Jump to content
GurjantGnostic

Veer MrDoaba ji, wellness check

Recommended Posts

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh. 

Does anyone know veer ji personally?  Are we able to vouch for his wellbeing?

Probably nothing but it seems out of character for him to be gone since last wednesday. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WJKK WJKF

He is hanging around in Keshdari Hindu Darbar Asthaan.

Converting everyone to sanatanism.

WJKK WJKF

Edited by monatosingh
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh. 

Does anyone know veer ji personally?  Are we able to vouch for his wellbeing?

Probably nothing but it seems out of character for him to be gone since last wednesday. 

He’s probably just having a break. Few other members have just disappeared, so they’re busy maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is doing dirty things with girls and guys with his salotar

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Singh123456777 said:

He is doing dirty things with girls and guys with his salotar

you have a dirty mind. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VJKK VJKF Ji

Hmm... MrDoaba has never been well per say... He's just having a break though. Spending his time wisely. Entertaining kaamdeva and his ਤੋਤਾ. I'll pass on your concerns, though I'm afraid he won't hear them for the brown RSS kashera he's managed to stuff in his ears. Hare ਓਮ.

On a real though, he's fine. ਏਨੀ ਛੇਤੀ ਨੀ ਖੇੜਾ ਛੁਟਣ ਵਾਲਾ l

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, simran345 said:

He’s probably just having a break. Few other members have just disappeared, so they’re busy maybe.

Hello penji. When there are troll posts most of us hibernate to do aome Naam jap

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

Hello penji. When there are troll posts most of us hibernate to do aome Naam jap

Hi penji, I don’t understand, troll posts? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Hi penji, I don’t understand, troll posts? 

Wge  When people post messagws abd peoblems just to tease.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh. 

Does anyone know veer ji personally?  Are we able to vouch for his wellbeing?

Probably nothing but it seems out of character for him to be gone since last wednesday. 

Aaww are you suffering from withdrawal symptoms. 

Koina, when he's back with a vengeance you'll be eating what remains of his salotar, we know where that's been 🤢

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, InderjitS said:

...clean?

no just filthy. Stop sl8tshaming my fellow RSS agent :((

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Kira said:

no just filthy. Stop sl8tshaming my fellow RSS agent :((

No one more vile,  part time rss ajant and Mr Nihang have a peculiar fascination with the brown stuff, rest of us are mere innocent spectators.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not quibbling over the import of the word "disassociate". What I'm saying is that your statement implied that if your husband (or wife) becomes an atheist you can divorce him.  And I said that that is specifically disallowed in Canon Law. On the other hand, if you were non-Christians in the first place, and you become a Christian, and your husband/wife divorces you, you have not violated anything if you remarry. But: If you were non-Christians in the first place, and you become a Christian, and your husband/wife does not divorce you, you cannot divorce him/her in Canon Law.
    • well bro what does disassociate mean to you ...I heard seperation of ways , but also I understood it to be a grey area since canon law still maintains that they are married despite the dharmic arth of the instruction..
    • hobson's choice , if you have a preselected array who have blessing from on high by centre there is NO choice only eyewash ....even Kejriwal showed his true colours when he didn't oppose the transfer of Jaggi to Tihar Jail
    • Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa. Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh! Often times I hear people say "SGGSJ doesnt say (insert topic) so it must be ok", and in the case of pre-marital sexual relations a dear friend of mine has made the same argument. My friend (non khalsa) argues that Bani specifically condemns rape, adultery, and polygamy, however isnt against sex outside of marriage, provided that both are not married to anyone, and have given consent. My friend likes to disregard anything outside SGGSJ.  He brings up tuks from Gurbani that specifically mention "others wives" to support the argument that its specifically about adultery, however I would argue, the English translation is very shallow, and in the context of Bani, "others wives" is also talking about anyone who isnt your wife, and isnt limited to adultery, but also anyone who isnt married.  Example 1:  Siri  Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 274 ਪਰ ਤ੍ਰਿਅ ਰੂਪੁ ਨ ਪੇਖੈ ਨੇਤ੍ਰ ॥ Par Thria Roop N Paekhai Naethr || ਪਰ means other ਤ੍ਰਿਅ means wife
        Example 2:  Siri  Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 1013
      ਇਸਤ੍ਰੀ ਤਜਿ ਕਰਿ ਕਾਮਿ ਵਿਆਪਿਆ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਇਆ ਪਰ ਨਾਰੀ ॥
      Abandoning his own wife, he is engrossed in sexual desire; his thoughts are on the wives of others.   Context:  Its not just talking just about adultery, the English translations are limiting, generally the concept is to not covet another wife, in the context of Bani, doesn't mean you can have sexual relations with women who are not married. Our rehat and history make it clear that one cannot have any sexual relations outside of marriage. There is a specific reason the Guru had 10 forms over 200 years, it was to show Sikhs how to live and practically apply Bani, otherwise the SGGSJ would have been all compiled by Guru Nanak and there would be no long history of the Guru in his many forms.    The SGGSJ isnt a rule book, and isnt going to specifically ban everything that we know is immoral. Where in SGGS Ji does it say that Sri Guru Har Rai Sahib Ji was the 7th Guru Sahib after Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji? Why would a primary Sikh text not name him?  In terms of Gurbani, when taken into context, and even compared to rehat and our history, its clear that sexual relations outside of marriage are discouraged.    Do you agree with my argument? These are just a few tuks I decided to bring up, if anyone has any more, please feel free to share! 
    • Badal out, badnaam in...why do people vote so badly or 
×