Jump to content

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

 

 

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

Lol  I really don't know what's wrong with you. So you sitting don't KNOW  where saw that I saw Harsharan's video and then did not bat an eye towards it. You are really a class apart. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BhForce said:

Continuing on with my point of view: For me, I would say it doesn't really matter to our (Sikh) viewpoint if Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution, or even in the city of Delhi, for that matter. If we insist on that, we open ourselves up to attack from some stray reference that the emperor was actually in some other random city on that dark day.

The important and crucial point would be that 1) the execution was carried out on Aurangzeb's orders, and that 2) Guru Tegh Bahadur ji acheived a moral victory against Aurangzeb's state.

For this victory to have been achieved, it does not matter if Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution or the the city of Delhi.

As an example, the let's take the atrocious attacks of 9/11: In minds of the attackers and of al-Qaeda followers, they achieved a moral victory by smashing planes into various targets. It does not matter that the President (George W. Bush) was actually outside of Washington DC (in Florida). The attack (and victory in their minds) was achieved against the state led by George Bush regardless of where he physically was on that day.

Its been proven he was there, do we really need to start a pointless debate here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, JSinghnz said:

Use your grey matter and you will know that I did not insult the OP. I only said the OP is posting work of idiots. He then showed his upbringing and lack of social behaviour. I believe you need to go back to school to understand basic stuff.

5289465+_b5033e41c86914e0f0ba519f50f2f4e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

 

 

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

He probably professes belief in some jatha  which is awaiting the manifestation of Kalki Avatar. Someone standing up for their beliefs screws up their waiting agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/02/2018 at 2:55 PM, BhForce said:

Thanks for posting this. A curse on those Marxist Sikhs like Dr. Fauja Singh who are more interested in Marxism than Sikhism.

Well deserving of his fate, no?

Thanks for alerting us of this execrable excuse for a Sikh.

I must apologize to @Sukhvirk1976, he has nothing on this fellow. How strange it is that some Sikhs feel the need to hate on their own history.

Here's more information on the abominable Bikram Lamba:

http://imposteorsikhbikramlamba.blogspot.in/2011/01/impoteor-sikh-bikram-lamba.html

Darshan kar lo, ji:

Bikram+Lamba.bmp

 

I would like to state, is it a must that we interpret this line in the Bachittar Natak:

‘Shattering the pitcher of his mortal coil on the head of the Delhi emperor, did Teghbahadur depart…’ (15) 

that Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution? I would say that this line is merely metaphorical. Guru Tegh Bahadur ji was not actually smashed against Aurangzeb, rather Guru ji smashed the state led by Aurangzeb. Thoughts?

You don't need to apologise to me mate.. Waking up each morning and living with your need to create falsehoods about sikhi and sikh history is something you need to be sorry about.. It's all love bro one day when you are unable to dance around and avoid facts you'll be apologising to your own consciousness for denying rationalism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

You don't need to apologise to me mate.. Waking up each morning and living with your need to create falsehoods about sikhi and sikh history is something you need to be sorry about.. It's all love bro one day when you are unable to dance around and avoid facts you'll be apologising to your own consciousness for denying rationalism 

You've never even touched a Sikh historical text dated pre-20th century..that's a bit rich coming from you. Then again its always one rule for you and another for everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use