Jump to content

Is India overated?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

gorey like India because they can reliver the raj experience they reckon ... also their money goes further but even so they take the mick
 

 

 

 

omg, i feel so bad for the aunty.. :@ some peoples hankar is too much.. Not to mention some of the people like to go to lalacha locals to convert in India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, simran345 said:

I’m not being picky, and being brown has nothing to do with it. Like I said I wouldn’t go back for the relatives but to visit as a tourist instead. Nothing wrong in that, nobody can force anybody to stay with anybody they don’t like or have been treated badly by. 

Indian relatives can be the worst. I do intend on going back to india as a tourist also. Which will be alot more fun then spending time with money greedy relatives. I have  mostly distant relations there also anyway on the nanake side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I always feel that India is a place where being a sociopath is the norm.

It is a country which prides itself on it's cunning. 

The country is a dump because no one cares, there is no value of life and they can be very indifferent to a lot of the problems.

There is no rule of law because everyone seems to be trying to cut corners all the time. 

This is the reason why it takes a big shittar or danda to keep everyone in line. It is the only thing these people seem to respond to.

What i noticed is that many people lack decent morals. Its all about money and status. The poor are treated badly and abused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

Are you really basing your view on a whole subcontinent after visiting one sh!tty city?

You were in Delhi, why didn't you go? It's not far.

Dehli was so bad. It put me off the whole of india. It just seemed like one big garbage tip.Made me appreciate being born in the uk. 

Im sure Punjab is better though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

What i noticed is that many people lack decent morals. Its all about money and status. The poor are treated badly and abused. 

that's what you get when you have corrupt 'brahmins' who wouldn't know Akal Purakh from a barn door running the whole show , apparentely the whole system is for their benefit, the worker castes make things, do the dirty work in the fields and elswhere, the kings amass the territories and riches , the soldiers protect it and the brahmins preach but yet do not contribute, eat yet do not honour effort, amass riches yet do no toil, point out enemies yet do not defend . What is their value ? JACK

however if we are talking true brahmin according to Gurbani, then that would be a treasure indeed ...a person who heals the wounded hearts of the people , who motivate with divine inspiration , who sees Akaal Purakh in all , who is humble

The poor are basically slaves , and slaves have no status in the eyes of the owners of the country's wealth , that's why their deaths in 2017 over demonetisation farce didn't even register in the news media...and will not matter in the case of cancer , drugs, crime etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, proactive said:

Apart from the PC there is also the fact that the west knows that Indians especially the ruling classes are very insecure and need endless amounts of flattery in order to get them to do the west's bidding. The west needs India to buy it's goods and services and to use India's cheap labour. In essence India is still a colony of the west as the west like the British rulers before 1947 use India as a supplier of raw materials (and labour) and then sell the value added goods and services to the Indian consumer.   India's population at the moment is it's biggest advantage as the west needs India's consumers for its goods and services, But wait a few decades or even less than that when the impact of AI and robotics replace million of jobs around the world. Western countries are already considering things like universal basic income.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/31/finland-universal-basic-income

The west can afford such innovative ways of paying people to do nothing because their jobs have been replaced by robots and AI. What will happen to countries like India? When the west does not need it's cheap labour. When the millions of cybercoolies manning it's call centres become unemployed as AI replaces their jobs? 

 

 

If properly represented in government, I think there is room for sustainable, manpower driven, economies.  But it requires that people have access to land and are able to use it.  Population increasing as automation also increases is a scary concept though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use