Student tried to kill parents with a bomb over white girl

[jkvlondon]

1 minute ago, MrDoaba said:

Plus highly retarded.

most eighteen year old guys these days are , very few know their ar5e from their elbow

[MrDoaba]

11 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

most eighteen year old guys these days are , very few know their ar5e from their elbow

Very true. They say kids are smarter at that age compared to the old days and that kids mature faster but I think that's just pure bullsh!t.

Putting aside any opinions on the white girl, most normal or sane kids, if they weren't prepared to take no for an answer would have said "eff you, I'm leaving". Whatever led to the major brainwave this id!ot had, to believe that a car bomb bought of the web no less was the solution, only God knows.

[jkvlondon]

2 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

Very true. They say kids are smarter at that age compared to the old days and that kids mature faster but I think that's just pure bullsh!t.

Putting aside any opinions on the white girl, most normal or sane kids, if they weren't prepared to take no for an answer would have said "eff you, I'm leaving". Whatever led to the major brainwave this <banned word filter activated> had to believe that a car bomb bought of the web no less was the solution, only God knows.

just follow the consequences , parents dead -home is empty , money in bank ... goes to next of kin i.e. him  provided he got away with it ...no chance with deficient brain power. It was never about the girl , it was about the moola

[MrDoaba]

2 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

just follow the consequences , parents dead -home is empty , money in bank ... goes to next of kin i.e. him  provided he got away with it ...no chance with deficient brain power. It was never about the girl , it was about the moola

It's nothing new in our qaum. I've seen it plenty of times, hell in my own family even. The people who pull it off though, have a nasty demise.

[jkvlondon]

2 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

It's nothing new in our qaum. I've seen it plenty of times, hell in my own family even. The people who pull it off though, have a nasty demise.

what goes around , comes around but tenfold ...that's what I have seen

[GurjantGnostic]

Well, that was dumb, lol and malevolent.

Something  confuses me from the article however. 

It says the FBI posed as dealers, then intercepted the package, but if they were the ones sending it, what has to be intercepted?

I suppose they actually passed his order on to an actual delaer and intercepted that to bust the dealer, then passed on the fake to bust the other guy?

But no arms dealers were arrested so they actually conducted themselves in a way that put an actual bomb in the mail, until they could intercept it?

And the camera angle...who mounts a camera to look at  a patio floor?  That a satellite photo?  That looks like a flatscreen to me and it doesn't even match the shape of the box, and if you look at his back you can see this white line, like it was photoshopped.  His face is dark on the side closest to the camera but he doesn't cast a shadow.  There is something shady about this.  If you zoom in between him and what he's holding there is another weird white line.  I don't know what's up with this guy or the event but that photo isn't real.  And what's up with his left leg coloration?

British people throwing the word racist around in the comments cracks me up. 

[MrDoaba]

7 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

But no arms dealers were arrested

This information could have been omitted. The FBI are not exactly open books. Also that particular newspaper likes to jump to conclusions to get a story out ASAP. Half the time the info in their stories is not accurate, they later publish a correction.

7 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

And the camera angle...who mounts a camera to look at  a patio floor?  That a satellite photo?  That looks like a flatscreen to me and it doesn't even match the shape of the box, and if you look at his back you can see this white line, like it was photoshopped.  His face is dark on the side closest to the camera but he doesn't cast a shadow.  There is something shady about this.  If you zoom in between him and what he's holding there is another weird white line.  I don't know what's up with this guy or the event but that photo isn't real.  And what's up with his left leg coloration?

Many people do, to see who's coming and going or to keep an eye on their car, plus it could be cropped. He is quite clearly holding something which would fit in that box - the image is misleading in that way, looks very 2-D. The line could be anything. Do bear in mind that these home CCTVs vary in quality in terms of colour and clarity, and still shots suffer even more.

[GurjantGnostic]

3 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

This information could have been omitted. The FBI are not exactly open books. Also that particular newspaper likes to jump to conclusions to get a story out ASAP. Half the time the info in their stories is not accurate, they later publish a correction.

Many people do, to see who's coming and going or to keep an eye on their car, plus it could be cropped. He is quite clearly holding something which would fit in that box - the image is misleading in that way, looks very 2-D. The line could be anything. Do bear in mind that these home CCTVs vary in quality in terms of colour and clarity, and still shots suffer even more.

Where are the shadows?  Other than his face?  I don't know anything about this story, but that photo isn't real.

Pick where you think the light source is, and then look to where the shadows from it should be, and if his face is dark on that side why isn't anything else dark on that side?

[GurjantGnostic]

Next, use the date feature on google to try and go back and find the story when he was arrested.  It doesn't exist until he's sentenced already that I can find so far.

[MrDoaba]

4 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Where are the shadows?  Other than his face?  I don't know anything about this story, but that photo isn't real.

Pick where you think the light source is, and then look to where the shadows from it should be, and if his face is dark on that side why isn't anything else dark on that side?

I don't know nearly enough about photo analysis to comment conclusively. Some good points you've raised. What I do know however, is that the court would most certainly have seen the CCTV footage.

I'm sure they have other evidence. I may be biased though, while the UK can be highly unjust, generally with this type of case, the public do not have as much mistrust in law enforcement as the US.