Jump to content

Amritdharis marrying hair-cut spouses - <banned word filter activated> Jagmeet Singh ?


Guest Jagsaw_Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you do the dating does it matter who you do it with? Dating and grihast Jeevan is mostly incompatible. The girlfriend boyfriend partnership delays people from partaking in grihast, there is no ceremony for this type of partnership such as ceremony of Anand Karaj. It also encourages ex partners whereas before our community looked badly at someone who had been divorced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sangato, 

Politician : A person who acts in a manipulative and devious way, typically to gain advancement within an organization. He/She is the person who works for you. We pay their salaries. He/She works for you. They never should be the role model for anyone as politics is dirty no matter what/where/when. Jagmeet is a simple politician who will decide everything that is best for his political life. He is no different than any other gora/kala politicians. He represents Sikh community social matters and that is good for us. He represents us politically and he does his job good. Respect him for that ! HOWEVER, He is not our religious leader nor we should ever ask his input in religious matters. What he does or doesn't in his personal is his and not ours. Amritdhari marrying amritdhari is one of our main rule in our religious society. Those who don't follow are the ones at the fault. Don't protect someone who made or is making a religious mistake. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LifeIsBeautiful said:

Speaking as a mona kid who was born in Canada

what does your hair cutting have to do with this topic?  Unless you are saying you are a better match for jagmeet Singh fiance since both of you cut hair.  Then I fully agree with you.

Who he marries is none of your guys concern.

This public news of who is his wife is what an amritdhari shall not do.  This is what people have written about and for some reason you are very bothered by Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji teaching.  

Honestly I goto the gurdwara here all the time and having jagmeet in power shows parents their kid could keep kesh too. I know if i would have a kid, i would keep his kesh.

This actually lowers the status of Singhs.  Jagmeet Singh pick for a fiance is a disgrace on Singhs image.  Now we will have people saying, look even the amritdhari singhs want women with hair cuts and dress promiscuously. This being one reason we will strongly condemn his act.  

Since Jagmeet Singh is in politics.  He should be called to Sri Akal Takht sahib to answer for his mistake.  Parcharaks actions are highlighted and some are called to Sri Akal Takht sahib for their mistakes.  In the same way Jagmeet Singh should be summoned before Sri Akal Takht sahib for his mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LifeIsBeautiful said:

To jigsaw singh, judge not ye be judged. Honestly who made you god to judge everyone. 

Could you have bothered to quote from Gurbani, bro? As opposed from the Bible?

18 hours ago, LifeIsBeautiful said:

Honestly I goto the gurdwara here all the time and having jagmeet in power shows parents their kid could keep kesh too. I know if i would have a kid, i would keep his kesh.

Good on you, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/02/2018 at 6:36 AM, BhForce said:

evangelism/ɪˈvan(d)ʒ(ə)lɪz(ə)m/

noun
  1. the spreading of the Christian gospel by public preaching or personal witness.

By that definition, no, Sikhi does not promote spreading of the Christian gospel. But if you mean "spreading of Sikhi by public preaching or personal witness", yes it does promote that:

ਆਪਿ ਜਪਹੁ, ਅਵਰਹ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਵਹੁ ॥  (p290)

Recite yourself, and cause others to recite the Name.

What is your definition of "evangelism"?

How disingenuous! Seriously.. Evangelism is not just related to the bible! 

 

You took the first line from the online definition what about "

zealous advocacy or support of a particular cause." 

 

 

On 08/02/2018 at 6:41 AM, BhForce said:

Yes, Sikhi does promote discrimination. Have you read Gurbani, bro?

 

ਗਉੜੀ ਮਹਲਾ   
 
ਹਰਿ ਕੇ ਦਾਸ ਸਿਉ ਸਾਕਤ ਨਹੀ ਸੰਗੁ  
The Lord's servant does not associate with the faithless cynic. 
 

ਓਹੁ ਬਿਖਈ ਓਸੁ ਰਾਮ ਕੋ ਰੰਗੁ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ  
One is in the clutches of vice, while the other is in love with the Lord. ||1||Pause|| 

p198

And there we have it.. I am shocked at your assertion that sikhi promotes discrimination.. Really.. How can you resolve nirankaar, nirbhau, nirvaar as being discriminatory 

Seriously 

 

 

 

Faithless cynic indeed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

How disingenuous! Seriously.. Evangelism is not just related to the bible! 

I did nothing disingenuous. I did not go searching for an obscure definition to make my point. 

The search engine that almost everyone (91%) of people use is Google. Plug "evangelism" into Google, and you get the definition I posted:

evangelism/ɪˈvan(d)ʒ(ə)lɪz(ə)m/

noun

the spreading of the Christian gospel by public preaching or personal witness.

Of 10 search results on the page (excluding Google's own definition), all 10 (including the oldest university in the English world--Oxford) have a Christian meaning for evangelism. Only one has a non-Christian meaning from the search result page. Hence, a Christian meaning of evangelism is entirely reasonable, and is not disingenuous by any means.

Oh, and by the way, I checked this on a number of Google websites, including the US site (google.com), and the UK site (google.co.uk).

As if this wasn't sufficient, I went ahead and allowed for a non-Christian meaning of evangelism in my post:

Quote

But if you mean "spreading of Sikhi by public preaching or personal witness",  ...

The entire rest of the Sangat can check that in my post here.

So who is being disingenuous?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use