Jump to content

Understanding the deeper meaning behind "Do not say that the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran are false. Those who do not contemplate them are false."


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, singh598 said:

Donot call the Vedas and Ketabas false, false is he who doesn't dwell upon the teachings within these.

That makes no sense from a point of Gurmat. Just think about it, none of the Abrahamic texts or the Vedas were written by the founders. Also, since Sikhi is against a lot of stuff in their core beliefs anyways, why would it say to contemplate upon its teachings when the core concepts are against Gurmat? 

If you plant a bad seed, no matter how well you take care of it, you will get bad fruit. This is why when the Guru re-defines what a “true Muslim” is in Gurbani, god deffinition is fundamentally different from what is officially accepted by all the Islamic schools of thought today. 

There is a specific reason the path of the Sikh Dharma was re-established in Kal Yug by the form of the Guru known as Guru Nanak Dev Ji, otherwise the Guru could have just reformed any of the other faiths. The reason Sikhi came was because the fundamental bases that the others were built upon were not solid in acordance to Gurmat. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is already been discussed until cows traveled all over the earth and back check the search archives..lol. I won't say much as my brain hurts having to explain and deconstructing like i've done in the past. Just don't have that energy now.

But here is the video of sant hari singh ji randhawale just like his predecessors-sant gyani gurbachan singh bhindranwale holding the gurmat position on vedas. It's explain vedas have karam, upasana, gyan. There are 80,000 useless shaloks of Karam listed there, Upasana listed there but at the end it talks about gyan- ekta of jiv and bhram (atma gyan), it has 4000 shaloks of atma gyan which is pretty consistent with gurmat advait. Those 4000 shaloks are in vedas further commentary of those shaloks in upanishads and vedant

Here is gurmat position anyalsis on vedas by sant gyani gurbachan singh bhindranwale from japji sahib teeka

 

5aa000477cb0a_mahavakinvedasandgurbani.jpg.b02a399404944c1bdaefeb36a69e3cfe.jpgmahavaks.JPG.b5f0893b9ffce544f093c8f43f1da7f9.JPG

 

5aa00156073ed_gurbanitakeonvedas.JPG.82fc909cc66dabd54ef58616f2e4267c.JPG5aa0015b41b5b_gurbanitakeonvedas2.JPG.f1dac3c0946129604298582c539b9827.JPG5aa001612b905_gurbanitakeonvedaspage3.JPG.87ded864e7ba0eaebec009812d4d2a49.JPG5aa00166af6ea_gurbanitakeonvedaspage4.JPG.eac3e1c645bc142451d736442b2f4a45.JPG5aa0016be3334_gurbanitakeonvedaspage5.JPG.062e23c524e7e2c66dd4c5cdd790a6a7.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandukya Upanishad. Turiya is discussed in Verse 7 of the Mandukya Upanishad; however, the idea is found in the oldest Upanishads. For example, Chapters 8.7 through 8.12 of Chandogya Upanishad discuss the "four states of consciousness" as awake, dream-filled sleep, deep sleep, and beyond deep sleep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you please link me to previous posts on this topic? Every time I search, I get 0 results for some reason. 

Also, I really don’t like the attitude a lot of posters have here, they don’t go into depth and deal with specific points, they just repeat what baba (insert name here) said and accept it as the 100% truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheeTurbanator said:

Can you please link me to previous posts on this topic? Every time I search, I get 0 results for some reason. 

Also, I really don’t like the attitude a lot of posters have here, they don’t go into depth and deal with specific points, they just repeat what baba (insert name here) said and accept it as the 100% truth. 

Detailed analysis given in the screenshots, if it resonates with you great if it doesn't thats great too.

     

http://www.sikhawareness.com/topic/10748-a-requested-clarification-about-gurmat/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, just a quick question for you since your already here: 

In regards to the concept of free will (or lack there of) how come in Japji Sahib it tells us that we reap what we sow (ape beej ape khao) but then a few tuks layer says that we do not have the “jor” or power to do anything. 

