Jump to content

Today I was not allowed to enter the United States Embassy in London because I was wearing Kirpan


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

This is a hypothetical question, but I will never support homosexual Anand Karaj if that's what your asking. Non-Sikhs and those not doing Anand Karaj around Guru Sahib should have complete freedom to do marriages their way with no discrimination towards them. We should be a "Live and Let Live", culture, (again excluding anything remotely related to Guru Sahib).

And the official leader of Khalistan should be Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

I never mentioned Anand Karaj for gays. My question is what is your opinion for any LGBQT people living in Khalistan? Since you Khalistan wouldn't support it.

So, what will happen when two groups have different interpretation regarding a passage from Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Wouldn't it sort of complicate things? 

4 hours ago, Kira said:

those theme parks were hilarious. The amount of people dancing around like they were in heaven is pretty amusing sight. Though Kabaddi in the villages is just as homoerotic. A bunch of guys in pants wrestling around in the mud...oh dear.

Kabaddi is no where near as bad as those parks! Man's game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
12 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I never mentioned Anand Karaj for gays. My question is what is your opinion for any LGBQT people living in Khalistan? Since you Khalistan wouldn't support it.

I believe I already said, "Live and Let Live". Homosexuals just shouldn't bring it up, and we all can pretend nothing is going on behind closed doors.

Makes it easier for everyone if people kept their fetishes to themselves.

13 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

So, what will happen when two groups have different interpretation regarding a passage from Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Wouldn't it sort of complicate things? 

Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is the light of Vaheguru, it's not really that confusing. If people are confused about Angs and Shabads, they can confirm with Punj Pyare, who'll play an active role is said Khalistan/"Sikh-land", (term I made-up, to ensure that this isn't some secular land). 

But the best part about Khalistan after Guru Sahib owning such land is that there will be no more SGPC rigging systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I believe I already said, "Live and Let Live". Homosexuals just shouldn't bring it up, and we all can pretend nothing is going on behind closed doors.

Makes it easier for everyone if people kept their fetishes to themselves.

Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is the light of Vaheguru, it's not really that confusing. If people are confused about Angs and Shabads, they can confirm with Punj Pyare, who'll play an active role is said Khalistan/"Sikh-land", (term I made-up, to ensure that this isn't some secular land). 

But the best part about Khalistan after Guru Sahib owning such land is that there will be no more SGPC rigging systems.

Don't quite think it's a fetish. "Let's just pretend they don't exist," is a quite a childish concept. One step above criminalizing it. 

 

Well, I mean there are already countless things we can't agree on, I have no doubt people would disagree on this as well. Nor do I think a theocracy would end well. It'd be much easier to create a constitution based on Sikh values. A secular government incorporating the great Sikh values we have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sitokaur said:

too much God is not healthy as nikki declares in article below, and so did a local Gurduara sikh sangat..but too much free living is ok in jalandha jagat?:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2012/aprilweb-only/nikki-haley-faith-interview.html

There are people who is willing to sacrifice their dharam for bit of fame in their life. You have to be Christian in order to win anything in south and Nikki knew this well. She gave up her religion to achieve materialistic goals.

Surprisingly, her fufar (uncle) was a well known gursikh in during 70/80's. My family had a very close relationship for years with her uncle and he also did ardas in my parents wedding. Very well respected person in jathas. Big difference in ideology between them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

I believe our brother here is going thru some disgruntled phase in his life. Taking discussion from declaring kirpan as unsafe weapon which not to be allowed in theme parks to men dancing in water parks in underwear. ?‍♂️

Not at all, it was a reply to Jacfsing discussing theme parks in Punjab. I just had a chance to take a shot at Indian theme parks. 

 

And no where did I say Kirpans are unsafe, no weapon is unsafe, it all depends on who is holding the weapon. And, unfortunately theme park security can't accurately judge who is safe or not after a 10 second pat down. Let's use some logic, shall we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

where did I say Kirpans are unsafe, no weapon is unsafe

? kirpans = weapon. You just mentioned weapon in unsafe. 

12 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Most of these theme parks have anti weapon rules, so it applies to ANYONE armed. Its quite simple really. 

You are confusing yourself. Make up your mind brother on whether kirpan is a weapon or not. Should we have our Khalistan parks states that kirpan, a weapon not be allowed in parks. Yes or no? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Unless we offer some excellent business; I highly doubt the western theme parks will be opening theme parks in Punjab/Khalistan. Even today in India, there's no Disney World.

Our dharam is very liberal when comparing with other dharams. It won't stop anyone opening up theme parks in our country. Our culture believes   in open market. India never believed in open market. Look at 70's emergency and how they took TATA's private Air India under governments wing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use