Jump to content

Would A Transgender Amritdhari Sikh Be A Singh or Kaur?


TheeTurbanator
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Kira said:

So all the Puratan Sources that say Guru Nanak Dev Ji met Bhagat Kabir Ji are wrong? all the Brahmgyanis who also said this all of them are wrong? all the historical texts where I bet you quote history from, all of them are wrong? 

Right. 

See you're the one calling me names here, you've yet to cite an actual source. I'm still waiting. 

What Puratan Sources are you referring to 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kira said:

Bhai Vir Singh Ji stated this, so did MahaKavi Santokh Singh Ji, both of them are gems in terms of gathering Sikh History. So save me the tantrum. If you want links then I'm happy to show you, but I doubt you'll read them.

Baba farid lived 350 years before guru nanak dev ji and Bhagat kabir was born over 150 years, Bhagat ramananda was born before kabir ji I could go on 

Truth the pursuit of truth is the sikh way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Baba farid lived 350 years before guru nanak dev ji and Bhagat kabir was born over 150 years, Bhagat ramananda was born before kabir ji I could go on 

Truth the pursuit of truth is the sikh way 

And I've already stated Guru Nanak Dev Ji gave them Darshan and then Amrit. Why is that hard for you understand? Guru Nanak Dev Ji isn't bound by time, he is Akaal Purkh. He can do whatever he please. Puratan sources state this, but let me guess. They knew nothing...but wait now we have Sukhvirk! the one sole champion who will revive Sikhi which conveniently died out completely after the 10th Master left his earthly form!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kira said:

Suraj Prakash Granth, the Twarikh Guru Khalsa and also the oral history recorded by Taksal.

Enough of this nonsense. If it don't fit it can't be true. If truth is akaal then The application of logic to discern truth is the only way to eliminate falsehoods, you don't seem to grasp the essence of bani if you don't understand that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kira said:

And I've already stated Guru Nanak Dev Ji gave them Darshan and then Amrit. Why is that hard for you understand? Guru Nanak Dev Ji isn't bound by time, he is Akaal Purkh. He can do whatever he please. Puratan sources state this, but let me guess. They knew nothing...but wait now we have Sukhvirk! the one sole champion who will revive Sikhi which conveniently died out completely after the 10th Master left his earthly form!

 

Lol so he was time travelling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Enough of this nonsense. If it don't fit it can't be true. If truth is akaal then The application of logic to discern truth is the only way to eliminate falsehoods, you don't seem to grasp the essence of bani if you don't understand that 

You wanted sources and you got them. Baba Deep Singh Ji fought without his head, by your logic (since that doesn't fit with the "conventional" truth) that was a lie and never happened. Guru Nanak Dev Ji took Pir Dastagir's child all through the cosmos, that's defying the speed of light thus breaking scientific "law". I guess that didn't happen, but wait. Bhai Gurdas Ji said it did, so who will you believe? are you calling Bhai Sahib a liar?

 

There's a relic in the house of a muslim family that Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave them, it lets in milk but whenever anything else is put into it, it pours it out from its holes. Guess that's all false too. I could go on..but really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kira said:

And I've already stated Guru Nanak Dev Ji gave them Darshan and then Amrit. Why is that hard for you understand? Guru Nanak Dev Ji isn't bound by time, he is Akaal Purkh. He can do whatever he please. Puratan sources state this, but let me guess. They knew nothing...but wait now we have Sukhvirk! the one sole champion who will revive Sikhi which conveniently died out completely after the 10th Master left his earthly form!

 

Make your mind up bro was he there or roop 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Make your mind up bro was he there or roop 

He gave them Darshan so yes he was there. He only went to meet them and thus it was done. Just as Bhagat Prahlad was saved by Narsimha, after his work was done. He was gone. Thus Guru Sahib gave them amrit and Darshan (as they wished) and simply assumed their nirgun form once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kira said:

You wanted sources and you got them. Baba Deep Singh Ji fought without his head, by your logic (since that doesn't fit with the "conventional" truth) that was a lie and never happened. Guru Nanak Dev Ji took Pir Dastagir's child all through the cosmos, that's defying the speed of light thus breaking scientific "law". I guess that didn't happen, but wait. Bhai Gurdas Ji said it did, so who will you believe? are you calling Bhai Sahib a liar?

Love it.. I don't think you would ever understand the esoteric knowledge bestowed upon us.. You want easy answers. You want to outsource your own capacity and understand what truth rather than seek for yourself.. If you did spend some time doing that you would realise that being so dogmatic and exclusionary is not the way of nirankaar! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use