Jump to content
MrDoaba

So I took a Ethnicity DNA Test...

Recommended Posts

After waiting ages to take a DNA test, I finally got around to it recently. The results were, for the most part, what I expected.

Here's my estimate:

Asia - 85.4%

  • South Asian - 79.9%
  • West Asian (Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, Caucasus, Turkey) - 4.3%
  • Central Asian (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazahkstan) - 1.4%

Europe - 14.6%

North and West Europe

  • Irish, Scottish, and Welsh - 11.6%
  • Scandinavian - 3.0%

Even though these are only estimates, they give an idea of my ethnicity in a broad sense. Nonetheless 14.6% is still considered a fairly large proportion in an estimate, and in all honesty was completely unexpected. My knowledge on DNA and genealogy are probably basic at best but from what I've read such a large percentage of the European could be traced back as early as the 5th or 6th generation before me!

This estimate didn't really tell me much as I would have liked to know so I decided to use GEDmatch to get a more in-depth picture. The results were certainly interesting (Jagsaw Singh if you're still around I'm sure you'll be the most pleased). For the sake of the topic I'll mention that I'm Punjabi Jatt.

This is what I found out:

Baloch - 37.94% (The term Baloch is used here to loosely describe Persian origin)

South Indian - 29.43% (South Indian here refers to indigenous or native Indian)

NE-Euro - 11.70% (oddly the Baltic region)

Caucasian  - 11.30% (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan - again part of the Greater Persian Empire)

SW-Asian - 2.28% (ambiguously referring to Persian, Caucasian, and Arabian)

Mediterranean - 2.25% (most likely Greek, Cypriot, Turkish)

The rest is negligible.

You are also given an approximation how closely you are linked and compare to the individual populations of the sampling done by the genealogists, here are the top ten from highest to lowest:

1) Punjabi-Jatt-Sikh
2) Punjabi-Jatt-Muslim
3) Punjabi-Khatri
4) Pushtikar-Brahmin
5) Kashmiri-Pandit
6) Punjabi
7) Kashmiri
8) Punjabi-Brahmin
9) Rajasthani-Brahmin
10) Singapore-Indian

 

What do you think? I was surprised at some of the detail it went into and some of it was actually expected - I have always explained to people how we very likely had Persian and possibly some European ancestors. Although I probably won't, personally I would love to lay claim to my Persian heritage!

Has anybody here taken a test?

What labels, if any, do I use now...Persian Jatt  :rofl

I think the moral here is we shouldn't be so narrow-minded.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Kira said:

 

LOL yeah yeah I took the generic one with a pinch of salt. The second one defo provides some insight though, if it's your kind of thing.

I'm an undercover RSS agent...see how closely I'm related to Brahmins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ya Welsh sheep sha... 

That's crazy man. Could you share the link of the test you took? I'd like to give it a go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

Ha ya Welsh sheep sha... 

That's crazy man. Could you share the link of the test you took? I'd like to give it a go

Oye saala.

I took mine with MyHeritage. There's quite a few companies which do it but no point wasting money on the more expensive generic ones. Once you get your results make sure you use GEDmatch after for better results - it's free.

https://www.myheritage.com/login?destination_url=https%3A%2F%2F

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

sorry to burst your bubble but such tests are mostly hyped 

https://www.livescience.com/7384-genetic-ancestry-tests-hype-scientists.html

Mate I do not fall for marketing so easily, and so naturally I did some reading before taking the test, and took it with a good dose of scepticism. I also took into account the companies' policy and disclaimer as well as general info on generic DNA testing, hence, my earlier comment about taking it with a pinch of salt. The link you provided is about 10 years old and DNA testing has come a long way since then, and unlike that article say, the test I took (like most generic companies today) looks at DNA from both the paternal and maternal line - which in most cases can only look at the last few hundred years or so. Still I see your point, it was quite vague and probabaly not as highly accurate as many would like it to be, then again they make it very clear that it's an estimate and that it gives you a rounded idea so it's not a wild guess either.

