Jump to content

“If jarnail singh wasn’t in Akaal takhat, then it would not have been destroyed”


Guest Confused
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Confused

One of my relatives had said this to me, and it kind of makes sense. If jarnail singh wasn’t in akaal takhat in the first place then the Indian government wouldn’t need to enter harmandir sahib. They could have fought anywhere else, on open field etc. But he chose harmandir sahib. The Indian government had gone into harmandir sahib to capture sant jarnail singh right? So if he wasn’t situated in akaal takhat, the government had no reason to enter harmandir sahib and kill the Sikhs. (I’m not condoning the Indian government and especially not indra because of what the government did to the  innocent Sikhs, I’m just talking about akaal takhat)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats wrong! I hate wish the government would already just go to hell

Government tried their best to destroy sikhi and are still trying to today. (Thats a whole other story)

This left people with many misconceptions

Like yours or even the whole sant ji being a terrorist by the government

If Sant Ji was a terrorist or whatever, then why did the government release him from jail after a month after he willingly gave arrest? (the government would never be able to catch him any other way)

However, If he wasnt a terrorist, then why did the government capture him in the first place?

The government had a whole month to try to make a b.s reason or something to keep Sant ji in jail but they couldn't.

Even after release, Sant ji did open parchar, until the one incident, where buses with sri guru granth sahib ji maharaj were burned, and many sikhs were beaten or gave shaheedi. 

Why did the government create a complex that replicates the original Darbar Sahib, and practice much before the attack?

The answer to all above questions is that the government was looking for an excuse to attack Sikhi by "flushing out the terrorists". 

Also why were 40 other gurduawaras sahibs attacked beside Darbar SAhib, where there really "terrorists" there?

And If not, then why did the government attack?

Even if Sant bhindranwale did not reside at Darbar Sahib, would this have prevented the government from attacking it anyways? 

Why did the government kill all innocent sikhs inside Darbar Sahib, if they really were clearing "terrorists"

Why did beadbi of puratan granths and saroops of sri guru granth sahib ji happen if it really were the case?

 

 

This is a short response to some of the stupid understandings people have nowadays. 

Anyways, you should probably stay away from your relative if explaining this to him does not sit well.

Then again, this is kaljug, and it has gotten to the point where, sant sipahis, gurmukhs and proper gursikhs are seen as terrorists while in sachkhand they are given a seat.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Guest Confused said:

One of my relatives had said this to me, and it kind of makes sense. If jarnail singh wasn’t in akaal takhat in the first place then the Indian government wouldn’t need to enter harmandir sahib. They could have fought anywhere else, on open field etc. But he chose harmandir sahib. The Indian government had gone into harmandir sahib to capture sant jarnail singh right? So if he wasn’t situated in akaal takhat, the government had no reason to enter harmandir sahib and kill the Sikhs. (I’m not condoning the Indian government and especially not indra because of what the government did to the  innocent Sikhs, I’m just talking about akaal takhat)

Your relative needs a chittar parade- mind if I join in? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could have issued an arrest warrant for Sant Ji like the first time he was arrested in 1982 I think. If they really wanted to get Sant Ji from Darbar Sahib complex, they could have switched the water and electric supplies off in an attempt to get him to surrender. The fact they attacked Darbar Sahib wasnt just an attack on Sant Ji, but was an attack on the hearts of all Sikhs. Sadly, this seems to be getting distorted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was only to get santji, why attack on sri guru arjan dev sahibs shaheedi purb? Why allow all the  sangat to come and fill up darbar sahib then place a curfew? And so noone was able to leave. Why not attack another day when not so much sangat? Why not place curfew and stop sangat from coming in? Why kill the sangat in the parkarma?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use