Jump to content

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, sitokaur said:

PLEASE NOTE, I AM A KHIDHI/ ANT

5a57f84e5f5bb_AntPowder.jpg.05f562d858124007463e0ba9ecfec852.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, sitokaur said:

Vahiguroo Kirpa,

My views remain despite nasty (except noble Inderjit S) replies, and the individual in video(in gora outfit of slavery he has on vs bana?), next discusses pointy turban as slavery but in 5.26 of his Nishan video, displaying Gold Nishan portrait, can be seen Guru Gobind Singh Jio in pointy Dastaar on a horse, and please no need to reply_/\_.

I know Khalsa Raj will come as Gurbani reveals; as is Hukam of Akal Purakh, WITHOUT GUNS!:)

I'm sure you wear Bana 24/7 then. And you seem a bit dense, the pointy turban he talks about is a nok style turban not a flippin' Dastaar Bunga. Two completely different styles.

Yes guns will be used because guns are also Hukam of Akaal, else Maharaaj would not have written about them in Gurbani.

Now then...where did I put that ant powder???

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny doaba ant buster:)

My point about bana is why is he in slavery outfit, while attempting to justify Khalsa Nishan today, is sign of slavery?

To reply of post about being tearful, it is tears of bairaag over seperation from Guru Pita Maharaj for oneself and entire creation, not realising it is reaching Sehaj, after overcoming feelings of each of us being seperate from each other atey Akal Purakh, that Anand of Khalsa Raj will be realised!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sitokaur said:

Vahiguroo Kirpa,

My views remain despite nasty (except noble Inderjit S) replies, and the individual in video(in gora outfit of slavery he has on vs bana?), next discusses pointy turban as slavery but in 5.26 of his Nishan video, displaying Gold Nishan portrait, can be seen Guru Gobind Singh Jio in pointy Dastaar on a horse, and please no need to reply_/\_.

I know Khalsa Raj will come as Gurbani reveals; as is Hukam of Akal Purakh, WITHOUT GUNS!:)

Wow amazing. Guru Sahib fought without guns. Hope no one attacks you on the street man, I would love to see you "love" them to death. Ghandi Style.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Kira said:

Wow amazing. Guru Sahib fought without guns. Hope no one attacks you on the street man, I would love to see you "love" them to death. Ghandi Style.

We can do this bro...

5a58f5120c803_FlowerPower.jpg.2b4886edeacaa6ff8e14da39695461d2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sitokaur said:

I know Khalsa Raj will come as Gurbani reveals; as is Hukam of Akal Purakh, WITHOUT GUNS!:)

I really don't understand how. We have proven beyond doubt Guru Ji and his Sikhs fought with rifles in addition to a wonderful array of bladed weapons. You cannot make blanket statements without evidence.

 

Edited by InderjitS
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guru Parvasa Jio_/\_,

It has been over 30 years since 1984, and Singhs Soomay in Sri Darbar Sahib Jio HAD GUNS, BUT YET SANT JARNAIL SINGH BHINDRANWALE SAID DO NOT USE GUNS, ONLY IN SELF DEFENSE, but the enemy brought tanks, killed babies, seniors...all, as excuse of flushing out terrorists(?, they brought military in shoes, tanks..and we are terrorists?!), from our Holiest Shrine.

WHEN A HINDU ASKED SANT JI TO HELP DAUGHTER BEING ILLTREATED OVER DOWRY, HE CALLED HINDU DAUGHTER, HIS DAUGHTER BECAUSE HE IS KHALSA, AS WE ARE, AND WE SHOULD RISE ABOVE THEIR ANIMAL THINKING TO KNOW ENOUGH KHALSA HAVE BECOME SHAHEED, we become totally imbued with Gurbani Sach as Sant Maghar Singh Jio, Whom was totally spared despite being in drowning boat, then, amongst very heavy ongoing artillery warfare, yet Sant Jio spared in deep meditation.

We have to keep asking what is this paapi murakh ant barking about achieving Khalsa Raj without guns?!

Gandhi, I read somewhere was not as he seems within, as he spoke ill of non hindus, so again animal thinking we have to ask Akal Purakh Vahiguroo kirpa dya BAKSHLEI BAKSHANHAR JIO_/\_

Vahiguroo bhul chuk muaf

ps. Guns etc artillery is nothing compared to shield Prahlad, Sant Maghar et al achieved as Khalsa!

 

Edited by sitokaur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why anyone would think that the Gurus did not use guns, or would not use any weapon they have available to them for good.

The russians have a saying "Pray to God, row for shore".

I'd like to share these passages from "Pearls of Sikhism"

Following the Martyrdom of Guru Arjan Ji...

..."The silent resistance and suffering for righteous cause  might sometimes enable the tyrant to see his evil actions and he can be improved.  But history stands witness that no amount of non-violence can succeed against a tyrant who is hardened and steeped in criminal oppressive ways and who pays no heed to basic values or moral and civilized conduct.  Against such men, non-violence is only another name of disgraceful cowardice in their dictionary.  Such power drunk men must be struck with a stick bigger than theirs.  The Guru (Gru Har Gobind Ji at this time) issued an order to the Masands that he would be pleased with those who brought offerings of arms and horses instead of money.  He laid the foundation of Akal Takhat...."