My friend thinks that humans have free will and that what separates them from animals is their intellect, however he interprets “hukam” as laws of nature (gravity, etc) and advocates the notion “we” have free will. 

How would you proceed with this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Also, just a quick question for you since your already here:

In regards to the concept of free will (or lack there of) how come in Japji Sahib it tells us that we reap what we sow (ape beej ape khao) but then a few tuks layer says that we do not have the “jor” or power to do anything.

 


According to my understanding, ape beej ape khao bachan is matter of doer ship, if you do the actions with doership*/indentity/ego then cycle of karma ensues then you will get fruit based on those actions. But if you allow actions spontaneously coming directly from consciousness then its direct expression of that consciousness-vahiguru- everything is expression of divine. Sukhmani sahib talks about this over and over again - how vahiguru is doing everything, enjoying, expressing itself. There is only one and there is no one besides one.

Regarding- Akhan jor gurbani vak- it alludes to the point there is no free will everything is per-odained- you can will what you want but you cannot will what you will which means backdrop of everything is pre-determined*.

Doership*

Ang-278

ਜਬ ਇਹ ਜਾਨੈ ਮੈ ਕਿਛੁ ਕਰਤਾ ॥
जब इह जानै मै किछु करता ॥
Jab ih jānai mai kicẖẖ karṯā.
As long as this mortal thinks that he is the one who does things,

ਤਬ ਲਗੁ ਗਰਭ ਜੋਨਿ ਮਹਿ ਫਿਰਤਾ ॥
तब लगु गरभ जोनि महि फिरता ॥
Ŧab lag garabẖ jon mėh firṯā.
he shall wander in reincarnation through the womb.


*Pre-determined

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqLDWyk1uLQ

Science experiment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ4nwTTmcgs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, N30S1NGH said:

This topic is already been discussed until cows traveled all over the earth and back check the search archives..lol. I won't say much as my brain hurts having to explain and deconstructing like i've done in the past. Just don't have that energy now.

But here is the video of sant hari singh ji randhawale just like his predecessors-sant gyani gurbachan singh bhindranwale holding the gurmat position on vedas. It's explain vedas have karam, upasana, gyan. There are 80,000 useless shaloks of Karam listed there, Upasana listed there but at the end it talks about gyan- ekta of jiv and bhram (atma gyan), it has 4000 shaloks of atma gyan which is pretty consistent with gurmat advait. Those 4000 shaloks are in vedas further commentary of those shaloks in upanishads and vedant

Here is gurmat position anyalsis on vedas by sant gyani gurbachan singh bhindranwale from japji sahib teeka

 

5aa000477cb0a_mahavakinvedasandgurbani.jpg.b02a399404944c1bdaefeb36a69e3cfe.jpgmahavaks.JPG.b5f0893b9ffce544f093c8f43f1da7f9.JPG

 

5aa00156073ed_gurbanitakeonvedas.JPG.82fc909cc66dabd54ef58616f2e4267c.JPG5aa0015b41b5b_gurbanitakeonvedas2.JPG.f1dac3c0946129604298582c539b9827.JPG5aa001612b905_gurbanitakeonvedaspage3.JPG.87ded864e7ba0eaebec009812d4d2a49.JPG5aa00166af6ea_gurbanitakeonvedaspage4.JPG.eac3e1c645bc142451d736442b2f4a45.JPG5aa0016be3334_gurbanitakeonvedaspage5.JPG.062e23c524e7e2c66dd4c5cdd790a6a7.JPG

The above katha does not say vedas are satguru or take a person to satguru.  Gurbani says the vedas don't know the fourth state and Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji does wonderful katha on this.  

Learning to accept Gurbani for some has been a on going struggle because they don't let go of their own beliefs.  

In the past this poster has presented Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji katha in audio form where the audio was cut to give a misrepresentation of Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji katha.  So be very very careful when reading this poster's post.  The person who cut the audio is know on this site by poster @kam1825.  I addressed both of them and they did not even want to acknowledge there wrong doing and stuck to their manmat ways.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use