Jump to content
Big_Tera

Britian First

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

They have nothing against the hardworking Indian community of Sikhs and Hindus. Infact they respect us and know the difference between us and Muslims

That's way too much generalization for two sentences :rofl

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with a person saying that we should stay neutral. Don't go against and don't lend support either. It is always beneficial from all sides if one decide to stay neutral.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those who grew up in the 70's and 80's know who Britain first really are, they used to be called the BNP and the National Front before that, they are a fascist group and anyone who thinks they respect or get on with Sikhs should ask the elder generation about their previous incarnations.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

That's way too much generalization for two sentences :rofl

Reading your replies to this post, although some of it is true, this topic is not about Britain as a nation, its in regards to Britain First which is an anti islamic group. 

 

Main issues in the UK are, girls born into 'Sikh' households with minimum knowledge on Sikhi being 'love' swept and in a lot of cases groomed by suleh. There have been cases where guys have converted aswell, with the majority either being part of gangs or general weirdos who have been brainwashed. In regards to your previous posts where you mention you fancy muslim guys with short hair... I am pretty sure Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj warned us about illicit relationships, particularly with muslims... so maybe you should look into that deeper and think where you stand due to your illicit relations with muslim men?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

Reading your replies to this post, although some of it is true, this topic is not about Britain as a nation, its in regards to Britain First which is an anti islamic group. 

 

Main issues in the UK are, girls born into 'Sikh' households with minimum knowledge on Sikhi being 'love' swept and in a lot of cases groomed by suleh. There have been cases where guys have converted aswell, with the majority either being part of gangs or general weirdos who have been brainwashed. In regards to your previous posts where you mention you fancy muslim guys with short hair... I am pretty sure Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj warned us about illicit relationships, particularly with muslims... so maybe you should look into that deeper and think where you stand due to your illicit relations with muslim men?

I actually read a little abt "Britain first" after seeing your thread. 

Regarding dasam pita warning us against marrying muslims (strange guru ji didn't mention brahmanical hindus), I remember a sakhi where Guru ji once visited a friendly muslim jagirdar, and mughals stormed in jagirdars palace to capture guru sahib.

The jagirdar hid guru saaab in his daughters bedroom and said "inside is my daughter with my son in law". Obv even mughals didn't want to disturb the couple .and jagirdar did this on purpose to save guru jis life. 

Would guru ji accept this if he was particularly anti Muslim. 

We shud b more concerned abt hindus nd muslims both marrying off our girls. 

I don't see anyone on this site complaining abt hindu moneh boys marrying sikh girls nd its not even uncommon .

 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, sikhni777 said:

Why why why!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why?????????????? Do you have to spit out your abnormal sexual fantasies on a religious site????????

why??????????? Stop it ........STOP IT!!!!! STOP IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!

OH WAHEGURU........... writing the above did take a lot of energy out of me. I hope your bad thoughts get ironed out by the burst of positive energy I have just sent you.

You chose to ignore 80 percent of my post nd focused on the last 20 percent. 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, simran345 said:

That’s because your last 20% ruined the first 80% and it became 0.1%. 

None of you protested when one of the posts above md derogatory references like "faggot", "fruitcake",etc. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, kcmidlands said:

Those who grew up in the 70's and 80's know who Britain first really are, they used to be called the BNP and the National Front before that, they are a fascist group and anyone who thinks they respect or get on with Sikhs should ask the elder generation about their previous incarnations.

In the 70s and 80s they were a completley different group. Back then It was against anyone of any faith or colour. 

But look at the policies and agenda now. There is only praise for Sikhs. 

It is all against muslim extremism. 

They have moved on now. We can use them to our advantage. Staying neauteral is one idea. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

None of you protested when one of the posts above md derogatory references like "faggot", "fruitcake",etc. 

Why are you even writing your sexual fantasies on here? Nobody else does that. Stop making it all about yourself. We get it you are attracted to other males, but that doesn’t mean others like you go and write their fantasies on a Sikhi website. That’s very immature to do, and makes one wonder why you do it. Sikhni penji is right, can you stop it, otherwise get help with your lustful thoughts that you feel the need to write them all over the forum. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

I actually read a little abt "Britain first" after seeing your thread. 

Regarding dasam pita warning us against marrying muslims (strange guru ji didn't mention brahmanical hindus), I remember a sakhi where Guru ji once visited a friendly muslim jagirdar, and mughals stormed in jagirdars palace to capture guru sahib.

The jagirdar hid guru saaab in his daughters bedroom and said "inside is my daughter with my son in law". Obv even mughals didn't want to disturb the couple .and jagirdar did this on purpose to save guru jis life. 

Would guru ji accept this if he was particularly anti Muslim. 

We shud b more concerned abt hindus nd muslims both marrying off our girls. 

I don't see anyone on this site complaining abt hindu moneh boys marrying sikh girls nd its not even uncommon .

PS i nvr had illicit relationship with a muslim dude although i wudnt mind, i saw this 🔥 young man on station today wearing arabic tunic. Damn they look hot in dat ^_^

Ruined a completely valid point with that ending. Please refrain from sharing such thoughts in future. Bare in mind that your sisters use this forum too.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'll keep my strawman theories to myself and enjoy the show. We should have sold pay per view rights for this.     
    • Kind of a tangent but there seems to be a whooole lot of varying degrees of beard trimming going on....that or taking amrit does something to the shape and length of all these beards you see on Guru ji's chela.  From my ignorant perspective it seems like that is one of the five k's almost nobody is adhering to.  Is there something I'm missing?
    • just for everyone knowledge, we are letting this thread run as unmoderated.
    • Guest Jagsaw_Singh
      I really, honestly, think the local police and health authority need to have you sectioned under the Mental Health Act London Jawan. You are unbalanced in a very scary way 
    • Have you considered that maybe on this one special day, he didn't want to "bike" to his wedding? I thought people were criticizing him for marrying a non-Amritdhari. That is warranted. To begrudge him not having a super-simple wedding is not warranted. I suppose you're also upset that he and his bride wore finery on this one special day instead of khaddar (homespun cotton)? If they wanted to wear khaddar, that's fine, too, but they didn't, and that's fine, too. Compared to what some brides wear, her clothes are extremely conservative: no cleavage, no bare midriff, no arms even. What's the problem? What you're saying would have some import in context. The fact is whenever there's a wedding among our people, rows upon rows of airplanes are filled with people flying out (or in). If that were not the case, then your complaining about Jagmeet Singh's airplane ride would have an impact, but it doesn't. Huh? Then on what basis? Are you serious? What are you even talking about? Did you not see the pictures @jkvlondon posted here? Just so there's no misunderstanding, here's the actual wedding pic (attached). I ask you again: She's wearing a chunni (on her head, not around her as a fashion accessory on her shoulders). What else do you want?
×