Jump to content
proactive

Independent Newspaper's hit piece on Sikh Youth UK

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

How does one incite hatred when the animosity was already there well before Tommy came in the scene.

The EDL is not what it once was.

In regards to Tommy,  if you keep tabs on what he is doing has moved on from the EDL. He's writing books, has has death threats against him as actually confronts the groomers, like Bhai Mohan Singh he has a mission.

The thing about Tommy is that he is not wrong.

Common goals makes strange bedfellows. 

The sentence should have read 'further hatred'. The animosity has existed for many years but constantly denouncing something through speech in front of dozens only serves as a negative reminder and reinforces bad feelings i.e. islam/muslims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/10/2017 at 6:46 PM, proactive said:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sikh-youth-uk-muslim-film-university-tommy-robinson-edl-sex-groomers-islamophobia-racism-a8002526.html

Read the above earlier today. It is a total hit piece against the great work done by Panthic organisation Sikh Youth UK. It has quotes from that odious leftie Balwinder Rana of the one man 'Sikhs against the EDL' and the dhimmi Katy Sian who incidentally won the 'heroes' against the Islamophobia awards from the Islamic Human Rights council, an organisation which is an oxymoron in itself. It looks like the liberal sell out fake sikhs can't handle the fact that Sikh organisations like SYUK are making such a huge impact in the community so they have started their character assassinations of this  organisation. The Rana <banned word filter activated> has even tried to assassinate the character of Bhai Mohan Singh of SAS because he spoke at the Football Lad's march last month. The left wing sell out one man band organisations like 'Sikhs against the EDL' and 'Turban Campaign' are seen for the jokes that they are in the community and so they want to try and throw some mud on SYUK and see if any will stick. 

Syuk are not representatives of the sikh quam.. They are a abomination 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

How does one incite hatred when the animosity was already there well before Tommy came in the scene.

The EDL is not what it once was.

In regards to Tommy,  if you keep tabs on what he is doing has moved on from the EDL. He's writing books, has has death threats against him as actually confronts the groomers, like Bhai Mohan Singh he has a mission.

The thing about Tommy is that he is not wrong.

Common goals makes strange bedfellows. 

Tommy Rob is a bell and.. Shame on his apologists 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Tommy Rob is a bell and.. Shame on his apologists 

 

Tommy Robinson is going to be right about a lot of things.

It's cultural Marxists like yourself that are going to be proved wrong in the years to come.

Are you Sunny Hundal in disguise by any chance?

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rana is a con man, stirs up trouble for government funding. Turban campaign have nothing to say on turban issues, such as airport issues. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of these leftists actually do any positive community work at the grass roots level to assist with issues affecting the Sikh community or do they just stir up controversy by writing biased articles to make themselves seem significant or obtain government funding ?

SYUK have several initiatives with volunteers travelling up and down the country to promote and bring awareness of the Sikh faith. They run a helpline to assist members of the panth with any real world issues. 

What exactly do Rana, Katy Sian, Sunny Hundal  etc do at a grass roots level for the faith they claim to represent ?? 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, GuestSingh said:

The sentence should have read 'further hatred'. The animosity has existed for many years but constantly denouncing something through speech in front of dozens only serves as a negative reminder and reinforces bad feelings i.e. islam/muslims.

How can it cause further hatred? 

In the several thousand mosques in the UK, there are thousands of speeches that denigrate the kafir way of live. Is that not denigrating? Does that not reinforce bad feelings towards the kafir in dar-ul-harb?

Jews are called monkeys and pigs, yet does that not cause/re-in force against jews?

If muslims do bad things disproportionately to the size of their population,  do we not have the right to call out the bad things?

I do not think Sikhs will hate any further. All that I can see Sikhs is saying a collective "I told you so!" to the mainstream community.

Edited by Ranjeet01
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realise that no one reads the independent? It's dying a slow death and has even ceased print copies. What Tommy talks of is truth. Doesn't matter how he articulates it, he isn't lying is he? Do you want tommy to talk about things in the same way as the chattering classes? I wouldn't get worked up over what is said in newspapers or the media, people are wising up to how they form 'narratives' then get sources to back up that narrative. Another way they do this is when they mention the generic terms 'critics say xyz' or 'sources say xyz', to back up unfounded positions. All quite boring really 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/10/2017 at 6:59 AM, Ranjeet01 said:

 

 

Tommy Robinson is going to be right about a lot of things.

It's cultural Marxists like yourself that are going to be proved wrong in the years to come.

