Jump to content

Why do Sikhs name their daughter "Maya" when maya is an obstacle etween us and Vaheguru?


Guest Kaur 2
 Share

Recommended Posts

VJKK VJKF

I think that naming a child is very important because surely sometime in their life they will want to find out what their name means because I know for years I wanted to know what my name meant but no-one knew so I was pretty much lost but it isn't hard to find out what maya means and what the Guru says about maya.

VJKK VJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Guest K A B

Just in case anyone is still searching this... in some languages on the Indian subcontinent eg Nepali the meaning of Maya has shifted from the original Sanskrit, more negative meaning of "illusion or enchantment" to mean "love". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was searching for a name for my nephew on those sikh name websites and started checking the girl names and one of the suggestions for G was Ganika. Which Sikh in their right mind who has read bani and knows ithiaas would call their daughter Ganika!   i can see some clueless non practicing Sikhs scrolling down the names and saying  "oh, Ganika, thats a nice name, lets call her Ganika Kaur,  lovely"       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, puzzled said:

I was searching for a name for my nephew on those sikh name websites and started checking the girl names and one of the suggestions for G was Ganika. Which Sikh in their right mind who has read bani and knows ithiaas would call their daughter Ganika!   i can see some clueless non practicing Sikhs scrolling down the names and saying  "oh, Ganika, thats a nice name, lets call her Ganika Kaur,  lovely"       

Ganika sounds African-American like Shaniqua or Laquisha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Guest Another perspective

I practice meditation everyday and not in a naam japu way but what I have found connection to is Guru Nanak Ji's way of looking at God.  It's very similar to the meditation Buddhist do.  Maya is illusion and we must come out of the illusion to see god in ourselves and in everything.  Blade of grass, flowers, other humans (even though there are no others-it is just one)  We are all just one.  "Ek noor se sab jag upja"  We all come from that one light.  I remember this verse when I sit for meditation or when my mind runs to much and sees the "other" as separate from me because one of two things are involved I like them or dislike them so basically attachment or aversion-both and badly...acceptance is the best way.  

I digress - recently I heard another meditator who believes in oneness share that she has named her child Maya because it was a constant reminder to her that attachment to her will bring suffering...here is where I have to clear up what she meant (attachment is the reason for pain and suffering and attachment is not love-attachment comes with expectations-example:  your my daughter you must be this, that or the other).  True love is really about loving the other for who they are even if they do nothing for you.  But we act like we own our children and that attachment is Maya and illusion that anything in this world belongs to you.  We are not here for that.  We are here to realize ourselves to ourselves and find God within all.  To her: everytime she says her daughters name she reminds herself that she doesn't own her, she is only here to guide the child when the child needs her so that the child can be who god wants them to be and go through challenges, failures or just the journey of life...whatever is written in there destiny so that the path takes them to god.  Her goal is to not get in the way of her child so a reminder to herself daily that yes, this child came through her but there is no ownership (maya).  

Everything is Maya...all relationships (this person is more important than that but how can that be if we are all one), all things we own are maya, our physical bodies are maya...only thing true about us and which is not maya is our essence...that's why we sit and meditate to transcend maya and all attachment to it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with the first post that maya is something that makes us forgot God so why name your child that?  

another thing i find distasteful is when people stand up in Gurdware or on Sikh TV/Radio and start saying "give us your maya (money)?"

why don't they just say money?  why would anyone ask for 'maya' is a Gurdwara of all places?  and if they think it is 'maya' why are they asking for it? lol.

just so shifty!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2021 at 4:41 AM, Guest Another perspective said:

I practice meditation everyday and not in a naam japu way but what I have found connection to is Guru Nanak Ji's way of looking at God.  It's very similar to the meditation Buddhist do.  Maya is illusion and we must come out of the illusion to see god in ourselves and in everything.  Blade of grass, flowers, other humans (even though there are no others-it is just one)  We are all just one.  "Ek noor se sab jag upja"  We all come from that one light.  I remember this verse when I sit for meditation or when my mind runs to much and sees the "other" as separate from me because one of two things are involved I like them or dislike them so basically attachment or aversion-both and badly...acceptance is the best way.  

I digress - recently I heard another meditator who believes in oneness share that she has named her child Maya because it was a constant reminder to her that attachment to her will bring suffering...here is where I have to clear up what she meant (attachment is the reason for pain and suffering and attachment is not love-attachment comes with expectations-example:  your my daughter you must be this, that or the other).  True love is really about loving the other for who they are even if they do nothing for you.  But we act like we own our children and that attachment is Maya and illusion that anything in this world belongs to you.  We are not here for that.  We are here to realize ourselves to ourselves and find God within all.  To her: everytime she says her daughters name she reminds herself that she doesn't own her, she is only here to guide the child when the child needs her so that the child can be who god wants them to be and go through challenges, failures or just the journey of life...whatever is written in there destiny so that the path takes them to god.  Her goal is to not get in the way of her child so a reminder to herself daily that yes, this child came through her but there is no ownership (maya).  

Everything is Maya...all relationships (this person is more important than that but how can that be if we are all one), all things we own are maya, our physical bodies are maya...only thing true about us and which is not maya is our essence...that's why we sit and meditate to transcend maya and all attachment to it.  

 

thats a nice story, but for sikhs maya does not mean 'control'.  in fact i dont think it means that in any indian language.  our scripture defines maya as something that makes you forget God.  our aim is to always remember God.  to us, it is like a Christian naming their child 'satan'.  lol.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we look at our scriptures for guidance, then we get an idea of what type of name we should give to a child. In Bhai Gurdas jis Vaarn the sakhi of Ajmal is written. Ajmal was a papi, he was a drunk and he left his wife to live with a dancing girl. The dancing girl had a baby and a holy man suggested that Ajmal call the baby boy Hari/Narayan, which is another name for Waheguru ji. As Ajmal's bad lifestyle caught up with him he got very ill and was bed ridden, he then would call out for his son "Hari, Hari, Hari" day and night. By constantly repeating Hari, Ajmals sins started washing away and he fell in love with naam.

This sakhi may have difference versions, but the message is the same. 

So this Sakhi tells us which type of name we should give to a baby. Maya is an obstacle! Its the biggest obstacle between us and Waheguru Ji, so by giving your child the name Maya, you actually are doing the complete opposite of what bani says.

Some people shrug their shoulders and say "what's in a name" ?   well, bani suggests otherwise  ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest kalashakala

Beacuse they are stupid and name their child with any popular bollywood name or any english sounding name because as you know punjabiz are the new whites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Words in India have many nuances

Maya can also mean beautiful.  

The story of Ajmal is that he named his son Narayana and later turned away from the religious life.  When he was dying he called out for 'Narayana' but he was calling out for his son, not God. However the Names of God are so powerful that it still had a religious effect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use