Jump to content

Veer MrDoaba ji, wellness check

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

Wge  When people post messagws abd peoblems just to tease.

Oh ok. 

Edited by simran345

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fateh di saanjh pao...Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!!! Sada Jai Bhagauti!!!

ਅੱਜ ਰਾਮ ਮੇਰੇ ਘਰ ਆਏ...ਮੇਰੇ ਕੁਟੀਆ ਦੇ ਭਾਗ ਜਗਾਏ।

ਉਹ ਜਗ ਦਾ ਪਾਲਣਹਾਰਾ ਨਾਲੇ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਰਖਵਾਲਾ।

ਅੱਜ ਰਾਮ ਮੇਰੇ ਘਰ ਆਏ...


On 12/02/2018 at 5:56 AM, GurjantGnostic said:

Does anyone know veer ji personally?  Are we able to vouch for his wellbeing?

Veere, I am well, thank you. I appreicate your concern! Maharaaj Kirpa!

On 12/02/2018 at 8:16 AM, monatosingh said:

He is hanging around in Keshdari Hindu Darbar Asthaan.

Converting everyone to sanatanism.

This is an extremely accurate observation.

I am the Pradhaan of Kesdhari Hindu Sabha, Doaba Region.

On 12/02/2018 at 8:17 AM, simran345 said:

He’s probably just having a break. Few other members have just disappeared, so they’re busy maybe.

ਭੈਣੇ! ਦੂਰੋਂ ਸਾਰੇ ਤਮਾਸ਼ੇ ਦੇਖਦਾ ਸ

On 12/02/2018 at 8:18 AM, Singh559 said:

He is doing bhagti in his bhora right now.

Raam Raam!!

On 12/02/2018 at 8:21 AM, Singh123456777 said:

He is doing dirty things with girls and guys with his salotar

Not sure what flavour shardaayi we'll end with this time if I'm completely honest....

ਜੋ ਵੀ ਬੰਨਿਆ...ਔਖਾ ਸੌਖਾ ਪੀਣਾ ਪੈਣਾ

On 12/02/2018 at 10:26 AM, S4NGH said:

Hmm... MrDoaba has never been well per say... He's just having a break though. Spending his time wisely. Entertaining kaamdeva and his ਤੋਤਾ. I'll pass on your concerns, though I'm afraid he won't hear them for the brown RSS kashera he's managed to stuff in his ears. Hare ਓਮ.

Kaamdev and his parrot...in my defence, Maryada doesn't explicitly state that I cannot associate with him! :grin

On 12/02/2018 at 2:45 PM, InderjitS said:

Koina, when he's back with a vengeance you'll be eating what remains of his salotar, we know where that's been 🤢

Hello sir, may I interest you in an exotic flavoured glass of shardaayi?

On 12/02/2018 at 4:13 PM, Kira said:

no just filthy. Stop sl8tshaming my fellow RSS agent :((

Thank you! At least someone still has some loyalty! Haven't done a very good job at corrupting these lot in my absence, they've reverted back to kattarvaadi.

On 12/02/2018 at 5:04 PM, GurjantGnostic said:

Glad things are well. As long as he didn't get a bag over his head in Hindustan. Heh

ਫੇਰ ਭੀ ਦਿਲ ਹੈ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ!

Edited by MrDoaba
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How lucky to get a visit from Raam himself.  I got a visit from the in laws who invite themselves to sleep over and we could not even protest coz they are our parents after all.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not quibbling over the import of the word "disassociate". What I'm saying is that your statement implied that if your husband (or wife) becomes an atheist you can divorce him.  And I said that that is specifically disallowed in Canon Law. On the other hand, if you were non-Christians in the first place, and you become a Christian, and your husband/wife divorces you, you have not violated anything if you remarry. But: If you were non-Christians in the first place, and you become a Christian, and your husband/wife does not divorce you, you cannot divorce him/her in Canon Law.
    • well bro what does disassociate mean to you ...I heard seperation of ways , but also I understood it to be a grey area since canon law still maintains that they are married despite the dharmic arth of the instruction..
    • hobson's choice , if you have a preselected array who have blessing from on high by centre there is NO choice only eyewash ....even Kejriwal showed his true colours when he didn't oppose the transfer of Jaggi to Tihar Jail
    • Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa. Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh! Often times I hear people say "SGGSJ doesnt say (insert topic) so it must be ok", and in the case of pre-marital sexual relations a dear friend of mine has made the same argument. My friend (non khalsa) argues that Bani specifically condemns rape, adultery, and polygamy, however isnt against sex outside of marriage, provided that both are not married to anyone, and have given consent. My friend likes to disregard anything outside SGGSJ.  He brings up tuks from Gurbani that specifically mention "others wives" to support the argument that its specifically about adultery, however I would argue, the English translation is very shallow, and in the context of Bani, "others wives" is also talking about anyone who isnt your wife, and isnt limited to adultery, but also anyone who isnt married.  Example 1:  Siri  Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 274 ਪਰ ਤ੍ਰਿਅ ਰੂਪੁ ਨ ਪੇਖੈ ਨੇਤ੍ਰ ॥ Par Thria Roop N Paekhai Naethr || ਪਰ means other ਤ੍ਰਿਅ means wife
        Example 2:  Siri  Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Ang 1013
      ਇਸਤ੍ਰੀ ਤਜਿ ਕਰਿ ਕਾਮਿ ਵਿਆਪਿਆ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਇਆ ਪਰ ਨਾਰੀ ॥
      Abandoning his own wife, he is engrossed in sexual desire; his thoughts are on the wives of others.   Context:  Its not just talking just about adultery, the English translations are limiting, generally the concept is to not covet another wife, in the context of Bani, doesn't mean you can have sexual relations with women who are not married. Our rehat and history make it clear that one cannot have any sexual relations outside of marriage. There is a specific reason the Guru had 10 forms over 200 years, it was to show Sikhs how to live and practically apply Bani, otherwise the SGGSJ would have been all compiled by Guru Nanak and there would be no long history of the Guru in his many forms.    The SGGSJ isnt a rule book, and isnt going to specifically ban everything that we know is immoral. Where in SGGS Ji does it say that Sri Guru Har Rai Sahib Ji was the 7th Guru Sahib after Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji? Why would a primary Sikh text not name him?  In terms of Gurbani, when taken into context, and even compared to rehat and our history, its clear that sexual relations outside of marriage are discouraged.    Do you agree with my argument? These are just a few tuks I decided to bring up, if anyone has any more, please feel free to share! 
    • Badal out, badnaam in...why do people vote so badly or