Jump to content

A great day to be Brown / Black


Guest Jagsaw_Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

then they were eating real food and less of it, people were tougher stock those who survived had good genes . Now modern meds let everyone stumble forward . now they are slapping carcinogenic cosmetics and sunscreens on whilst stuffing their faces with huge amounts of flesh foods full of hormones , antibiotics and dioxins aprt from the fake superprocessed plaything fake foods available in the shops

Well, I agree with you there that the old, natural ways were better, either in Punjab, British Isles, or Australia.

41 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

....they are malnourished despite gorging themselves and are falling for the vaccination acceleration program .... their bodies will give out

However, it doesn't matter if the current artificial lifestyle with bad food will mean that people will die younger than they otherwise would have. According to the Australian government:

Men aged 65 in 2013–2015 could expect to live another 19.5 years (an expected age at death of 84.5 years) and the life expectancy of women aged 65 in 2013–2015 was 22.3 years (an expected age at death of 87.3 years).

So even if the bad food you referenced were to lop off a whopping four decades off of peoples' lifespans, men would die at 44.5 and women at 47.3 years of age. Anotherwords, after childbearing age.

Evolution only works when it affects fitness to reproduce. There's no other mechanism of evolution. If you (as a white Australian) are able to reproduce, it doesn't matter if you then immediately die off. Your descendants will live on (with white skin).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Well, I agree with you there that the old, natural ways were better, either in Punjab, British Isles, or Australia.

However, it doesn't matter if the current artificial lifestyle with bad food will mean that people will die younger than they otherwise would have. According to the Australian government:

Men aged 65 in 2013–2015 could expect to live another 19.5 years (an expected age at death of 84.5 years) and the life expectancy of women aged 65 in 2013–2015 was 22.3 years (an expected age at death of 87.3 years).

So even if the bad food you referenced were to lop off a whopping four decades off of peoples' lifespans, men would die at 44.5 and women at 47.3 years of age. Anotherwords, after childbearing age.

Evolution only works when it affects fitness to reproduce. There's no other mechanism of evolution. If you (as a white Australian) are able to reproduce, it doesn't matter if you then immediately die off. Your descendants will live on (with white skin).

and you haven't factored in vaccinations have sterility drugs put in them ... also have been designed to destroy female ovaries and reproductive system so no replacement babbies unless throuh IVF and at 3,000 pounds a round and the average couple needing three rounds  can't see that helping much .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Busia Anda

Once white people become a minority, the country is going to change drastically. More then likely the UK will become a cross between Pakistan and some Middle Eastern nation. From there slowly but surely all the freedoms that you enjoy today, especially for the women, will be stripped away. It will happen on a gradual basis. The media and all other institutions will be controlled. Daily life will be extremely restricted. Things are going to change very drastically.

So to all the Sikhs living in the UK, might as well get prepared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

and you haven't factored in vaccinations have sterility drugs put in them ... also have been designed to destroy female ovaries and reproductive system so no replacement babbies unless throuh IVF and at 3,000 pounds a round and the average couple needing three rounds  can't see that helping much .

Even if this were true (have any links?), how does affect selection pressure on Australian whites? Are vaccinations only given to Australian whites and not to immigrants? You have to be vaccinated to go to Australia.

If vaccinations decrease population growth in both whites and non-whites, how does that create a selection pressure for non-white skin in Australia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, InderjitS said:

hell,  there is some evidence Jesus was black. if only undeniable proof existed, that would shatter the Lilly white Christians to smithereens

That's basically a guarantee. Not only due to ethnicity and time, but also description in the new testament. Also I feel like I saw him in a dream and he was totally black but that's subjective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Jesus as we know of him is from the Eastern Mediterranean, like the Phoenicians /Canaanite. It would be highly unlikely he would be black.

 

I never said he was black, I said there's sources that say he changed form, so he could've been anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Jesus as we know of him is from the Eastern Mediterranean, like the Phoenicians /Canaanite. It would be highly unlikely he would be black.

 

Many of which are still dark after 2018 years of breeding with Europeans. His hair is described as clearly African-like in nature.  The oldest Hebrew artificats are in Ethiopia. Even if not fully black he was much closer to black than skinny hippy wypipo Jesus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest Busia Anda said:

Once white people become a minority, the country is going to change drastically. More then likely the UK will become a cross between Pakistan and some Middle Eastern nation. From there slowly but surely all the freedoms that you enjoy today, especially for the women, will be stripped away. It will happen on a gradual basis. The media and all other institutions will be controlled. Daily life will be extremely restricted. Things are going to change very drastically.

So to all the Sikhs living in the UK, might as well get prepared. 

The Labour Party will provide Britain with its first Prime Minister from a Muslim background as the Muslim population of Britain surges past the 10% mark in the coming decades. Dependent on various social situations, we will eventually see the Islamic equivalent of an anti-Semitism law. When that happens, just know that's the landmark moment that will herald the beginning of the squeeze on all non-Muslim minorities in Britain. Certain foolish, misguided whites will enable their own destruction, and drag down the rest of us with them. The seeds are being sown as of now. 

As amusing as it is to see the racists so agitated at this admittedly sound bit of science, it's a small piece of the puzzle in the larger scheme of things. I don't expect the kind of people who struggle to see what'll happen by the end of next week to be capable of recognising and extrapolating current developments decades into the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

Well as a Jew from the holy land he'd look a bit like Woody Allen but seeing how his old girl had an affair with a Roman soldier (Julius Pantera) who fathered jesus as an illegitimate son , who didn't have anywhere to stay and so was born in a barn my guess is that he looked exactly like a cross between Howard Stern and Robert De Niro appearing on the Jerry Springer / Jeremy Kyle show.

Dude. Those are all white washed diasporadic european jews. Real jews look nothing like that. 

And come on veer ji. The whole affair with a roman soldier thing? That's not really respectful and definitely not verifiable. We know almost nothing about Jesus we definitely don't know that. That's not a, (ninda is it?), that you want to carry brother. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Dude. Those are all white washed diasporadic european jews. Real jews look nothing like that. 

Yes, they're what's commonly termed as the Ashkenazi Jews, who have Central European roots and congruous genetic features fairly similar to Anglo Saxons. There's another subgroup termed as Sephardic Jews, who resemble the Spanish and Portuguese. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use