Here's why sikhs should stop marrying hindus altogether !!

[Guest]

Back to the topic . Why Sikhs shouldn't marry outside religion

[Preeet]

9 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

You are the only one who raised the issue of my orientation here, atleast on this thread ! I didn't 

Several of RSS men are gay . Why do you think they  are life time bachelors ?!!

I represent myself, not the kaum . And BTW, since you asked for it , I have never bent forward (thats a boring sex position anyways lol) . I am a virgin . 

PS: Just because the kaum  ignore homosexuality, doesn't mean homosexuality ignores the kaum. Nature gives enough of homos to all kaums, including sikhs. You can choose to bury your head in sand like ostrich but it won't change reality. I am not kidding , there're many gabroo young turbaned sikh men who're gay in my friend list ! 

vaheguru ji ka khalsa
vaheguru ji ki fateh

I think if you have the sikh image in real life, then you ARE representing sikhs when you live life. Just like how a pandit ji can have a shikha/bodhi hair and janeu, but when he may do a crime people will say 'omg look at what that pandit/baba/sadhu ji did', people wont say 'omg look what ajeet did' when youd do a crime with a sikh roop, they will say 'omg look at that that sikh did' cuz of how you look... I have no intention to offend you at all. Infact I think if you do more paaps pubically youd get more paaps cuz if a mona does it people will say that was a mona whatever (& its hard to tell a monas religion), but you are representing a dharm if you have a sikh roop and do weird stuff, which means itd badnaam the sikh image as well. vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

[Prokharkoo84]

Ajeet Singh your sexual preferences are who you are, I am not disputing that or going to tell you that homosexuality is wrong. I personally have no issues with it but on a Sikhi level based on my knowledge I do not think its right. What annoys me is that you use this forum which is for Sikhi to boast about your preference in men etc. From when I was a monah and looked towards Sikhi and Singhs, it was the likes of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, Baba Deep Singh Ji, Sant Jarnail Singh who inspired me to take the Sikhi saroop. If I had looked at Singhs who were homosexual, then I most likely wouldnt be where I am today. Be who you are, but be very careful the damage you can cause to the Quom by showing off about your sexual preferences in a Sikhi atmosphere. Look how many viral videos there are of 'Singhs' doing stupid stuff, lets not make a jaloos of our people and disrespect the blood of our shaheeds. Every Quom has got homosexuals, muslims probably got the most but yet they keep it in house or do not let it tarnish their dharam in any way.

[Kira]

6 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

Ajeet Singh your sexual preferences are who you are, I am not disputing that or going to tell you that homosexuality is wrong. I personally have no issues with it but on a Sikhi level based on my knowledge I do not think its right. What annoys me is that you use this forum which is for Sikhi to boast about your preference in men etc. From when I was a monah and looked towards Sikhi and Singhs, it was the likes of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, Baba Deep Singh Ji, Sant Jarnail Singh who inspired me to take the Sikhi saroop. If I had looked at Singhs who were homosexual, then I most likely wouldnt be where I am today. Be who you are, but be very careful the damage you can cause to the Quom by showing off about your sexual preferences in a Sikhi atmosphere. Look how many viral videos there are of 'Singhs' doing stupid stuff, lets not make a jaloos of our people and disrespect the blood of our shaheeds. Every Quom has got homosexuals, muslims probably got the most but yet they keep it in house or do not let it tarnish their dharam in any way.

Yeah ,even homosexuals don't like their typical feminine types, they see it as an embarrassment, lusting over men constantly is now being frowned on too apparently. 

People like this dude here are disgusting, not for being gay but constantly saying on a sikh forum about who's "sexy or not" . Gay, straight or a god dang koala bear that type of language and lustful thoughts should be kept to a minimum on here atleast.  

