Jump to content
InderjitS

Brothers charged with unlawful behaviour at Leamington Gurdwara cleared

Recommended Posts

Fantastic News! Sunny Hundal types and the bent committee - UP yours.

https://leamingtonobserver.co.uk/news/brothers-charged-with-unlawful-behaviour-at-sikh-temple-cleared/

this line sums up the BS and fervour stirred by the leftie liberal loons:

They argued ‘poor’ police statements had resulted in over-dramatic headlines in the national press.

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Never trust the Media whatever happens  - they can spin the story in whichever way they want

What bit? It's been widely reported they were cleared of all charges, the only thing that annoyed me was the Police response in this report

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/calls-probe-police-handling-sikh-14267792?utm_source=google_news&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=google_news&utm_content=sitemap

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I think they mean the original story. The sword wielding armed hate crime bit. 

some context wouldnt go amiss :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, InderjitS said:

What bit? It's been widely reported they were cleared of all charges, the only thing that annoyed me was the Police response in this report

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/calls-probe-police-handling-sikh-14267792?utm_source=google_news&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=google_news&utm_content=sitemap

 

Sorry, meant the original story

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/02/2018 at 3:10 PM, InderjitS said:

Fantastic News! Sunny Hundal types and the bent committee - UP yours.

https://leamingtonobserver.co.uk/news/brothers-charged-with-unlawful-behaviour-at-sikh-temple-cleared/

this line sums up the BS and fervour stirred by the leftie liberal loons:

They argued ‘poor’ police statements had resulted in over-dramatic headlines in the national press.

These muppets lied in court pretending they weren't there to protest against a so called mixed race marriage.. What a joke.. What kind of plastic singhs are they 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

These muppets lied in court pretending they weren't there to protest against a so called mixed race marriage.. What a joke.. What kind of plastic singhs are they 

Thanks genuine Singh, where did you hear they lied?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Thanks genuine Singh, where did you hear they lied?

They lied in court statements pretending they weren't there to protest against the wedding.. What a croc of <banned word filter activated>.. They shut the gurdwara down to stop the wedding going ahead.. 

This is what the organisers of the protest themselves professed.. When did singhs become so spineless as to not stand up what they believe and deal with  the consequences 

 

 

Plastic singhs 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

They lied in court statements pretending they weren't there to protest against the wedding..

please share evidence.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

leam comittee aint even singhs, most are moneh sessioners who cant even speak punjabi properly. all money men whose own kids are messed up. then the odd 'singh' they do have such a motha sio the mayor, well lets just say even the others in the committee are better than him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Share evidence.. Bro they denied being at the protest to stop the wedding.. That is the statement they made in court.. It's been recorded in court.. 

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/local-news/sikh-temple-protest-men-deny-14250016.amp

Its improbable but personally cannot say with certainty why they were present. Use of clever wording by stating they were there to protest against 'alleged misuse of funds and "corruption", aka the wedding might have got them off the hook.  I'm happy for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Its improbable but personally cannot say with certainty why they were present. Use of clever wording by stating they were there to protest against 'alleged misuse of funds and "corruption", aka the wedding might have got them off the hook.  I'm happy for them.

Clever wording! You mean they lies under oath as Sikhs I'm guessing on a ghutka.. 

And here was me thinking in sikhi we had a tradition of standing up for our beliefs and not denying them.. 

They should be ashamed of themselves they couldn't face the consequences of their actions which if they did it for their beliefs should have been easy. Their  sikhi was so cheap they lied to get off what was probably only ever going to be a small fine. 

If these guys aren't  the guardians of sikhi they are the problem.. 

On top of which they made false allegations against the gurdwara Committee 

Disgraceful behaviour 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bigger the difference in height, the more odd you will look together, and you might not feel comfortable with a well-below height partner
    • https://uk.yahoo.com/news/conmen-jailed-92-year-old-victim-plays-game-lures-arrests-084708670.html
    • but he also says later that if the husband becomes nastik a wife has the right to disassociate herself from him .
    • Agree with the fact that Talaq is not compatible with Sikhi. Even the word comes from Muslim lands. However, I think you paint with too broad a brush when you call divorce an "abrahamic thing". Christianity doesn't allow divorce, except for just a couple of specified situations: Jesus said:  He said to them, “It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.”[a] Matthew 19 Marriage is seen as a holy sacrament in Christianity. By contrast, there is nothing holy about marriage in Islam. It is merely a worldly contract, and divorce is explicitly allowed in the Koran.
    • I don't totally believe this. Yes leave the bad influences but most shastardhari rehit is still kept in India, and you will see the pooran gursikhs get together in Anandpur Sahib on Vaisakhi and Hola Mohalla. Yes you can see them trying hard here in the west, and there are those who have kept full bana even with some shastars, but still something is missing from being all-rounder pooran gursikh compared to the ladliyaa faujan in India.
×