This is why I used GEDmatch - a free website created by professional genealogists with more utilities than aam janta would need. It's a no-frills site for people who are serious about genetics and genealogy and goes a bit further back to look for specific genetic markers. In order to use the site you only need your raw DNA data from the generic testing companies. The heritage/ethnicity tool they provide uses a large independent sample database which has calculators for specific reference populations which can pinpoint fairly well in my experience - this is evident from the fact that it picked up my Punjabi Jatt heritage. They've obviously done their work and I have no reason to dismiss the project, especially the one used for people with Asian origins.

All in all, there's nothing which is unusually surprising from my results - they seem to make the most logical sense according to history and geography. It's also worth mentioning that on both my paternal and maternal side, my grandparents, great grandparents, 2/3x great grandparents, great uncles and aunts had traits that tie in with my results - majority of them were very fair skinned, had light coloured eyes etc.

Up to you if you want to take them into consideration as an estimate, the second being rather accurate, or if you want to write the whole thing off as bullsh!t. We're all entitled to our opinions.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

Mate I do not fall for marketing so easily, and so naturally I did some reading before taking the test, and took it with a good dose of scepticism. I also took into account the companies' policy and disclaimer as well as general info on generic DNA testing, hence, my earlier comment about taking it with a pinch of salt. The link you provided is about 10 years old and DNA testing has come a long way since then, and unlike that article say, the test I took (like most generic companies today) looks at DNA from both the paternal and maternal line - which in most cases can only look at the last few hundred years or so. Still I see your point, it was quite vague and probabaly not as highly accurate as many would like it to be, then again they make it very clear that it's an estimate and that it gives you a rounded idea so it's not a wild guess either.

This is why I used GEDmatch - a free website created by professional genealogists with more utilities than aam janta would need. It's a no-frills site for people who are serious about genetics and genealogy and goes a bit further back to look for specific genetic markers. In order to use the site you only need your raw DNA data from the generic testing companies. The heritage/ethnicity tool they provide uses a large independent sample database which has calculators for specific reference populations which can pinpoint fairly well in my experience - this is evident from the fact that it picked up my Punjabi Jatt heritage. They've obviously done their work and I have no reason to dismiss the project, especially the one used for people with Asian origins.

All in all, there's nothing which is unusually surprising from my results - they seem to make the most logical sense according to history and geography. It's also worth mentioning that on both my paternal and maternal side, my grandparents, great grandparents, 2/3x great grandparents, great uncles and aunts had traits that tie in with my results - majority of them were very fair skinned, had light coloured eyes etc.

Up to you if you want to take them into consideration as an estimate, the second being rather accurate, or if you want to write the whole thing off as bullsh!t. We're all entitled to our opinions.

 

tell me just one simple thing .

How does it change your life or kaum by knowing where you originated from ? It can only help one's ego to know that they're 15% european or .. you know .... a part of so called "elite"  race 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters where you come from, to be honest. 

Does it affect your Sikhi, even in the slightest way?

If you are just doing it to find your history (somehow), then go ahead.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, monatosingh said:

I don't think it matters where you come from, to be honest. 

Does it affect your Sikhi, even in the slightest way?

If you are just doing it to find your history (somehow), then go ahead.

 

we all originated in africa . 

No rudeness intended to OP but honestly we're faced with so many dire issues in kaum that needs our immediate attention :/ 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

tell me just one simple thing .

How does it change your life or kaum by knowing where you originated from ? It can only help one's ego to know that they're 15% european or .. you know .... a part of so called "elite"  race 

It doesn't, that's not why I took the test. I did it out of sheer curiosity, it's human nature to want to know your origins, and kade kade shaunk vi pura karna penda ah, no? It's had absolutely no impact on my life and it's not gonna. If the scientific side has no significance to you, then just see it as a bit of fun.

