gurdwara Sahib by the groom’s sisters.

Is wearing a Kalgi in accordance to Gurmat, the Guru’s way?

Could you wear a Kalgi on your turban and walk inside the Golden Temple and not be stopped by fellow Sikhs or sewadaars?

Is wearing a Kalgi in the house of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, our

King who we call ‘Kalgiaa(n)vala’ (the one who wear’s the plume) not a great act of disrespect?

If the groom is a king like Guru Gobind Singh ji, then by all means wear a Kalgi on the turban.

If the groom can carry us across to Waheguru like Guru Gobind Singh Ji, then by all means wear a Kalgi on the turban.

If the groom can do the same things which Guru Gobind Singh Ji done, which makes him worthy of being called ‘the one with Kalgi’ then by all means wear a Kalgi on the turban.

We must address this issue and educate ourselves.

We must understand that people and not the Gurus start these practices.

We must take action to stop any form of disrespect to the Guru Granth Sahib Ji, the living speaking soul of the Ten Gurus.

Be inspired and inspire others.

May Vaheguru bless you.

manvir.khalsa@gmail.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
H4RPAL    5

Thank you for this post- this is something which has long bothered me. Additioanlly, there is also the fact that people are increasingly choosing to don red dastaars at weddings, any other colour is considered unusual. This custom of red dastaar is a hindu custom which originated at the time of the Mogul's, who forbid non-muslims to wear any colour turban but red, and even then only for special ceremonies (ie weddings). This is what the custom of red was developed in relation to. This tradition should therefore not apply to Sikhs who rejected such threats of the moguls, and were instructed to wear two dastaars after being told to not wear one, who built high takhats to dispbey orders not to do so, who in every which way rejected the laws of the Mogul's. In this manner, we degrade ourselves by wearing the red dastaars of slavery, and subservience to the moguls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pyara    287

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Why do monays grow a beard and wear a dastaar on their wedding day? Is that Manmat? At the end of the day everyone knows they are a monay, the family, friends and Guruji. So why do they try to look like a keshdari on their wedding? Strange if you ask me... grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do monays grow a beard and wear a dastaar on their wedding day? Is that Manmat? At the end of the day everyone knows they are a monay, the family, friends and Guruji. So why do they try to look like a keshdari on their wedding? Strange if you ask me... 

Strange if you ask anyone Pyara Ji......and I totally agree with Harpal on the red dastaar and wearing a kalgi......its pathetic!!!!

The Kalgi is only for the one King of Kings, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji

Dhan Dhan Kalgiaa(n)vala Pitha ^_^^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sher_panjabi    10

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Though it is odd and strange that mone keep a beard for the wedding and shave it straight away before the party and take off the pagh...

my view is...

for a mona to keep a beard and tie a pagh on his wedding day - can be a positive thing. It proves and shows the mona that he is capable of keeping kesh. when he gets his wedding photos developed and his photo is framed on the wall with him wearing a pagh on his wedding day - it will remind him and show him that he can do it! he can one day (if you wants to) keep sikhi saroop.

HOWEVER! I think mone should at least keep the beard and turban for the WHOLE DAY and not just for the morning and shave it off. The sudden shaving and taking off the pagh = disrespectful. It gives the impression that now the anand kaaraj is over, the boy is now free and happy without a pagh and beard, showing that he is handsome cleanshaven.

So my benti to mone veer jis would be please keep your beards and paghs for the whole day! :TH:

food for thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
H4RPAL    5

Thats quite an interesting point actually- the wedding will be one of the most days of a persons life, and wedding photos will be displayed in the house, and shown to everyone. So if someone is dressed as a keshdhari, there is certainly cause to see a positive. Wouldn't it be great if the kids of all such individuals upon seeing the wedding pictures asked "dad, what happened to your turban and beard?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Princess    2
vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Though it is odd and strange that mone keep a beard for the wedding and shave it straight away before the party and take off the pagh...

my view is...

for a mona to keep a beard and tie a pagh on his wedding day - can be a positive thing. It proves and shows the mona that he is capable of keeping kesh. when he gets his wedding photos developed and his photo is framed on the wall with him wearing a pagh on his wedding day - it will remind him and show him that he can do it! he can one day (if you wants to) keep sikhi saroop.

