Jump to content

So I took a Ethnicity DNA Test...


MrDoaba
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MrDoaba said:

It doesn't, that's not why I took the test. I did it out of sheer curiosity, it's human nature to want to know your origins, and kade kade shaunk vi pura karna penda ah, no? It's had absolutely no impact on my life and it's not gonna. If the scientific side has no significance to you, then just see it as a bit of fun.

And no where in my post indicates I have an inflated ego brother, did you not read the Jatt joke? If any anything I put my results here in opposition to those who act elitist - infact some people I've mentioned the test to are scared to even entertain the idea of taking it, they're so fragile.

We are who we are and obviously it's not going to change.

ok lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

tell me just one simple thing .

How does it change your life or kaum by knowing where you originated from ? It can only help one's ego to know that they're 15% european or .. you know .... a part of so called "elite"  race 

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, S4NGH said:

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

I don't even need a genetic test . I have golden brownish hair (esp near the skin) , brown eyes and fair skin , A positive blood group , 

My mother's side blue / light colored eyes not uncommon . All these traits point to some degree of european ancestry 

Anyways, we all have aryan blood . Aryans were nothing but central asians or europeans . 

Anyways why the eff does it matter lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

I don't know man. If my results showed I was somehow any percentage european/white, I'd be pretty blumin disappointed... 

To be fair if the Celtic part of the results are true, it's not as bad as it coming back British (even though you can't really define British). It's most likely to be Scottish as the Scots and Scandinavians did a fair bit of mingling.

Scottish people are quite admirable. At least in this regard:

"...for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to mata ji_/\_DNA in Sikhi denotes DHAN NAAM AMRIT...so, in my opinion..in angrezi DNA is Do Not Agree..with findings, as surely our blood contains kurr of environment soil, wind, water atey fire..that Guru Sahib created, put together to mold our sareer, before He blew Naam Life in us, so we live in Naam laha award pride vs kurr beings kaal destiny blood type false pride ji:rofl

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always this assumption that somehow migration was from West to East.  Migration went the other way too.

Furthermore, for example it is assumed that red hair is Celtic.  However, where did the Celts come from? They went from Asia into Europe.

There was a red haired race known as Tocharians that lived in North West China. 

Also, from studies have shown that until about 7000 years ago that Homo Sapiens that entered into Europe were brown skinned and had blue eyes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use