..."Guru Tegh Bahadur's martyrdom symbolized in itself the resistance to the tyranny of Muslim rule in favor of a new society.  When evil is holding its head high, should a holy man knuckle under it or take up arms to combat and destroy it?  The young Guru, Gobind Rai, decided in favor of the latter course i.e. to combat evil and uphold righteousness.  He thus enjoined upon his followers to make use of the sword if all other means failed to liquidate the wicked and his wickedness.  In order to achieve this mission, he issued "Hukamnamas" to his follower to present him with arms of different designs.  The Guru's orders were obeyed and with great zeal and devotion.  He himself wore uniform and bore arms and induced others to practice archery and musket-shooting...."

If Khalsa Raj comes into being without guns, it surely will not last without guns, and if it comes into existence without Khalsa guns it will be by the authority of some foreign power....with guns.  There is a reason why kirpan is one of the five k's and it isn't because it looks pretty.  Can you imagine what would happen if poof Kalistan exists....oh btw friendly neighbors we don't have any guns, we trust you won't hurt us...I mean historically you've never tried to genocide us before.....so we're good right?

 

Edited by GurjantGnostic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sitokaur said:

ps. Guns etc artillery is nothing compared to shield Prahlad, Sant Maghar et al achieved as Khalsa!

So are you questioning the use of Shashtars by Guru Sahib, Baba Deep Singh, Baba Banda Singh Bahadur? 

Where did Sant Jee say do not use guns, did he carry his pistol for show? Please read what I wrote earlier and do not skirt around the issue, evidence please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, this sitokaur is a troll

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Lord, its like talking to someone with half a brain. No one here has said even once we should go out shooting people, We learn Shaster vidya to protect yourself. Showing off the weapons isn't anything wrong, as it was done in Guru Sahib's time as well.

The fact that this magical "shield" wasn't used by Mahapurkhs only goes to show how atuned they were with God that they fought with their own hands rather than using Siddhis. To even get close to that level of Brahmgyan is next to impossible, if people actually think that sitting down with a Gutka will protect them from someone smashing their face in, then they're no better than the Hindus who Babar destroyed. They sat around "praying" and "loving" Babar to stop, it didn't phase him and he crushed them with ease.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Singh123456777 said:

Guys, this sitokaur is a troll

Yeah.  I've only recently been reading sikhi forums and I can tell you that sikh forums are heavily targeted by trolls....like....overly so.  Haters gonna hate.  Look their profile pic is a stock image.

stockphoto.jpg

Edited by GurjantGnostic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • apparently she is a shameless characterless woman - think her actions have proven this to be true 
    • Salute to this mahaan jodha who sacrificed his all for us, funding himself for the sangaarsh, turning his back on a successful business and the luxuries of the west.  
    • If a Simran/mediation section is made on this forum. We collectively can do a lot of Name Simran Jaap's together   It must be remembered  that GURMANTAR  is not just a word; lying hidden behind it is the subtle form of  guru's presence     personality  soul          light   essence of love   divine glance Continuously meditating of GURMANTAR with faith and love will produce a state where the letters of the GURMANTAR "WAHEGURU" will imperceptibly begin to dissolve, melt and transform into a subtle form    - its illuminated form    - its principle form    - its bliss producing form    _ love radiating form    - life giving  force ts Naam form These divine form/force/vibrations then change into and appear as             Jingling (sounds)            limitless tinkling sound              Divine music Just as Bhagat Kabir has said, "The letters shall perish. The imperishable  Lord cannot be described through these letters." ( 340) 
    • Many Sikhs and asians in general look up to the royal family. But did anyone realise how racist the royal family is. They may not show it upfront be belive me these people are the most racist you can get.  Heres some remarks that were caught on tape by Prince harry. If this is what they say in the open. Who knows what tripe they come out with in private. some info taking from wikpedia  Harry earned a reputation in his youth for being rebellious, leading the tabloid press to label him a "wild child".[151] He was seen at age 17 smoking cannabis and partaking in underage drinking with his friends, clashing physically with paparazzi outside nightclubs,[151] and was photographed at Highgrove House at a "Colonial and Native" themed costume party wearing a Nazi German Afrika Korps uniform with a swastikaarmband.[152] He later issued a public statement apologising for his behaviour.[153] In January 2009, the British tabloid, the News of the World, revealed a video made by Harry three years earlier in which he referred to a Pakistani fellow officer cadet as "our little Pakifriend" and called a soldier wearing a cloth on his head a "raghead". These terms were described by then-Leader of the Opposition David Cameron as "unacceptable",[154] and by The Daily Telegraph as "racist",[154] with a British Muslim youth organisation calling Harry a "thug".[155] Clarence Houseimmediately issued an apology from Harry, who stated that no malice was intended in his remarks.[156] Former British MP and Royal Marine, Rod Richards, said that such nicknames were common amongst military comrades, stating "in the Armed Forces people often used to call me Taffy. Others were called Yankie, Oz or Kiwi or whatever. I consider Paki as an abbreviation for Pakistani. I don't think on this occasion it was intended to be offensive."[157]  
    • When are we going to see HTTPS support?
×