HOWEVER! I think mone should at least keep the beard and turban for the WHOLE DAY and not just for the morning and shave it off. The sudden shaving and taking off the pagh = disrespectful. It gives the impression that now the anand kaaraj is over, the boy is now free and happy without a pagh and beard, showing that he is handsome cleanshaven.

So my benti to mone veer jis would be please keep your beards and paghs for the whole day! :TH:

food for thought

i

agree

just a question tho

say is a mona didn't want to disrespect by growing beard n tieing a phaag for the wedding in the gurudwara what should he do? should he wear a patka to his wedding?

for most ppl these dayz wearin a phaag is just for looking all decked up on ur wedding day no?

just a thought tht crossed my mind n i wuz wondering what that guy should do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, it seems that any Sikh orgs that do speak out against what's happening in general that may have "some" shared views with those that seem to be not of the liberal/left persuasion is seen as an abomination by left wing Sikhs.  It leads to me to believe that you are clearly on the left of the political spectrum. There is nothing wrong in being on the left of the spectrum. However, the left of the spectrum these days which claim to be tolerant and inclusive except they are very selective as to whom they are tolerant towards. Now with the increase in muslim population has meant an increase in certain crimes such as organised street grooming and terrorism.  Now with these happening more often, people are beginning to find patterns for this. A lot of this rooted in Islamic ideology. The fact the likes of SYUK will speak out against this you don't like. The people who support the left of the political spectrum like the Islamists for some reason and tend to walk on egg shells around them.  However, people on the left of the political spectrum (like yourself I believe) won't think twice about attacking people who want to stand up to the intolerance.  The contradiction I find generally with the left is that they want full rights for gays yet at the same time want full Sharia law for muslims. The irony is that the muslims will attack the gays if given half the chance. Muslims will not show tolerance and the people on the left will not speak out.  If someone not of the left points this out, it is pointed out as hate speech and you are shouted down called islamophobic or racist.  The left want diversity, just not diversity of opinion. In the Communist countries, freedom of speech is not allowed. The left claims to be liberal but act in the same manner of Communist countries. Communism has it's origins in Marxism and I suspect the left are Marxists in disguise. They might not be in power politically but there is cultural subversion going on. It seems that you are clearly influenced by this type of thought. That is why I suggested that you may be a Cultural Marxist.  I provided a link from the Telegraph to show what is happening in universities that has been overwhelmed by leftist though is now doing no platform which means freedom of speech is being curtailed.  This is cultural marxism taking over. However, if it is Islamic hate speech it is accepted. Your stance against SYUK seems to suggest that you are accepting of Islamist hate speech but not of people who would fight against it like Tommy Robinson.  I think the problem Sikhs on left of the political spectrum is that they think Sikhi somehow is the same as this leftist thought. It is not. They are influenced by the left (which is influenced by Marxism ) more so than Sikhi. That is why I called you a Cultural Marxist.  If you feel that is not articulated enough for you I can go on and on and on. The problem with your thought process is that it may eventually lead into a totaliterian system.  Totalitarianism is the antisesis of Sikhi.  
    • Our life is so short. We have so many constraints and chains. Remembering Bhai Sahib's beautiful life accomplishments as a Gursikh.
    • This is what I was referring to... 
    • Avoiding what my brother?  It appears to me that you use such labels as 'cultural marxist' without having a clear definition of what it is.. Please in your own words explain.. What examples have you provided of evidence of my indoctrination?  Using content produced by others just suggests to me that you don't really know what you are talking about... I'm sure you do... But without explicitly articulating your assertion, quite frankly it seems like you are more comfortable in being a sycophant than having your own opinions..  With all due respect  S
    • It's a reply to the other poster. He was mentioning that there are not enough sangat that attends the gurdwara but when we drilled down into the specifics. There are more people in the langar hall than the darbar.
×