Jump to content

Is khalsa aid wasting sangats resources on muslim rohingya?


superkaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, chatanga said:

Just before coming on the forum about 10 mins ago, I had a flick through the Sky Tv Channels. At least 8 channels are fundraising for Rohingyas.  I'm pretty sure that the Muslim community will be able to hold their own on this. There are thousands of poor Sikhs (and others) in India who could benefit from that KA help.

I dont want to be mean but there is no doubt in my mind that the international Islamic community would never come through to help the Sikhs.

Muslims care for themselves and their own community.  Thus they should watch over their own kind.  It's survival. 

They won't come to the aid of Sikhs but would be more than happy to dig our graves. 

 

Khalsa Aid and all these other organizations needs to focus and channel their resources to needy Sikh populations across the world, and not to these rohingyas or other muslims, they already have a community to care for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, proactive said:

The Rohingyas are a part of the demographic jihad, there is no such Sikh demographic jihad in Malaysia so your comparison fails. Also the Sikhs are a asset to any nation they migrate to, the same cannot be said of Muslims. Y

Demographic Jihad ??? Complete nonsense n propaganda by anti Muslim , right wing websites.
 

 

11 hours ago, proactive said:

There are still lakhs of Muslim Biharis in Bangladesh who fought on the side of the Pakistan during the Bangladesh war and they haven't been allowed to go to Pakistan in over 40 years and you think Pakistan would allow Rohingyas there! 

First they are Muslims and their religion is not in danger in Bangladesh.There has been some talk of rehabilitating them to Pakistan but I have heard peole saying that you can't control one MQM which is party of Urdu speakers in Karachi;how u gonna control them bihraris if they are allowed in Pakistan.Personally i don't agree with this.Rohangya case is different their religion is in danger as u know Pakistanis go crazy when Islam is in danger card is played.You don't live in Pakistan so u don't know how much sympathy exist for rohangya.Govt would be under severe pressure if they did not allow them to enter in Pakistan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, chatanga said:

Also remember that there was a fair population of Kashmeri Muslims settled in Panjab swelling their number up and taking away so much land they were not entitled to .

What about thoses sikh who migrated to west punjab from eastern district to setlle in new colonies like lyalpur ? thus decreasing their numbers in eastern district.Most Kashmiris settled in Jalandhar and Amritsar.And both of these districts did not become part of Pakistan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, proactive said:

It wasn't a Muslim doing something stupid, it was a Muslim following the dictates of Mohammed treating a non-Muslim girl as his sex slave, the same as Mohammed allowed his followers.

How can you be so sure that he was following muhammad's teaching he might have been hurt by burmese atrocities on his people and tried to take things in his own hand.Can you really say that Sikhs raping Muslim women in East Punjab were following the orders of Guru's ? Or that Sikh mob which attacked a Muslim girl hostel in Amritsar and made these girls walk naked in the streets of Amritsar were doing so because of guru's hukm. Absolutely not.They just wanted revenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, proactive said:

If Rohingya become Sikh or Hindu or even Jehovah's witnesses then they obviously stop being a part of the Islamic demographic jihad and stop being a threat to other Burmese communities and would not be kicked out of Burma. In a Jihad there are obviously two sides and you can't expect Sikhs to support the side that is engaged in trying to amalgamate the area of another country into a Muslim state. 

They have been living in that land for last hundred years or so ,the only problem burmese govt has is that rohngya are not part of burmses society so they are kicking them out.It would make no difference even if they were hindus or sikhs.they would have met same fate.Like East African countries like Kenya did with Sikh/Indian people in 1970s by kicking them out from their countries.But i think you are blind from your hatred of muslims which has been indoctrinated into you right from childhood.And this hatred is clouding your judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use