Are you Sunny Hundal in disguise by any chance?

 

Go join the Tommy Robinson and leave sikhi alone because his views have nothing to do with sikhi.. 

And before looking into your crystal ball and being so sure he will be right.. Look to the past and history about what the kind of world fascism leads to.. 

You are sikh only in name 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Go join the Tommy Robinson and leave sikhi alone because his views have nothing to do with sikhi.. 

And before looking into your crystal ball and being so sure he will be right.. Look to the past and history about what the kind of world fascism leads to.. 

You are sikh only in name 

Sorry Sunny 

As a Sikh I will speak against tyranny.

Problem is tyranny is coming people claim to be the anti fascists.

It is not coming from Tommy.

Shame you are too blind to see it.

As you are a cultural marxist,  you do realise the communists and people that fall on the political left at this moment are extremely similar to the facists. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Sorry Sunny 

As a Sikh I will speak against tyranny.

Problem is tyranny is coming people claim to be the anti fascists.

It is not coming from Tommy.

Shame you are too blind to see it.

As you are a cultural marxist,  you do realise the communists and people that fall on the political left at this moment are extremely similar to the facists. 

Please qualify your assertion and the basis of your characterisation of me as a cultural marxist 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Sorry Sunny 

As a Sikh I will speak against tyranny.

Problem is tyranny is coming people claim to be the anti fascists.

It is not coming from Tommy.

Shame you are too blind to see it.

As you are a cultural marxist,  you do realise the communists and people that fall on the political left at this moment are extremely similar to the facists. 

You don't speak against tyranny, you propagate it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sunny 

For starters you naturally assert or insinuate that Tommy Robinson is a bigot without actually hearing what he has to say.

In this free democratic country we should listen to all points of view.

The fact that you do not like this, particularly from your political end of the spectrum is very similar to the Communist era where people are dismissed without hearing what they have to say because it does not suit your narrative.

The problem with universities these days is that have become no platforms for freedom of speech (particularly since they are very much on the left)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/19/universities-told-must-commit-free-speech-new-plans/amp/

