Jump to content

What are Sikh and Hindu Punjabi relations like in 2017


Guest Punjabi Hindu
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/24/2017 at 11:30 AM, Guest Punjabi Hindus said:

Should we really let our communal relations die due to what the Congress Hindus did

The history of the Punjabi Hindu after the annexation of the Punjab was one of disloyalty to both Punjab and their mother tongue Punjabi. Under the Sikh rule the Hindus were able to practice their religion without any restrictions for the first time in a thousand years. Yet a few decades after British took over Punjab the Punjabi Hindus were joining anti-Sikh organisations like the Arya Samaj and advocating Hindi as the language of Punjab. The Punjabi Hindu leadership supported the mahants against the Akalis. They only made common cause with Sikhs in 1946-47 because they knew only the Sikhs would be able to withstand the Pakstan demand. Yet soon after partition the Punjabi Hindus were back to their usual traitorous ways and denying Punjabi language and opposed every demand that was for the benefit of Punjab.

You may be right that the Congress was responsible for the massacres of 1984 but the foundations of their genocidal policies were provided by the Hindu Punjabi over the centuries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/10/2017 at 4:00 PM, Guest Punjabi Hindus said:

Should we really let our communal relations die due to what the Congress Hindus did

Its not about Congress or Hindus brother ! 

Its about what RSS has done and is still doing , namely that of spreading misinformation about sikh religion .

Sikh Gurus were worshippers of what Hinduism calls "Parbrahm" ( the god of gods , the first , the inbetween and the last) . Hindus call it om or parbrahm or brahm (not 'brahma') . Sikhs call it Akaal purakh or waheguru or parbrahm or brahm.

We don't have much philosophical differences or conflicts with upanishadic hindu philosophy. The problem is trouble-makers , which were in congress and now are in RSS/BJP too . 

Why can't they simply accept the great land of india gave birth to the 4 great religions (Indian religions) , rather than being arrogant that Hinduism is the father of every religion in subcontinent.

Then they say Guru Gobind Singh ji (for whom guru ji is a nationalist) was a worshipper of Durga/Bhavani . Such utter nonsense ! 

With all due respect to the hindu goddess of power , but Guru Gobind Singh ji NEVER worshipped anything other than Parbrahm.

In his own baani , the guru writes

"Anhad roop anaahad baani , Charan Saran jeh basat Bhawani" (from Tav Prasad Chaupai)

(The lord parbrahm's/waheguru's form are endless and speech is unstruck . Even goddess bhavani takes refuge in his feet) 

 

In start of "Chandi di vaar" baani based on war of goddess and daityas, guru ji says 

"You alone, O god, created durga and destroyed the demons.

Taking power from you alone , Raam killed raavan with arrows.

Krishna took power from you and dragged kansa by hair.

The biggest of sages spent their bodies trying to understand you for ages, but none could find your limits"

(beginning verses of Chandi di vaar)

Tell me a person who says even goddess bhavani and all other gods / goddesses take refuge in feet of parbrahm, would that person worship anything other than parbrahm ?

Then what are the agendas ??

 

Trying to forcefully convince sikhs that they're hindus is very rude and aurangzeb-like.

Secondly , you need to also look at all the ruckus the shiv-sena and hindutva street gangs are doing in punjab .

Now tell me are sikhs alone to blame for the cracks in hindu-sikh relationships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Also check this out .. 

This woman is number one right-wing troll on social media . She frequently uses vitriolic language against sikhs, like in this tweet

DAZaxIwXUAElZLb.jpg

these bandarian don't even know word one of Indian history , kal ki shokrian banni phirdia propaganda mouthpieces , one question why do they have to be under 20 and dolled up when we know most kattard hinduvta girls have boy haircuts or look tragic , maybe appealing to the smaller brains of guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

these bandarian don't even know word one of Indian history , kal ki shokrian banni phirdia propaganda mouthpieces , one question why do they have to be under 20 and dolled up when we know most kattard hinduvta girls have boy haircuts or look tragic , maybe appealing to the smaller brains of guys

Honestly, she seems like a h0e for BJP politicians and RSS men. I have heard political parties in india always have arrangements for sensual pleasures for politicians. 

11 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

raghunath Rao was king in peshwa and just gave up the town without a second thought to fighting  , nowhere does it claim any maratha king fought in AMritsar locale let alone protecting it . 

We know sis . But we should be more concerned about conceited efforts by hindutva brigade to undermine sikhs at all possible levels.

Right now on this forum itself , I am highly suspicious it is being watched by hindutva agents like the op and one other guy who posted a few weeks back . Perhaps the BJP IT cell is working overtime lol. Why aren't the admins keep a check over this ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let it be clear . Sikhi has following 3 enemies in punjab : 

1) Hindutva gangs 

2) Christian missionaries

3) Islamic breeders.

And lets stop patronizing the number (1) above as they always exploit hindu-sikh relations for their own agenda 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use