Jump to content

Area's where muslims migrate to then usually most non-muslims tend to move and flight


superkaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/22/2017 at 10:00 AM, proactive said:

o Sikh prisoners are roughly the same percentage as the Sikh population as a whole. HOWEVER Muslims are three times their number in prison as in the total population. 

Thanks for that. The numbers that I posted from the websites linked to by the Qwe123 poster may have been skewed because when you only have 30 Sikhs in a jail, even a few more or a few less Sikhs can dramatically change the percentages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, superkaur said:

What a weird post. So you dont see a problem and your advocating Islamification of non-muslim area's and muslim take over right?

Are you able to read? Go back and read my post again quoting exactly where I'm advocating Islamification of non-muslim area's and a Muslim take over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

As long as there is a generous welfare state I would say they are net consumers instead of net contributers. 

The more generous the welfare state of a country, the more belligerent they become. 

Prominent UK Muslim leader Anjem Choudary encourages Muslims to get on state welfare benefits because that's a form of Jaziya tax being paid by kaffirs to Muslims:

 

Quote

 

Anjem Choudary was secretly filmed mocking non-Muslims for working in 9-5 jobs their whole lives, and told followers that some revered Islamic figures had only ever worked one or two days a year.

“The rest of the year they were busy with jihad [holy war] and things like that,” he said. “People will say, ‘Ah, but you are not working’.

“But the normal situation is for you to take money from the kuffar [non-believers].

“So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance. You need to get support.”

He went on to tell a 30-strong crowd: “We are going to take England — the Muslims are coming.”

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9875954/Muslim-preacher-urges-followers-to-claim-Jihad-Seekers-Allowance.html

He goes on to make fun of people who work a 9-5 job, waking up at 7am.

I guess he must wake up at 10 or 11am, having spent most of the night browsing Osama bin Laden's recommended porn collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/22/2017 at 11:33 AM, Ranjeet01 said:

One of the top reasons for the muslim prison population was for drugs but wonder if the grooming cases has usurped that?

You mean the cases for which the politicians don't want that community to be prosecuted?

On 9/22/2017 at 11:33 AM, Ranjeet01 said:

 

If the authorities pulled their finger out and detained all those returnee "tourists" from Iraq and Syria, the  muslim prison population would "explode" (pardon the pun).

Well, Europeans are too busy giving returning jihadis housing and benefits to detain them:

Swedish city to offer returning Isis fighters housing and benefits in reintegration programme

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-isis-fighters-city-lund-returning-jihadis-housing-job-education-benefits-reintegration-a7371266.html

You couldn't make this stuff up even if you tried. :hairan:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2017 at 7:28 PM, superkaur said:

I've been noticing this trend of so called "white flight" where the white people fled area's in the west where non-white communities had migrated into. However this is usually seen in the lense of the whites being racist and they only wanting to be with their own race of people. I however disagree I dont think its a mostly racist migration of whites to "white area's" I would say its a flight from area's that become more economically poor or culturally they cant relate to.

Well, I think there are multiple reasons for white flight.

One reason is that some (but not all) white people flee whenever they happen to see more than 1 token brown person. I agree that it's hard to live in an area that has become unsafe because you care for your children, but fleeing merely because there's a non-white in the neighborhood is racist and totally unnecessary.

I would not fault people for moving, though, if they had encountered or heard of multiple unsafe situations due to aggression by certain communities. I don't think Sikhs or Hindus (or Buddhist, Orientals, etc.) engage in that kind of behavior. They're not looking to create exclusive enclaves in order to enforce Rehat Maryada (not that Rehat is binding on non-Sikhs in the first place, other than a gurdwara).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2017 at 7:46 PM, superkaur said:

Same thing happened to southall only 20 years ago it was well established punjabi sikh and hindu area but there was signs islam is creeping in with pakistani's moving in taking over the restaurants and Somalian refugee's being put up in tax payer funded flats and moved there permanently.

It's dumbfounding to know that refugees are being accommodated at taxpayer expense. Why oh why? How stupid exactly are European/American politicians? It's one thing to give someone a meal the same day they come into the country, but not for months and years ata  time. Did the small number of Sikhs who claimed asylum sit around all day doing nothing and collecting benefits? I doubt it.

If nothing else, you can become an apprentice and you can learn the basics of a trade in a few weeks or months and start earning honest money.

Or you can learn English. But we know they have other priorities (like watching Anjem Choudary Youtube videos).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BhForce said:

You mean the cases for which the politicians don't want that community to be prosecuted?

Well, Europeans are too busy giving returning jihadis housing and benefits to detain them:

Swedish city to offer returning Isis fighters housing and benefits in reintegration programme

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-isis-fighters-city-lund-returning-jihadis-housing-job-education-benefits-reintegration-a7371266.html

You couldn't make this stuff up even if you tried. :hairan:

Sweden is a country which is extremely socialist country but is also a country that is highly conformist (talking amongst the native swedes here) which means if they will go against the grain and speak out, they are looked down upon. 

Plus the fact they have not fought a war in 200 years means that they are not used to conflict.

Hard to believe this is the land of Vikings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BhForce said:

It's dumbfounding to know that refugees are being accommodated at taxpayer expense. Why oh why? How stupid exactly are European/American politicians? It's one thing to give someone a meal the same day they come into the country, but not for months and years ata  time. Did the small number of Sikhs who claimed asylum sit around all day doing nothing and collecting benefits? I doubt it.

If nothing else, you can become an apprentice and you can learn the basics of a trade in a few weeks or months and start earning honest money.

Or you can learn English. But we know they have other priorities (like watching Anjem Choudary Youtube videos).

The elites wants a population that they believe will not question their authority.

Refugees provide vote banks and having them on welfare means there is no skin in the game.

The elites want a dumb, compliant society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Plus the fact they have not fought a war in 200 years means that they are not used to conflict.

Hard to believe this is the land of Vikings.

Yes, good point. I think this is the reason Guru Sahib granted us the Rehit. The Rehit keeps us tough. We're meant to engage in sword-play and ride horses, and the rest of the Nihang lifestyle. But we've become weak. Sikhs ask, "Why do we have to have a kirpan if there's no war on. And if there's a criminal, we can just call 911, 100, or 999 on our iPhone?" It's people like that which lead to ridiculous stuff like Sweden giving housing benefits to returning Jihadis instead of throwing them in the slammer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use