And no where in my post indicates I have an inflated ego brother, did you not read the Jatt joke? If any anything I put my results here in opposition to those who act elitist - infact some people I've mentioned the test to are scared to even entertain the idea of taking it, they're so fragile.

We are who we are and obviously it's not going to change.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MrDoaba said:

It doesn't, that's not why I took the test. I did it out of sheer curiosity, it's human nature to want to know your origins, and kade kade shaunk vi pura karna penda ah, no? It's had absolutely no impact on my life and it's not gonna. If the scientific side has no significance to you, then just see it as a bit of fun.

And no where in my post indicates I have an inflated ego brother, did you not read the Jatt joke? If any anything I put my results here in opposition to those who act elitist - infact some people I've mentioned the test to are scared to even entertain the idea of taking it, they're so fragile.

We are who we are and obviously it's not going to change.

ok lol 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

tell me just one simple thing .

How does it change your life or kaum by knowing where you originated from ? It can only help one's ego to know that they're 15% european or .. you know .... a part of so called "elite"  race 

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, S4NGH said:

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

I don't even need a genetic test . I have golden brownish hair (esp near the skin) , brown eyes and fair skin , A positive blood group , 

My mother's side blue / light colored eyes not uncommon . All these traits point to some degree of european ancestry 

Anyways, we all have aryan blood . Aryans were nothing but central asians or europeans . 

Anyways why the eff does it matter lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

To be fair if the Celtic part of the results are true, it's not as bad as it coming back British (even though you can't really define British). It's most likely to be Scottish as the Scots and Scandinavians did a fair bit of mingling.

Scottish people are quite admirable. At least in this regard:

"...for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly. To be proud of one's language we should strive to speak words from our own language. Rabb is a commonly heard word in our community, but many do not know that it is Arabic. We can use indigineous words such as Ishwar or Parmatma instead during daily discourse. It's actively trying to bring back words that we used but were forced to extinction in our language because of violent invaders.
    • The question would be are there arab loanwords that can be gotten rid off if we have perfectly good indigenous words we could use instead. For example, should we use sansaar instead of duniya.  What other words could we replace if it is already in our vocabulary. Do some us prefer the back throated sounds of the Arab words because we think it sounds sexy and we can pretend to be some pakhandi Sufi poet? 
    • We would also have a far deeper presence in the Gangetic Plains.  No British, no East India Company, no Purbia /Bihari army with no mutiny.  The last remaining mughals would have been finished off a lot quicker.  Awadh,  Agra,  Lucknow would have fallen into Sikh hands.  There would be a link of Sikhi stretching all the way to Patna. 
    • 19 11 2017 1) What costs more than riches but doesn't cost a penny; that's also hard to find yet easy to lose? 2) How can you make seven even? 3) If you have me, you want to share me. If you share me, you haven't got me. What am I? 4) What is so delicate that saying its name breaks it? 5) am free yet priceless, you can't own me but you can use me, you can't keep me but you can spend me. Once you lost me you can never have me back. What am I?   Well, the answers are : 1) Friend 2) Drop the  S 3) Secret 4) Silence 5)Time
    •   THIS IS EPIC A man was being interviewed for a post of a commando in the Army... Interviewer : we want a person with a suspicious mind,  always alert,  ready to attack, acute sense of hearing, detective ability, and most importantly, having a killer instinct ! So do you think you are eligible ? Man: Sir ....  can my wife apply ?     Made for each other.. Relationship is easy,
      when spouses know each other Here are 2 classic  examples: 1) A husband comes home after attending a club meeting.
      He tells his wife,“Dear there was a drinking competition after meeting today.” His wife spontaneously...,
         “Who got the second position?” 2) A wife tells her husband,
      “Dear there was a letter for you.
      It’s written on the envelope,
      ‘Private and confidential.’” The husband casually asks,
           “What was written inside?" Great understanding of each other.  
×