Jump to content
Dsinghdp

Hindu decrease in India

Recommended Posts

Hinduism is decreasing day by day in India. RSS and Shiv Sena are going crazy. More and more Dalits are leaving Hinduism (many have become Muslims). Only our great Guru Tegh Bahadur saved Dharma and Sanskrit in Hindustan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Kira said:

any source?

Hindus were 83% and now the religious census of India shows they are close to 75%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Dsinghdp said:

Hinduism is decreasing day by day in India. RSS and Shiv Sena are going crazy. More and more Dalits are leaving Hinduism (many have become Muslims). Only our great Guru Tegh Bahadur saved Dharma and Sanskrit in Hindustan.

IT's not called hinduism. There are so many dharmik panths and folk traditions which hindustanis/Bharatis follow. It is not hindu"ism", that's colonial/gora mentality to call it a religion....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Dsinghdp said:

Hinduism is decreasing day by day in India. RSS and Shiv Sena are going crazy. More and more Dalits are leaving Hinduism (many have become Muslims). Only our great Guru Tegh Bahadur saved Dharma and Sanskrit in Hindustan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

this is the price they are paying for aghiratghana , they are now becoming what Guru ji saved them from.  RSS are thugs who are majority criminals already; over 8 members of BJP cabinet have active criminal cases against them including one being investigated for murder.

Dalits were never considered part of the Dharma according to such thugs only they exist for serving the Brahmins as slaves and should feel thankful for that. So the 80 percent of who are claimed by Hindu propagandists are not hindus by the fact of their treatment and denial of knowledge of the faith/s. So India was never really 'Hindu' dominant it was lacking in dharma generally...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

IT's not called hinduism. There are so many dharmik panths and folk traditions which hindustanis/Bharatis follow. It is not hindu"ism", that's colonial/gora mentality to call it a religion....

Meanwhile, bro, the average Hindu on the street, when asked what what religion/dharam/mazhab he belongs to will say "I am a Hindu". The term is used in the Constitution of India (Hindu religion).

If the basic law of the country uses the terminology of Hindu religion, why do you feel the need to object? It's like trying to be more Catholic than the Pope. The Sikhs, Muslims, or Christians did not impose the Constitution on the Hindus, the latter imposed it on the former.

Just wondering, how do you define "ism"?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Meanwhile, bro, the average Hindu on the street, when asked what what religion/dharam/mazhab he belongs to will say "I am a Hindu". The term is used in the Constitution of India (Hindu religion).

If the basic law of the country uses the terminology of Hindu religion, why do you feel the need to object? It's like trying to be more Catholic than the Pope. The Sikhs, Muslims, or Christians did not impose the Constitution on the Hindus, the latter imposed it on the former.

Just wondering, how do you define "ism"?

fact is the majority of the law is inherited from angrez they changed very little thus hindu ...and stupid sloganeering such Hindu Hindi Hindusthan

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Muslims made a huge mistake by creating Pakistan in 1947. Had Pakistan not been created, today Indian sub continental Muslim population would have been close to 550 million and that number is set to grow. India's Hindus are not aggressive nor strong enough to handle so many Muslims. What partition did was to cut the Muslim population down to size. Size small enough that the Hindus can handle.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their population is decreasing as a percentage because the muslims are breeding so fast and there is illegal immigration from Bangladesh. That is the main reason not due to mass conversions

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CharhdiKala said:

Their population is decreasing as a percentage because the muslims are breeding so fast and there is illegal immigration from Bangladesh. That is the main reason not due to mass conversions

This is what the rss don't want us to know, the hindu population is losing its will to expand (much like us right now) and their fertility plummets. Our muslim freinds on the other hand have the energy to want to spread so they keep pumping out babies (though their rate is slowing down as well). Our kaum should definitely start having at least 3 kids a family.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its mainly because the Muslims have a very high birth rate. Slums in India are full of millions of muslims with each couple having around 11 kids. Also christian missionaries are converting Hindus especially in the South and North East. I think Hindus are soon going to become a minority in Kerala. This is really bugging the Hindu extremist parties so they are going around with this program called "ghar wapsi" which aims to convert Muslim/Christian Indians back to Hinduism. In some villages 100s of Muslims/Christians have become Hindus. But India has seen a rise in Hindu nationalism in recent years especially in northern areas like Uttar Pradesh. Hindus are actually becoming more and more intolerant of Muslims and Christians which can clearly be seen in states like UP. A yogi guy was also elected in UP as the CM. Uttar pradesh has also removed the Taj Mahal from its official tourism booklet. In Utar pradesh they also have "moral police" who make sure no girls are walking around wearing jeans etc. I think India will have communal riots again very soon. 

Edited by puzzled
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2018 at 7:30 PM, jkvlondon said:

fact is the majority of the law is inherited from angrez they changed very little thus hindu ...and stupid sloganeering such Hindu Hindi Hindusthan

Well, yes, it is true that when India transition away from British control, the law was not changed suddenly (such as the law on contracts, negotiable instruments, societies, companies, the Indian Penal Code, etc.).

But the Constitution of India was not "inherited from angrez". It was created by Hindus, and they specifically use the term "Hindu" in regards to Hindu religion in the Constitution.

@ipledgeblue, waiting for your response to my post above, bro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×