Jump to content
NonExistant

Chaare Sahibzaade Past Lives???

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, sikhni777 said:

SGGS ANG 462

Jin manas te devte kiye 

The above line clearly states that men were converted into angels or devte by Guruji. Not vice versa.....

This should clear some amount of doubt.

The punj peyare were clearly normal human beings,  randomly chosen by Guruji from all castes so that there can be a total representation of all in the khalsa.

Saying that they were jivan mukat before undermines the power of amrit which Guruji gave to them.  If they were jivan mukat and all that powerful- why did they need amrit? Why did they offer their heads.

Guruji did not pick and choose jivan mukat people from the crowd.  If he wanted jivan mukats he would have chosen them himself. He is the all knowing powerful and can read people's hearts and knows the spiritual status of all.

There was no pick and choose.  All five who offered their heads were brought back to life after taking amrit.

Oh ok. I guess i was told wrong information. Thanks for clearing it up.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NonExistant said:

Can i ask which devta took birth into a sikh household? I would like to know.

 

Also i heard that some of the first panj pyare were saints in their past lives who attained mukti (liberation) and chose to come back into birth to be part of the khalsa.

There's millions of devtas around, This was part of a book I read a while ago, I had it lying around so i'll dig it up and upload the extract here. 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Kira said:

There's millions of devtas around, This was part of a book I read a while ago, I had it lying around so i'll dig it up and upload the extract here. 

 

I wanna read it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/10/2017 at 1:32 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

Do you have it available? If people are making these claims, I'd like to know what their reasoning is.

clip downloaded above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/16/2017 at 7:45 PM, NonExistant said:

I wanna read it.

took me a while but I found the book and the passage. 

2ywffar.jpg

 

iy0xs2.png

 

Just remember that within Kaal Purkh (the lord) there are millions upon millions of Vishnus, Shivas, Brahmas, Indras and so on.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see such great scholars we have...or should I say internet Gianni

It was Sant Gurbachan Singh of Binderkala who FIRST said this about the Sahibzade and is available in his mp3 CDs

I don't see why Ultra kattar illiterate tunnel vision Sikhs cannot see the relationship between devteh and Sikhism perhaps if you listened to all the CDS you would have some foundation knowledge such as Nanaksar Sarovar helped built by Devteh and Baoli Sahib Well connects to Ganges, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Just  giving darshan in the form of Ramachandra, there many proofs of this such as Bhagat being previously devteh

BTW ALOT OF MODERN KATHA AND SAMPARDAI KATHA IS TAKEN FROM THE SANT GURBACHAN SINGH CDS

Edited by singh598
  • Confused 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This myth is actually found in the Gurbilas Patshahi Dasvi. A few months back the controversial Iqbal Deen, Jathedar of Patna Sahib, narrated it from on-stage. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Kira said:

took me a while but I found the book and the passage. 

2ywffar.jpg

 

iy0xs2.png

 

Just remember that within Kaal Purkh (the lord) there are millions upon millions of Vishnus, Shivas, Brahmas, Indras and so on.

What Is the name of this book please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I have read somewhere that a brahma has a certain age which is not equal to the other devte. Then he passes away. So these devte are actually engaged in some sort of seva. SGGS also acknowledges the presence of millions of indras, shivjis, brahmas and vishnus. I think I have posted this somewhere in the bhagti forum.

So was it just 4 of these who required mukti and were born as the sahibzadhe, if that is what people are trying to say.

Why did not Guru Gobind Singh Ji tell us directly about them. Would it not have sorted out a lot of controversies which we keep going through. 

For instance if the hindus worship Brahma, vishnu, shivji and Indra - which particular ones of the millions do they worship? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/10/2017 at 0:21 AM, Kira said:

I saw something like this on Sikhawareness too, can someone provide sources? 

 

Though devtas taking birth into Sikh households isn't a new phenomenon, there's several records to it happening due to the Devtas desire to attain Waheguru too. 

which confirms what guru ji has said that they are just as subject to panj chor /maya as others 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

What Is the name of this book please?

