“If jarnail singh wasn’t in Akaal takhat, then it would not have been destroyed”

[Guest Confused]

One of my relatives had said this to me, and it kind of makes sense. If jarnail singh wasn’t in akaal takhat in the first place then the Indian government wouldn’t need to enter harmandir sahib. They could have fought anywhere else, on open field etc. But he chose harmandir sahib. The Indian government had gone into harmandir sahib to capture sant jarnail singh right? So if he wasn’t situated in akaal takhat, the government had no reason to enter harmandir sahib and kill the Sikhs. (I’m not condoning the Indian government and especially not indra because of what the government did to the  innocent Sikhs, I’m just talking about akaal takhat)

[jkvlondon]

15 hours ago, Guest Confused said:

One of my relatives had said this to me, and it kind of makes sense. If jarnail singh wasn’t in akaal takhat in the first place then the Indian government wouldn’t need to enter harmandir sahib. They could have fought anywhere else, on open field etc. But he chose harmandir sahib. The Indian government had gone into harmandir sahib to capture sant jarnail singh right? So if he wasn’t situated in akaal takhat, the government had no reason to enter harmandir sahib and kill the Sikhs. (I’m not condoning the Indian government and especially not indra because of what the government did to the  innocent Sikhs, I’m just talking about akaal takhat)

given that Indira had planned since 1980 to attack Harmandir Sahib , built full scale replica in Doon valley in 1981 , asked three times and got refused three times by her General to attack the Gurdwara . I think your folks are totally deluded  ask them if that is true why did her father attack in 1952  and her son in 1986 and again 1988 . that family just wanted to drive home that sikhs are ghulam nothing less and if they could they would have finished us off .

[DarshaPyasi1984]

Thats wrong! I hate wish the government would already just go to hell

Government tried their best to destroy sikhi and are still trying to today. (Thats a whole other story)

This left people with many misconceptions

Like yours or even the whole sant ji being a terrorist by the government

If Sant Ji was a terrorist or whatever, then why did the government release him from jail after a month after he willingly gave arrest? (the government would never be able to catch him any other way)

However, If he wasnt a terrorist, then why did the government capture him in the first place?

The government had a whole month to try to make a b.s reason or something to keep Sant ji in jail but they couldn't.

Even after release, Sant ji did open parchar, until the one incident, where buses with sri guru granth sahib ji maharaj were burned, and many sikhs were beaten or gave shaheedi. 

Why did the government create a complex that replicates the original Darbar Sahib, and practice much before the attack?

The answer to all above questions is that the government was looking for an excuse to attack Sikhi by "flushing out the terrorists". 

Also why were 40 other gurduawaras sahibs attacked beside Darbar SAhib, where there really "terrorists" there?

And If not, then why did the government attack?

Even if Sant bhindranwale did not reside at Darbar Sahib, would this have prevented the government from attacking it anyways? 

Why did the government kill all innocent sikhs inside Darbar Sahib, if they really were clearing "terrorists"

Why did beadbi of puratan granths and saroops of sri guru granth sahib ji happen if it really were the case?

 

 

This is a short response to some of the stupid understandings people have nowadays. 

Anyways, you should probably stay away from your relative if explaining this to him does not sit well.

Then again, this is kaljug, and it has gotten to the point where, sant sipahis, gurmukhs and proper gursikhs are seen as terrorists while in sachkhand they are given a seat.

 

 

 

[S1ngh]

If sant ji was in Sri akal Takhat sahib the. Why hundreds of other gurdwaras were also attacked across punjab?

[13Mirch]

18 hours ago, Guest Confused said:

One of my relatives had said this to me, and it kind of makes sense. If jarnail singh wasn’t in akaal takhat in the first place then the Indian government wouldn’t need to enter harmandir sahib. They could have fought anywhere else, on open field etc. But he chose harmandir sahib. The Indian government had gone into harmandir sahib to capture sant jarnail singh right? So if he wasn’t situated in akaal takhat, the government had no reason to enter harmandir sahib and kill the Sikhs. (I’m not condoning the Indian government and especially not indra because of what the government did to the  innocent Sikhs, I’m just talking about akaal takhat)

Your relative needs a chittar parade- mind if I join in? 

[Guest]

Indira's main plan was to attack Harmandir Sahib in the first place, Sant Ji and all other Shaheeds helped protect it.

[Prokharkoo84]

They could have issued an arrest warrant for Sant Ji like the first time he was arrested in 1982 I think. If they really wanted to get Sant Ji from Darbar Sahib complex, they could have switched the water and electric supplies off in an attempt to get him to surrender. The fact they attacked Darbar Sahib wasnt just an attack on Sant Ji, but was an attack on the hearts of all Sikhs. Sadly, this seems to be getting distorted. 

[Not2Cool2Argue]

If it was only to get santji, why attack on sri guru arjan dev sahibs shaheedi purb? Why allow all the  sangat to come and fill up darbar sahib then place a curfew? And so noone was able to leave. Why not attack another day when not so much sangat? Why not place curfew and stop sangat from coming in? Why kill the sangat in the parkarma?

[Guest]

.

[Guest Kaur 2]

VJKK VJKF

Please watch this video it explains everything:

VJKK VJKF