Jump to content

War In Syria


singh598
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Syrian government have been at war with rival guerrilla groups seeking to overthrow President Assad.

Iran and Russia has supported the Government and previously Kurdish guerrillas and the USA have defeated Islamic State.

So what are the sangats view with the recent attack on Syria Government targets.

Is the supposed use of chemical weapons justifiable for UK, France and the USA to potentially trigger WW3 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Unfortunate situation, loss of civilian lives will be significant. All for the game of geopolitics. I'm curious who will back down first, US or Russia? 

 

Oh and ISIS defeat was more due to Russian and Assad actions, not USA.

It seems like it's a confrontation now, with USA saying they shall attack again should Syria use chemical weapons.  This will lead to shooting down of missiles 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2018 at 7:47 AM, singh598 said:

The Syrian government have been at war with rival guerrilla groups seeking to overthrow President Assad.

Iran and Russia has supported the Government and previously Kurdish guerrillas and the USA have defeated Islamic State.

So what are the sangats view with the recent attack on Syria Government targets.

Is the supposed use of chemical weapons justifiable for UK, France and the USA to potentially trigger WW3 

All false flag staged events for the benefit of Israel since its creation and most large islamic terrorist attacks can be traced back to abrahamic saudi-israel nexus. waaahaabi Saudi and jewish israelis are abrahamic cousins they want to work together overtly to fight their common enemies more than ever now (shia yeman huthi's, shia hezbollah lebanon, shia syria and shia iran). By using the western powers to carry out attacks at the behest of their national interests. UK, USA, France,etc are puppets in the pay of neo-con zionists banksters. If the western governments didnt do what the banksters wanted they would crash their economies and get the other members of the NATO gang to bully them by force into submission.

It's all a drama about so called chemical attacks and a show at the UN the real agenda is oil pipe lines and geo-political control and influence of that area.

Putin's Russia is a wimp and crap ally in the face of western hostility, it allowed attacks by israel and the west to go unanswered, its not really defending its ally syria. It's letting it get attacked and bullied for its own economic self interest probably waiting for the syrian government to buy its weapon products and services out of desperation rather offering it for free as a true friend.

There is very little chance of a world war unless the west or israel does something stupid and attacks russian military warships or bases. Then the public in Russia will probably call for revenge which could escalate into a deadlier and wider global conflict

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPNWEY44NY&bpctr=1523827155

The 2nd youtube link is particularly interesting (it has embedded and certain features disabled by youtube so you need to click on it)

Of all the videos I had watched of 9/11 and research I had done, I never knew there was 5 dancing celebrating israeli's caught by fbi in new york on 9/11 cheering on the attacks. They had rented a truck with mural of twin towers getting attacked by a plane. This is highly suspicious and seems to suggest israeli mossad agents either carried out 9/11 or had prior knowledge and wanted the event to happen and make it ever worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My views, there is no such thing as stopping terrorists, it's like cancer. We can have wars as long as we live :( to dampen it down/ keep things under control. Second, WW3 created by terrorists? Highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use