Jump to content

So Jagmeet gets married ....


jkvlondon
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

You make a great point.  I remember when I was a kid.  You'd see a clean shaven Sikh uncle, and almost without exception, his wife would still have uncut hair tied in a bun.

That was preferable, I think. If the dad's a mona who drinks, that's bad, but still the mother can tell the kids "don't drink, don't cut your hair". (It doesn't work in reverse.) Meanwhile, the Gurdwara gianis can then reinforce that teaching with katha on Sikh rehit and ethics.

The problem is, the Gurdwara gianis never got around to talking about why we shouldn't drink or cut our hair, because the committees didn't allow them to do that. The moment somebody would say don't cut your hair, they'd get sacked from Gurdwara employment, because the committee was monas, as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/02/2018 at 5:05 PM, BhForce said:

Have you considered that maybe on this one special day, he didn't want to "bike" to his wedding? I thought people were criticizing him for marrying a non-Amritdhari. That is warranted. To begrudge him not having a super-simple wedding is not warranted.

I suppose you're also upset that he and his bride wore finery on this one special day instead of khaddar (homespun cotton)? If they wanted to wear khaddar, that's fine, too, but they didn't, and that's fine, too. Compared to what some brides wear, her clothes are extremely conservative: no cleavage, no bare midriff, no arms even. What's the problem?

What you're saying would have some import in context. The fact is whenever there's a wedding among our people, rows upon rows of airplanes are filled with people flying out (or in). If that were not the case, then your complaining about Jagmeet Singh's airplane ride would have an impact, but it doesn't.

Huh? Then on what basis?

Are you serious? What are you even talking about? Did you not see the pictures @jkvlondon posted here? Just so there's no misunderstanding, here's the actual wedding pic (attached).

I ask you again: She's wearing a chunni (on her head, not around her as a fashion accessory on her shoulders). What else do you want?

jagmeetsinghwedding.jpg

Marrying a patit is not a special day.  The special day he should have paid attention to was when he took Amrit from the Punj pyare and told her 5 years ago, take Amrit or I'm gone.  He lied to the public by pretending to be worried about the environment by driving a bicycle.  He got engaged to a patit woman and throw everything good out of the window.  

Anyone who has the ability to use social media has seen she is not an amritdhari.

Also answer my questions.   

 If she was concerned about covering her head even not in the presence of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, then how come during the proposal she has her hair open and uncovered? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

I get what you saying bro but Gursikhs should in theory be pakkeh in their own thing than to be swayed by one individual. I get gursikh women feel they be shunned, but even if he married one gursikh girl, he wouldnt have married the remainder. the guys had a love marriage with someone who he actually loves, and like i said before, gotta rate the girl for not rejecting him due to his sikhi saroop. bigger issue here is that all the haters are appearing to be jelous and on the nindiyah bandwagon.

Why would anyone want to marry a patit woman in the first place.  According to Gurbani she is an ugly woman.  Only insecure men want these type of woman in and are scared around these women.  

He loved a patit woman.  When the insecure boys can't find anything to say, the other person is jealous.  Jealous of what, he married a patit woman who dances around revealing her body and has no sense of Gurbani.  She sings filthy Punjabi music for fun.  Only a fool would marry such a woman.  Smart men who don't care about religion will mess around with these type of girls and give them the boot once they are bored.  

Learn the definition of nindiya (slander).  

Also he's a patit now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, garch said:

Nindiya = people in glass houses throwing stones

 

This singh probably does more good then all of us put together. hes obviously no Saint but he's on the right path.

maharaj bless him and the rest of us strength to become a better and stronger singhs then we already are.

so many SJWs on here. The dude's done more than me, I'll give him props for that.  Chalo, I'm sure a-lot of the critics are better people than everyone here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

@Akalifauj

Dude. She'd have to be Amritdhari to be patit. Make up your mind already. 

So either way you cut it, what you're doing is nindya. 

It's either slander she isn't amritdhari or slander she's patit. So you pick which burden you're choosing to carry. 

You're also in no position to declare anyone patit. 

My advice to you is get yourself in order. 

Learn the definition of patit.  She and now jagmeet Singh are patit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use