Jump to content
ramneeksingh

New pic of Satguru Gobind Singh ji and nara formulated by Thakur Dalip Singh

Recommended Posts

"ਵਿੱਦਿਆ ਦਾਤੇ ਦਸ਼ਮੇਸ਼, ਪ੍ਰਗਟੇ ਆਪ ਪ੍ਰਮੇਸ਼"।

This is new nara formulated by Thakur Dalip Singh, please give review on picture and on above nara


 

low-pic.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds nice I would say.  The picture looks very divine too. Education was highly stressed by Guru Gobind Singh. By being knowledgeable a Sikh can practice religion better and earn enough to be in a position to support themselves and the needy too.

Edited by sikhni777
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sikhni777 said:

Sounds nice I would say.  The picture looks very divine too. Education was highly stressed by Guru Gobind Singh. By being knowledgeable a Sikh can practice religion better and earn enough to be in a position to support themselves and the needy too.

but at the same time he drives home his seperateness from khalsa panth (see last line of poster), is this the faction which recently went to Akal Takht for maafi and if so why are they doing that . Are they hoping to enrole sikhs into naamdhari ways from inside the body of the General Panth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost anything we see theee days has a double meaning.  The naamdharis do not even have fere around SGGS at their weddings.  They have Guru jis after Guru Gobind Singh Ji. Are they now realising their mistakes? 

It seems a device to use to lure youngsters into their dharam and to justify and hide the mistakes their panth has made in the past.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

but at the same time he drives home his seperateness from khalsa panth (see last line of poster), is this the faction which recently went to Akal Takht for maafi and if so why are they doing that . Are they hoping to enrole sikhs into naamdhari ways from inside the body of the General Panth?

Yeah he's the one. He has some good things to say, tries to work for the qaum in general, promotes Gurmukhi etc. His status has been reduced from to Guru to Sant, although there's no doubt many of his followers still see him as Guru. In all fairness he does tell them not to call him that. Their Samparda is working for Ekta in the Panth which is commendable.

I must say, Namdharis have a solid Maryada.

He is sneaky though, he still promotes Namdhari beliefs (to him and his chele Jagjit Singh was technically the last Guru) but at the same time he's more mainstream. While they don't have the level of Satkaar for SGGS as they should, they have started to address Guru Sahib as Guru. He's also met and been a guest of some prominent Gursikhs as far as I know. A warm reception usually.

Some women got caught doing his Aarti recently, which landed him in some sh!t from Akal Takht however.

6 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

The naamdharis do not even have fere around SGGS at their weddings.

And how do you know this wasn't the original way of Anand Kaaraj? The way they do it is probably the way it was done back in the day.

Edited by MrDoaba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/21/2017 at 4:30 PM, jkvlondon said:

but at the same time he drives home his seperateness from khalsa panth (see last line of poster), is this the faction which recently went to Akal Takht for maafi and if so why are they doing that . Are they hoping to enrole sikhs into naamdhari ways from inside the body of the General Panth?

You people who think you are true sikh and close to guru gobind singh ji, you have never thought of bringing this aspect of guru ji before public but If namdhari have done that you are making fun of them you people can just opposed others you cant create, you cant do any good thing but you can just opposed others namdharis are not correcting there mistakes they are doing something which we could not do we all should appreciate this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/21/2017 at 4:48 PM, sikhni777 said:

Almost anything we see theee days has a double meaning.  The naamdharis do not even have fere around SGGS at their weddings.  They have Guru jis after Guru Gobind Singh Ji. Are they now realising their mistakes? 

It seems a device to use to lure youngsters into their dharam and to justify and hide the mistakes their panth has made in the past.

let me know who started this fere maryada ? Anand Maryada ? search find explore then answered me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/21/2017 at 11:23 PM, MrDoaba said:

Yeah he's the one. He has some good things to say, tries to work for the qaum in general, promotes Gurmukhi etc. His status has been reduced from to Guru to Sant, although there's no doubt many of his followers still see him as Guru. In all fairness he does tell them not to call him that. Their Samparda is working for Ekta in the Panth which is commendable.

I must say, Namdharis have a solid Maryada.

He is sneaky though, he still promotes Namdhari beliefs (to him and his chele Jagjit Singh was technically the last Guru) but at the same time he's more mainstream. While they don't have the level of Satkaar for SGGS as they should, they have started to address Guru Sahib as Guru. He's also met and been a guest of some prominent Gursikhs as far as I know. A warm reception usually.

Some women got caught doing his Aarti recently, which landed him in some sh!t from Akal Takht however.

