Jump to content
InderjitS

Brothers charged with unlawful behaviour at Leamington Gurdwara cleared

Recommended Posts

Fantastic News! Sunny Hundal types and the bent committee - UP yours.

https://leamingtonobserver.co.uk/news/brothers-charged-with-unlawful-behaviour-at-sikh-temple-cleared/

this line sums up the BS and fervour stirred by the leftie liberal loons:

They argued ‘poor’ police statements had resulted in over-dramatic headlines in the national press.

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Never trust the Media whatever happens  - they can spin the story in whichever way they want

What bit? It's been widely reported they were cleared of all charges, the only thing that annoyed me was the Police response in this report

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/calls-probe-police-handling-sikh-14267792?utm_source=google_news&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=google_news&utm_content=sitemap

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I think they mean the original story. The sword wielding armed hate crime bit. 

some context wouldnt go amiss :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, InderjitS said:

What bit? It's been widely reported they were cleared of all charges, the only thing that annoyed me was the Police response in this report

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/calls-probe-police-handling-sikh-14267792?utm_source=google_news&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=google_news&utm_content=sitemap

 

Sorry, meant the original story

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/02/2018 at 3:10 PM, InderjitS said:

Fantastic News! Sunny Hundal types and the bent committee - UP yours.

https://leamingtonobserver.co.uk/news/brothers-charged-with-unlawful-behaviour-at-sikh-temple-cleared/

this line sums up the BS and fervour stirred by the leftie liberal loons:

They argued ‘poor’ police statements had resulted in over-dramatic headlines in the national press.

These muppets lied in court pretending they weren't there to protest against a so called mixed race marriage.. What a joke.. What kind of plastic singhs are they 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

These muppets lied in court pretending they weren't there to protest against a so called mixed race marriage.. What a joke.. What kind of plastic singhs are they 

Thanks genuine Singh, where did you hear they lied?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Thanks genuine Singh, where did you hear they lied?

They lied in court statements pretending they weren't there to protest against the wedding.. What a croc of <banned word filter activated>.. They shut the gurdwara down to stop the wedding going ahead.. 

This is what the organisers of the protest themselves professed.. When did singhs become so spineless as to not stand up what they believe and deal with  the consequences 

 

 

Plastic singhs 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

They lied in court statements pretending they weren't there to protest against the wedding..

please share evidence.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

leam comittee aint even singhs, most are moneh sessioners who cant even speak punjabi properly. all money men whose own kids are messed up. then the odd 'singh' they do have such a motha sio the mayor, well lets just say even the others in the committee are better than him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Share evidence.. Bro they denied being at the protest to stop the wedding.. That is the statement they made in court.. It's been recorded in court.. 

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/local-news/sikh-temple-protest-men-deny-14250016.amp

Its improbable but personally cannot say with certainty why they were present. Use of clever wording by stating they were there to protest against 'alleged misuse of funds and "corruption", aka the wedding might have got them off the hook.  I'm happy for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Its improbable but personally cannot say with certainty why they were present. Use of clever wording by stating they were there to protest against 'alleged misuse of funds and "corruption", aka the wedding might have got them off the hook.  I'm happy for them.

Clever wording! You mean they lies under oath as Sikhs I'm guessing on a ghutka.. 

And here was me thinking in sikhi we had a tradition of standing up for our beliefs and not denying them.. 

They should be ashamed of themselves they couldn't face the consequences of their actions which if they did it for their beliefs should have been easy. Their  sikhi was so cheap they lied to get off what was probably only ever going to be a small fine. 

If these guys aren't  the guardians of sikhi they are the problem.. 

On top of which they made false allegations against the gurdwara Committee 

Disgraceful behaviour 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He doesn't like this place, for reasons I have stated before. No offence to anyone here, but to outside this place, Sikh Sangat has a reputation of being a very "conservative" forum, and this is not my personal opinion.    Also, I disagree with your theoretical description of him, hes not like that.  If you wanna talk to him, you can create an account on r/Sikh.  I think you need to go back and read my comment from last time, that wasn't my opinion, that was a friend of mine (Naamdhari supporter) who said it, I even said in my comment that it wasn't my personal opinion.  As for my personal opinion on this forum, Its still too early for me to comment on things, however I didnt like the fact that a mod removed a link that I posted (to a form that I moderate) and claimed I was "targeting" someone, or even the fact that you got warned for some stupid reason and I called out that person but received no response. 
    • Tell him to make an account here. I would like to talk to this pakhandi baba. Sounds like the type who would promote mouth-to-mouth Simran, no offence to him. True. I hope you no longer hold the same opinions about Sikh Sangat as you once did.
    • I dont know his name. He goes by bulandpuri babaji. Hes really big in canada and getting famous in usa. His english isnt bad. And the accent, quite slight, just makes him sound more mystical and spiritual. Im sure hes on youtube.  I dont know much about him. But my favorite kathavachak, bhai sahib singh ji canada wale, follows him so he must be good person. 😄😃😆😅
    • But when someone spreads false parchaar and misrepresents Bani, then thats a serious issue that we as a community need to have a discussion on.    As I said before, I like to get out of my intellectual echo chamber and seek new ideas and diverse people. Ive ended up learning a lot, and its better to have a friendly debate with a friend, rather than get grilled by a person of another religion/dharma in public.   I would prefer we have an intellectually stimulating discussion rather than resorting to such measures...  
    • Bro, not taking p!ss here, but you certainly have some interesting friends. Most people have trouble finding sangat. You say he doesn't follow Singh Sabha but he sounds quite missionary-fied, or like a Dhandrianwala follower. Either way, if that's what he believes, let him, it's his jeevan. Although, he could probs use a talking to from a salotar.
×