[MrDoaba]

Quote

about who's "sexy or not"

Reminds me of that programme Snog, Marry, Avoid on BBC3 a good few years back. Hahaha

[Guest]

10 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

Ajeet Singh your sexual preferences are who you are, I am not disputing that or going to tell you that homosexuality is wrong. I personally have no issues with it but on a Sikhi level based on my knowledge I do not think its right. What annoys me is that you use this forum which is for Sikhi to boast about your preference in men etc. From when I was a monah and looked towards Sikhi and Singhs, it was the likes of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, Baba Deep Singh Ji, Sant Jarnail Singh who inspired me to take the Sikhi saroop. If I had looked at Singhs who were homosexual, then I most likely wouldnt be where I am today. Be who you are, but be very careful the damage you can cause to the Quom by showing off about your sexual preferences in a Sikhi atmosphere. Look how many viral videos there are of 'Singhs' doing stupid stuff, lets not make a jaloos of our people and disrespect the blood of our shaheeds. Every Quom has got homosexuals, muslims probably got the most but yet they keep it in house or do not let it tarnish their dharam in any way.

I have had a strong urge to cut my hair and get a cool hairstyle but i fear god's wrath and losing guru's support too 

What should i do ?

i seriously wanted to experience being a monah once . 

[Kira]

2 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

Reminds me of that programme Snog, Marry, Avoid on BBC3 a good few years back. Hahaha

It's actually quite funny, I think i saw it a couple of times. I have a friend who's studying sociology (im in the science disciple so my knowledge of sociology is really limited compared to him), he said he found it rather funny how once gay men get over their whole lust drive (more or less) they tend to fall into the same routines (and desire similar attributes) as straight couples.  What's more the whole "penji" type gays who flaunt around have become pariahs due to their negative impact on the community as a whole. 

Ironically "thinking with your D" is slowly becoming a more negative thing quality to possess. 

 

[MrDoaba]

5 minutes ago, Kira said:

It's actually quite funny, I think i saw it a couple of times. I have a friend who's studying sociology (im in the science disciple so my knowledge of sociology is really limited compared to him), he said he found it rather funny how once gay men get over their whole lust drive (more or less) they tend to fall into the same routines (and desire similar attributes) as straight couples.

It was good entertainment for those days.

Interesting observation, but wouldn't that be the case for many straight couples - the getting over the lust part, or have I misinterpreted what you mean? And what is meant by 'desire similar attributes', do you mean in terms of orientation or general human attributes regarless of gender?

[Kira]

3 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

It was good entertainment for those days.

Interesting observation, but wouldn't that be the case for many straight couples - the getting over the lust part, or have I misinterpreted what you mean? And what is meant by 'desire similar attributes', do you mean in terms of orientation or general human attributes regarless of gender?

it's my fault, i should have phrased things a bit better. Basically based on the data he gathered same sex couples are more likely to settle into a routine and are less likely to do things out of said routine (such as cheating, which according to the data he gathered was surprisingly low compared to straight couples).

By similar attributes I mean people like them in terms of personality and taste. In straight couples you can usually note a sort of polarity in the way they behave and their personalities. 

Again this is based on one study, nothing official or on a large scale really.

[Punjabiwolves]

On 11/19/2017 at 9:24 PM, jkvlondon said:

veer ji 

How much do you think it was down to the fact you aunt was a sikh woman , that sikhi florished?

so by what you are saying you are more like a sehajdhari sikh , one from another faith but who identifies more with sikhi?

No one is a Brahmin UNLESS they have Brahmgian ... that is what I have heard ...so very few qualify I guess

yeah could be the fact that my Aunty was devoted Siki but my uncle followed her ways in Sikhi and embraced it . People on here think that Sikhi could die off if they marry a Hindu/ sehajdhari sikh , person but it can also flourish.  Where   I do think its wrong to marry is if the Hindu is pure devotee Hindu and does not accept Sikhi. 

like I said before I am only Bharmin by name. even then I dont accept it as I am against the caste system. I dont think any of my family members have had the holy ceremony(as in Baptism )  that Bharmin's  have. Also a Bhramin are not  meant to leave India. all NRI's  who claim to be  Bhramins are not actual  not.