Jump to content

Secret factors behind immense muslim reproductive success ??


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

imagine generating five, six , seven kids with no medical care,

This trend of having five,six,seven kids is gone.It was common in 1990s but now a days I don't see any couple having more than 3 children.I myself have two siblings.

 

9 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

the projected population for Pakistan in 2030 is 250million , given the lack of infrastructure : crop security, water security we could be looking at the birthplace of the food and water wars , guess what you think India is going to protect the border along our state???

only if population keep growing at the same rate which i doubt it will. total fertility rate in Pak has been reduced to 2.68.Which will further decrease as women are getting educated. the only reason we have brought our TFR to 2.68 is women education, and we achieved this rate without adopting Chinese type draconian one child policy.In the next decade our population would be stabilized so no need to panic.Anyways India would be the last place our people will migrate.They can barely feed their own people.It is India which you should be worried about which is going to replace China as most populous country in few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our guru sahibs gave countless of practical examples that numbers DO NOT matter at all. “Sava Lakh se ek ladauoon”. Modern history example - Saragarhi. Another example that  Sikhs beaten the Mughals whose kings are still holding the 4th position of the richest human ever recorded in human history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

This trend of having five,six,seven kids is gone.It was common in 1990s but now a days I don't see any couple having more than 3 children.I myself have two siblings.

 

only if population keep growing at the same rate which i doubt it will. total fertility rate in Pak has been reduced to 2.68.Which will further decrease as women are getting educated. the only reason we have brought our TFR to 2.68 is women education, and we achieved this rate without adopting Chinese type draconian one child policy.In the next decade our population would be stabilized so no need to panic.Anyways India would be the last place our people will migrate.They can barely feed their own people.It is India which you should be worried about which is going to replace China as most populous country in few years.

was looking for the article where pakistani women were being interviewed the real bearers of this crazy  mentalities burden...they were being told that they could only visit docs for antenatal care and to stop generating kids was judged to be immoral. Some have snuck implants because their husbands are absent fathers in economic terms using that quote that 'Allah will provide ' whilst ignoring their kids' needs and failure to thrive. Chances of fertility dropping to that level is very slim as it is at 2.8 now and education is being controlled and pruned to suit the continued progeny generation agenda . I feel sorry for them , trapped in a powerless situation . the urban scene is not the majority effect but a smaller trend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

they were being told that they could only visit docs for antenatal care and to stop generating kids was judged to be immoral. Some have snuck implants because their husbands are absent fathers in economic terms using that quote that 'Allah will provide ' whilst ignoring their kids' needs and failure to thrive. Chances of fertility dropping to that level is very slim as it is at 2.8

Like I said mainly women with no education tend to have more children.Yes education is quite controlled but still there are a few professors in every university with atheist or communist leanings and even in some good colleges too.Such people who think outside the box greatly influence their students though process. Educated women rarely have more kids.Why do you thinkg TFR has dropped from 6.05 in 1990 to 2.64 in 2017 ? that too without any concrete effort from govt.It will reach to replacement level in a decade or so.The only reason for this decrease in TFR is women education.People are seeing the benefit of having less children.With less kids you can provide them good education and better living standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

Like I said mainly women with no education tend to have more children.Yes education is quite controlled but still there are a few professors in every university with atheist or communist leanings and even in some good colleges too.Such people who think outside the box greatly influence their students though process. Educated women rarely have more kids.Why do you thinkg TFR has dropped from 6.05 in 1990 to 2.64 in 2017 ? that too without any concrete effort from govt.It will reach to replacement level in a decade or so.The only reason for this decrease in TFR is women education.People are seeing the benefit of having less children.With less kids you can provide them good education and better living standard.

how do you see the increased taliban influence in the touchy area of education of females as they are not known to be tolerant of doctors, teachers for females?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

how do you see the increased taliban influence in the touchy area of education of females as they are not known to be tolerant of doctors, teachers for females?

this is whole another subject not related to TFR rate. And who says an educated person can't be terrorist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Kira said:

Good looks? lmao. 

I think OP has an inferiority complex here.

I don't have an inferiority complex on myself. I can tell a good looking person from not good looking when I see them.

Hindu women chasing after muslim men is pretty common sight in india. However hindu men out of fear will never court a muslim woman. We see it in bollywood all the time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use