God through Gurbani & Science. The writer of the book has done a-lot of research and almost all of writing within the book reference Brahmgyanis, scholars and other mahapurkhs as the source of what he put down. If there's anything in particular you want to read I an upload it here, I really don't mind. Or message me and I'll send you it.

3 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

Also I have read somewhere that a brahma has a certain age which is not equal to the other devte. Then he passes away. So these devte are actually engaged in some sort of seva. SGGS also acknowledges the presence of millions of indras, shivjis, brahmas and vishnus. I think I have posted this somewhere in the bhagti forum.

 

The hierarchy is something like Indra<Brahma<Shiva<Vishnu<Maya

As one passes another takes his place, same for the other trinity. 

Quote

So was it just 4 of these who required mukti and were born as the sahibzadhe, if that is what people are trying to say.

Why did not Guru Gobind Singh Ji tell us directly about them. Would it not have sorted out a lot of controversies which we keep going through. 

Guru Ji wanted us to worship the Supreme Lord, not the Devtas. I'm speculating here (as I could never hope to understand what Akaal Purkh Saroop Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj was thinking) but if these secrets were all released at the time then there was nothing stopping the Hindus just worshipping a respected Sahibzaade to continue Devta pooja. 

The universe is so mysterious and vast, heck if you read other scriptures there's interesting details about why certain avatars of Vishnu had to take birth through the womb. These facts are omitted from other texts.

Quote

For instance if the hindus worship Brahma, vishnu, shivji and Indra - which particular ones of the millions do they worship? 
 

Probably the ones that are contained to our brahmand (Galaxy) since each region has its own trinity. 

Again im just speculating.

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

which confirms what guru ji has said that they are just as subject to panj chor /maya as others 

You dont need to tell me that penji :) the main issue arises when everyone tries to link Sikhi into everything, rather than treating it like a full picture they see it as a jigsaw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 13Mirch said:

This myth is actually found in the Gurbilas Patshahi Dasvi. A few months back the controversial Iqbal Deen, Jathedar of Patna Sahib, narrated it from on-stage. 

That was the issue to begin with, I had heard this but I could never find the source to it. Which made it controversial to some people. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So people STILL ACTUALLY believe that sahibzade are reincarnations of vishnu brahma, indra and shiva?????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What about Gurbani? I never said we should change Gurbani, because we can’t. But we can remove Perso-Arabic influences from our vernacular.  And when did I say that we should all begin to speak Hindi and Sanskrit, no that’s a terrible idea. We need to revise Punjabi, and you can call me whatever you like, but I firmly stand by that. Have you forgotten that the very tyrants that killed our Gurus, the Sahibzaades, slaughtered our men, our women, and children, sold our ancestors as slaves, pillaged our land for centuries imposed Perso-Arabic influences onto our language. If we have any ounce of self respect, we should purge those influences from our language.  How am I demoting Punjabi? How am I saying we should stray away from Gurmukhi? In fact if you read any of my other threads you will realize I advocate further development of Gurmukhi and Punjabi. Why are you accusing me of things that I am opposed against in the first place?
    • The Saroop is only similar externally, ideologically there is a world of difference: https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2017/04/01/panj/
    • I began to realize, albeit a bit too late, that there really wasn’t any point in arguing with Jagsaw any further. But I gave the poster some benefit of doubt. But thank you for reassuring me that I wasn’t wrong in my judgment.
    • Kick out Gurwant from the Gurdwara. Do this to every Indian politician unless they prove they deserve otherwise. But for pete's sake what is "ehdi shame shame kro," have a discussion with him, and make him reveal his true colours. 
    • ok duniya for example was used in Gurbani so what then ?...I think Punjabi was selected as it has elements of all parts of society represented and is lok boli ...Tej seems to want to turn revisionist  as the deluded hinduvta folks are doing  ...surely as Sikhs we can be evenhanded and preserve our maa boli without chopping it up into shreds. It is not a major thing if we say odd words here and there , I mean if you were so incensed by the historical insults of mughals then what would you do about hindi /sanskrit as the pushers of those cultural languages have attacked Harmandir Sahib Four times in 70 years, reneged on promises, stolen water, dishonoured our womenfolk and murdered our men ? And now try to demote your language and its Guru-given script as secondary to Thug's languages  
×