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When did I say anything about the darshan of God? Guruji tells us those that meditate on Naam maybe fortunate to have darshan of God in their dreams in a many pangtis.      ਕਬ ਦੇਖਉ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਆਪਨਾ ਆਤਮ ਕੈ ਰੰਗਿ ॥ 
      कब देखउ प्रभु आपना आतम कै रंगि ॥ 
      Kab ḏekẖ▫a▫u parabẖ āpnā āṯam kai rang. 
      When shall I see my Lord with the delight of my soul? 
        ਜਾਗਨ ਤੇ ਸੁਪਨਾ ਭਲਾ ਬਸੀਐ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਸੰਗਿ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ 
      जागन ते सुपना भला बसीऐ प्रभ संगि ॥१॥ रहाउ ॥ 
      Jāgan ṯe supnā bẖalā basī▫ai parabẖ sang. ||1|| rahā▫o. 
      That dream is better that than waking wherein I abide with my Master. Pause.  SGGS ji Ang 816 🙏🏻 Dhan Guru Arjan Dev ji   ਮਃ ੫ ॥ 
      मः ५ ॥ 
      Mėhlā 5. 
      5th Guru. 
        ਸਜਣ ਮੁਖੁ ਅਨੂਪੁ ਅਠੇ ਪਹਰ ਨਿਹਾਲਸਾ ॥ 
      सजण मुखु अनूपु अठे पहर निहालसा ॥ 
      Sajaṇ mukẖ anūp aṯẖe pahar nihālsā. 
      Incomparable beauty is of the face of my Friend. I would see Him eight watches through. 
        ਸੁਤੜੀ ਸੋ ਸਹੁ ਡਿਠੁ ਤੈ ਸੁਪਨੇ ਹਉ ਖੰਨੀਐ ॥੨॥ 
      सुतड़ी सो सहु डिठु तै सुपने हउ खंनीऐ ॥२॥ 
      Suṯ▫ṛī so saho diṯẖ ṯai supne ha▫o kẖannī▫ai. ||2|| 
      In sleep I saw that Spouse of mine. Unto that dream, I am a sacrifice.  SGGS ji Ang 1100 🙏🏻 Dhan Guru Arjan Dev jI
    • I think this debate could go on for a while, mt issue with people saying "mona" is the simple fact that i know Punjabi's with cut hair that respect and adhere to Sikhi more than ones with a dastaar and even fully grown beards, as far as flying under the radar, there are plenty of us out there with a pagh on our heads that do that, it's not restricted to those that have cut hair. Sarbjit Singh from Rajoanatv is a highly regarded human rights activist, the man know's more about injustices done to Sikhs than anyone I know, he's a "mona", i've never seen him fly under the radar. Like i said, we could debate forever, everyone has their own opinion and though process.
    • Though I like reading philosophy. Reading Epictetus after some Seneca and Marcus Aurelius, it's not a patch on Gurbani. But the ancient Greeks and Roman had some good ideas and they had some ideas of the divine  (not their Pantheon of God's like Zeus/Jupiter etc.) If anything it was more advanced than when they took up those Judeo -Christian beliefs.  Some of their thinking was more in-line with Dharmic thinking. 
    • Simran345, here is a pangti on SGGS 558, it seems to be talking about darshan which happened in a dream. Now sleep is being called as blessed so that the darshan of God can happen again. ਇਕੁ ਨ ਰੁਨਾ ਮੇਰੇ ਤਨ ਕਾ ਬਿਰਹਾ ਜਿਨਿ ਹਉ ਪਿਰਹੁ ਵਿਛੋੜੀ ॥ 
      इकु न रुना मेरे तन का बिरहा जिनि हउ पिरहु विछोड़ी ॥ 
      Ik na runā mere ṯan kā birhā jin ha▫o pirahu vicẖẖoṛī. 
      But one thing, my Body's soul weeps not, which has separated me from my beloved. 
      ਪਰ ਇਕ ਸ਼ੈ, ਮੇਰੀ ਦੇਹ ਦੀ ਵਿਛੁੜੀ ਹੋਈ ਆਤਮਾ ਰੋਂਦੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਮੇਰੇ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਮ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਵੱਖ ਕਰ ਛੱਡਿਆ ਹੈ। 
        ਸੁਪਨੈ ਆਇਆ ਭੀ ਗਇਆ ਮੈ ਜਲੁ ਭਰਿਆ ਰੋਇ ॥ 
      सुपनै आइआ भी गइआ मै जलु भरिआ रोइ ॥ 
      Supnai ā▫i▫ā bẖī ga▫i▫ā mai jal bẖari▫ā ro▫e. 
      He came to me in my dream and again went away, upon which I wept copious tears. 
      ਉਹ ਮੇਰੇ ਸੁਫਨੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੇਰੇ ਕੋਲ ਆਇਆ ਅਤੇ ਫੇਰ ਚਲਿਆ ਗਿਆ, ਜਿਸ ਉਤੇ ਮੈਂ ਹੰਝੂ ਭਰ ਕੇ ਰੋਈ। 
        ਆਇ ਨ ਸਕਾ ਤੁਝ ਕਨਿ ਪਿਆਰੇ ਭੇਜਿ ਨ ਸਕਾ ਕੋਇ ॥ 
      आइ न सका तुझ कनि पिआरे भेजि न सका कोइ ॥ 
      Ā▫e na sakā ṯujẖ kan pi▫āre bẖej na sakā ko▫e. 
      I cannot come to Thee, O my love, nor can I send any one. 
      ਮੈਂ ਤੇਰੇ ਕੋਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਆ ਸਕਦੀ, ਹੇ ਮੇਰੇ ਦਿਲਬਰ! ਨਾਂ ਹੀ ਮੈਂ ਕਿਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਘਲ ਸਕਦੀ ਹਾਂ। 
        ਆਉ ਸਭਾਗੀ ਨੀਦੜੀਏ ਮਤੁ ਸਹੁ ਦੇਖਾ ਸੋਇ ॥ 
      आउ सभागी नीदड़ीए मतु सहु देखा सोइ ॥ 
      Ā▫o sabẖāgī nīḏ▫ṛī▫e maṯ saho ḏekẖā so▫e. 
      Come, O fortunate sleep perhaps I may again, behold that Husband of mine (in dreams). 
      ਆ ਜਾ, ਹੇ ਭਾਗਾਂ ਵਾਲੀਏ ਨੀਂਦ੍ਰੇ! ਸ਼ਾਇਦ ਮੈਂ ਆਪਣੇ ਉਸ ਭਰਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਮੁੜ (ਸੁਪਨੇ ਵਿੱਚ) ਤੱਕ ਲਵਾਂ।      Or do you suppose its meaning is actually different to what is translated ?
×