Jump to content

Why do people doubt jhatka and Sukha when there are vast amounts of evidence stating Sikhs practiced both?


Nihang96k
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Why would he have consulted with a group that was largely already useless and allied with his and the kaums enemies. The Nihangs that did want to be useful joined on their individual discretion. Wasn't Santa bragging he should have been sent in instead of the army? 

That might be the case, still as someone who kept rehit, no way he'd be happy with the attack. Btw, I'm not pro Santa by any stretch of the imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, s50 said:

SNAKES.

 

Santa Singh was excommunicated from the Panth in 1986. 

Baba Santa Singh chose Congress over the panth and had the sewa of Sri Akaal Takht Sahib funded by the same government that had once destroyed it. The true singhs of Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj did not like this cowardly manoeuvre and on 26th January 1986 Sarbat Khalsa, the Jathedar Baba Thakur Singh Ji himself gave the leadership of the Budha Dal to Bhai Amrik Singh Jaura and tied him the dastar. It was also on this day that the sewa of Sri Akaal Takht Sahib was recommenced, but this time entirely by the Saadh Sangat.

 

Santa Singh should have never been Jathedaar again of the Budha Dal even after he came back into the Panth. Todays Dals are in total shambles. 

 

Note. Bhai Amrik Singh Jaura was a Great Freedom Fighter who worked with Bhai Avtar Singh Brahma.

 

 

Amrik Singh Jaura did the seva on fake nihang kahana aswell (an action which is widely said to be done by shaheed sukhdev singh sakeera)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BhForce said:

 

2) When the attack on Darbar Sahib Complex happened, it was seen by Baba Santa Singh as a sign from God, and he was happy about it, since it was the fulfillment of a prophesied event when the control of the Akal Takhat would be returned to the Nihangs.

I would say seen as a sign from Akaal or Waheguru. Not God - we aren't christians here, this is sikhsangat =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

So if we bring in sukha whose gonna stop the youngsters from frying their brains out?

Everybody looks down on amlis. No matter if they nihang or not. 

Stop trying to make sikh ppl puratan. It would mean living on the land without jobs like nihangs do. It is very commendable and will be very beneficial to have these survival skills in the panth. They will be needed if electricity gives out or mayhem descends. But the whole panth shouldnt become like that. We need ppl in the highest positions, knowing abt the most modern science and weapons. 

No, bhang and sukhnidaan would replace the alcoholism, so it would be better! But none of this silly weed stuff.

Also more of the panth needs the warrior and survival skills; 1984 and 1947 karma happened to us because we lost the skills due to SGPC and jatehbandis' rehits

4 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Bob, just hearing that name makes me chuckle. He still thinks he's a student when that time for him passed in the early 90s...fool and full of the brown stuff.

sikhs are always students? If a sikh stops learning then there's a problem!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Yes, but Guru Granth Sahib uses names for the One interchangeably doesn't it? Because one can only refer to the One in any language. 

too many abrahmic connotations with the term God. Plus it doesn't sit well with the monistic and nirguna-sarguna approach where the different defitions are used, such as Chandi, MahaKaal, Akaal, Waheguru, Har, Ram etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

lol maybe I do mean what you mean?! but obviously being a student I didn't mean what you meant obviously!

I feel sorry for his wife/ bachey, if he's still married that is, he was always out attempting to preach/doss. Obviously he's not all bad as he was involved in setting up the original Boss camps and does have a level of shardha but wants the attention to go alongside and, hasn't clocked his time to leave the student scene is loooong overdue. End of the day everyone has strengths and weaknesses ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use