Jump to content

Surrey Nagar Kirtan - Ahmediya Muslim Stall


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

What he means is if the dark days of the 80s and 90s are, somehow, visited upon Sikhs who are now settled in the West individuals such as yourself would be content to see Sikhs dominated and cornered by the followers of a certain religion for whom domination and subjugation of the other is a fundamental requirement. In fact, put the mad mullahs to one side: if whites suddenly grew a conscience and a backbone and decided to give the visibly ethnic in their lands a bit of "what-for," you'd be upset to see us defend ourselves. You don't like Sikh strength. It upsets you. You seem to enjoy the idea of Sikhs being rudderless, demoralised, disorganised, and ultimately useless.

In the utopian vision of the world that's playing out in your head, such dark events could never happen and if they somehow do, Sikhs -- as you seem to have always implicitly skirted around the edges of suggesting without ever nailing your colours to the mast for as long as you've been posting on this forum -- should never assert and defend themselves, because that would lead to a form of Sikh unity, and for some reason the thought of such an idea is apparently anathema to you.

I believe in asserting myself and the principles of gurbani, defending them when challenged. 'Sikh unity' is not anathema to me.. In fact quite the opposite.. I believe in uniting around the core principles of sikhi.. Your idea of 'sikh unity' is predicated on creating and manufacturing a identity which is about political and cultural identity.. For me guru nanak expressed dur ki bani that transcends such narrow things.. 

I absolutely reject your analysis that I believe in being rudderless, quite the opposite I believe as Tisarpanth we are bestowed upon us and have guardianship of a something that even in our darkest hours we still have to resist falling in to lazy politics.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2018 at 8:58 PM, jkvlondon said:

doesn't prevent them from converting peeps and also working towards the ummah , don't be too complacent

This <banned word filter activated> is out of his sampradaic <banned word filter activated> mind- leave him to rot in his own misery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use