And how do you know this wasn't the original way of Anand Kaaraj? The way they do it is probably the way it was done back in the day.

yes therefore he ordered their followers to address with properly to guru granth sahib ji, we ordered namdharis to hold 3 feel long kirpan and did many more work and still doing according to the gurbani only for ekta, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ramneeksingh said:

You people who think you are true sikh and close to guru gobind singh ji, you have never thought of bringing this aspect of guru ji before public but If namdhari have done that you are making fun of them you people can just opposed others you cant create, you cant do any good thing but you can just opposed others namdharis are not correcting there mistakes they are doing something which we could not do we all should appreciate this.

 

I did not make fun of anyone I asked why they still need that seperate 'namdhari' label when they have claimed to be under Guru Granth  Sahib ji and  also the fact that there are a branch of their old organisation which is carrying on with their dehdhari Guru idea.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell please where it is written that there cannot be a dah dhari guru ?can you please tell :
where it is written that sikh should not believe in any human being living ? Where is it is written in Adi bani or dasam bani?
If somebody can  please tell me then we'll discuss further

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/23/2017 at 7:27 PM, jkvlondon said:

I did not make fun of anyone I asked why they still need that seperate 'namdhari' label when they have claimed to be under Guru Granth  Sahib ji and  also the fact that there are a branch of their old organisation which is carrying on with their dehdhari Guru idea.

Can you tell please where it is written that there cannot be a dah dhari guru ?can you please tell :
where it is written that sikh should not believe in any human being living ? Where is it is written in Adi bani or dasam bani?
If somebody can  please tell me then we'll discuss further

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ramneeksingh said:

Can you tell please where it is written that there cannot be a dah dhari guru ?can you please tell :
where it is written that sikh should not believe in any human being living ? Where is it is written in Adi bani or dasam bani?
If somebody can  please tell me then we'll discuss further

 

Where is it written that a Guru lies to his own sikhs? where is it written that a Guru would sit still while his sikhs were hunted down? You're the one asserting the Dehdhari Guru, not us. So the burden of proof is on you. Find proof that Guru Sahib changed his face,with historical sources from the time of Guru Gobind Singh Ji's passing. You wont find it in any historical because it doesn't exist. 

Please refute Poet Sainpati and testimony from the sikhs that actually conducted the last rites of Guru Gobind Singh Ji's physical sareer. 

All you have is old wives tales, I can sit here and make them up as well. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/23/2017 at 9:13 AM, DayaKaur said:

let me know who started this fere maryada ? Anand Maryada ? search find explore then answered me.

the anand karaj ceremony done today i think started in the late 1800s, before then no one knows for sure.

I think  Mcauliffe in one of his books on Sikh Religion mentioned that a particular order of Sikhs instead of calling Bhrahmans and doing fere around a fire, did fere around the sripture (GuruGranthSahib)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ramneeksingh said:

Can you tell please where it is written that there cannot be a dah dhari guru ?can you please tell :
where it is written that sikh should not believe in any human being living ? Where is it is written in Adi bani or dasam bani?
If somebody can  please tell me then we'll discuss further

 

Let's just put this argument to one side for a second. Let's say Namdharis are correct, and your version of history is right...does that mean the rest of the Panth are fudus for not following your Baba? Or is the extreme minority correct i.e you?

In most cases the majority is correct, and in this case we are the majority and we have it on pretty good authority that we are indeed correct.

Instead of trying to do your bullsh!t prachaar and undo the good work Namdharis have done so far, why don't we discuss things we have in common?

Don't make a fudu out your samparda bro. Anyway seeing as you are their spokesman, you should know that Thakur Daleep Singh has stated he is not Guru. Unless of course he was lying??? Please ask him and clarify otherwise I will have to set his kachera on fire.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ramneeksingh said:

Can you tell please where it is written that there cannot be a dah dhari guru ?can you please tell :
where it is written that sikh should not believe in any human being living ? Where is it is written in Adi bani or dasam bani?
If somebody can  please tell me then we'll discuss further

 

tussi tai Guru Pita ji nu jhoota, darpok edan kush sabit karna chaunda hoi , per eh pehle dusde is your dehdhari Guru APP PARMESHAR?

why is Guru Granth Sahib referred to as ADI Guru/ Jagat Guru ....because it is the only Guru of Sat - complete knowledge to help ALL of mankind , the eternal Guru ...

IF all Sikh Jagat for over four Hundred years have called and respected Adi Granth ji as Guru saman from Dhan Dhan Guru Arjan Dev ji who himself bowed to and also sat on the floor in Adi Granth's presence who the hell are you to question Guru Granth Sahib's Status ? In fact, apart from usurping Guru Granth ji's place you have also dismissed Guru Panth ji out of hand...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×