Is khalsa aid wasting sangats resources on muslim rohingya?

[YOYO29]

17 minutes ago, proactive said:

It's actually the reverse. The radicalisation of non-muslim countries has been because of Islamic terrorism. Had there been no 9/11 and the subsequent Islamic terrorism there would have been no Trump. 

Exactly my point.Before 9/11 there was no Islamic terrorism. Even to this day a large majority of Muslims refuse to believe that 9/11 was done by Muslims because they are good people at heart and they believe that it is not right to kill innocent human beings. Bin laden used Palestinian card to attract Muslim youth towards his cause. When you talk about Muslim terrorism also keep in geopolitics in mind. As like Sikh terrorists who blew Air India flight in 1980s. This action can only be examined taking into consideration the situation in Punjab.

[YOYO29]

13 minutes ago, proactive said:

But how can you reform Islam when the best example of the followers of Mohammed are ISIS, Al Qaida and Taliban? You cannot reform Islam you can only discard it. Be honest the world would be a better place were there no one following Islam.

Same thing people said about Christianty. But u see Christianty has been reformed.There is no way that 1.8 billion people would discard Islam as first thing in the morning just because right wing sikhs, hindus  or white don't like it. Reformation is the practical solution.There is no other way.People have emotional attachment with religion. Even a person like myself who is completly aware that Quran is nothing but creation of Muhammad's own minbd find it hard to hard dicard my identity as a Muslim.You can imagine the level of attachment practicing Muslims would have.

Al qaeda,Taliban,Boko Haram all of them are followers of strict wahhabi ideology. This wahhabi sect does not even amount to 1% of global Muslim population yet they somehow have managed to get all media attention and portray themselves as true representative of global Muslim community.This needs to change.

[YOYO29]

12 hours ago, proactive said:

The Rohingyas are a part of the demographic jihad, there is no such Sikh demographic jihad in Malaysia so your comparison fails.

As i said ealier there is no such thing as demographic jihad.It is in your head and your like minded right wingers.Burmese govt does not want Rohangya because they are not part of burmese society.That's the sole reason.Even to this day Burma govt maintaned that Rohangya are not citizens of Burma they came from British India.You see that's the reason they are being massacred and driven out of Burma.Like East African countries did with Sikhs and Indian in 1980s drving them out of their countries. Which demographic Jihad were those Indian  Sikhs doing in African countries ? If Malaysian govt start doing the same with Indian/Sikh migrants in Malaysia driving them out of Malaysia following the Burma govt's logic that Indian and Sikhs are not part of malaysian society they came from India.You would be the first one to say "see how these sullay are evil they can't tolerate non muslims."

[YOYO29]

6 hours ago, superkaur said:

Whereas islam has 50+ countries as its state religion and vast area's of land and resources where rohingyas could be resettled and accommodated also the muslim illegal migrants and refugee's that headed to europe have no business being in non-muslim lands they should be settled in muslim rich lands to live the islamic life their faith requires.

Here is list by UNHCR of top countries hosting refugess : 

http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2017/2/58b001ab4/poorer-countries-host-forcibly-displaced-report-shows.html

Top refugee hosting countries

1. Jordan (2.7 million+) 
2. Turkey (2.5 million+)

3. Pakistan (1.6 million)  
4. Lebanon (1.5 million+)

5. Iran (979,400)

All top five countries are Muslim majorities. Most people would like to settle in Europe as Europe and North America offers better facilities. So naturally people are attractive to it. Moreover West has its hand in destabilization of Middle East.It was west which destabilized Middle East by invading Iraq in 2003.And since then middle east is a mess.So the least west can do is take some refugees. And you are not really in position to tell Muslims where they should stay and live.You people yourself are immigrants in west so you can't really be telling other immigrants to stay away from west. You know when your brethren were thrown out from East African countries.They did not migrate to India or Punjab.Majority of them also came to Europe.

[akaltaksal]

1 hour ago, YOYO29 said:

In india you have Modi.In Ameica you have Trump so in that scenrio you can't really blame if some muslim countries start doing the same.

Trump is nowhere near, not even comparable, to what muslim countries are doing. A majority of the population didn't vote for Trump neither is it shifting any further to the right.  It's a separate matter altogether. Same could be somewhat said about Modi. 

and No, I still can blame them. Popularity and commonality does not equate to moral/ethical acceptance. If you seek to divert the attention and focus of scrutiny from one particular problem by pointing at another, it doesn't do your point any justice. Especially when you make a blanket statement such as the above.

 

[akaltaksal]

9 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

Here is list by UNHCR of top countries hosting refugess : 

http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2017/2/58b001ab4/poorer-countries-host-forcibly-displaced-report-shows.html

Top refugee hosting countries

1. Jordan (2.7 million+) 
2. Turkey (2.5 million+)

3. Pakistan (1.6 million)  
4. Lebanon (1.5 million+)

5. Iran (979,400)

All top five countries are Muslim majorities. Most people would like to settle in Europe as Europe and North Alerican offers better facilities. So naturally people are attractive to it. Moreover West has its hand in destabilization of Middle East.It was west which destabilized Middle East by invading Iraq in 2003.And since then middle east is a mess.So the least west can do is take some refugees. And you are not really in position to tell Muslims where they should stay and live.You people yourself are immigrants in west so you can't really be telling other immigrants to stay away from west. You know when your brethren were thrown out from East African countries.They did not migrate to India or Punjab.Majority of them also came to Europe.

It's not about immigration but rather comforty and integration. Something that the muslim population migrating to Europe lacks. Furthermore, Not every European country was involved in the invasion of Iraq and other middle eastern issues, so why should they carry the load of migrants/refugees?  Especially when they are a threat to the culture of the host population.

[akaltaksal]

1 hour ago, YOYO29 said:

There was already a sikh plan to eradicate muslims from east Punjab if partition plan was not according to their satisfaction.They would have done the same regardless of what happend in West Punjab.

That plan was in response to the imminent threat that the Muslim League posed to the Sikh population, as well as the massacre of our people a full year before partition. 

[jkvlondon]

8 minutes ago, akaltaksal said:

It's not about immigration but rather comforty and integration. Something that the muslim population migrating to Europe lacks. Furthermore, Not every European country was involved in the invasion of Iraq and other middle eastern issues, so why should they carry the load of migrants/refugees?  Especially when they are a threat to the culture of the host population.

where does greece and italy fall because their islands are taking loads in

[akaltaksal]

1 hour ago, YOYO29 said:

This is cultural problem.Most people from middle eastern countries lived their entire lives in segregation from women so when they migrate to west they have not idea how to deal with women.When someone  see a women smile at him or even said hello he would assume that she is trying have sex with him.

But you'd have to admit at some point that religion has a hand in shaping such a culture.

[akaltaksal]

5 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

where does greece and italy fall because their islands are taking loads in

I don't quite understand what you're asking. 

However, I can say that Italy has, overwhelmingly, African Economic migrants. Ironically, the far left (I say the far left, as I'm a classical Liberal) only admitted to this fact recently this year, when the truth became too obvious to overlook and cover in a cloak of political correctness.