Jump to content

Today I was not allowed to enter the United States Embassy in London because I was wearing Kirpan


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

? kirpans = weapon. You just mentioned weapon in unsafe. 

You are confusing yourself. Make up your mind brother on whether kirpan is a weapon or not. Should we have our Khalistan parks states that kirpan, a weapon not be allowed in parks. Yes or no? ?

What lol? Kirpan IS a weapon. Weapons are not unsafe on their own, UNLESS in the hands of a unsafe individual who is willing to cause harm to innocents etc.

 

It doesn't matter where the theme park aka business is, they set their own policies. Some states in USA allow concealed carry, but businesses in those states still won't allow weapons inside. 

 

It's really not a difficult concept to understand. Your mind/judgement is clouded and biased because we are discussing Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
3 hours ago, S1ngh said:

Our dharam is very liberal when comparing with other dharams. It won't stop anyone opening up theme parks in our country. Our culture believes   in open market. India never believed in open market. Look at 70's emergency and how they took TATA's private Air India under governments wing. 

I'd rather our people's,(Sikhs), rights be protected, either by someway or another, over us being discriminated in our own country. Sikhs shouldn't be forced to choose between their religion and simply living their lives like @KhoonKaBadlaKhoon seems to be promoting. It doesn't matter whether Kirpan is a weapon or not, it's a part of our Dharam and the racists shouldn't be preventing Sikhs from doing what they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
6 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Don't quite think it's a fetish. "Let's just pretend they don't exist," is a quite a childish concept. One step above criminalizing it. 

 

Well, I mean there are already countless things we can't agree on, I have no doubt people would disagree on this as well. Nor do I think a theocracy would end well. It'd be much easier to create a constitution based on Sikh values. A secular government incorporating the great Sikh values we have. 

Your basically supporting Sikh harassment, with this white supremacist ideology that Sikhs shouldn't be allowed to follow their religion freely. We need Khalistan to support Sikh-interest support not some random person doing whatever they want in the bedroom. Government of any kind shouldn't control people's lives. But again if gays keep quite about it, we can show to the rest of the world we can progress. So any homos, just don't bring it up, and they can do whatever they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I think you just lack reading comprehension, perhaps English isn't your first language. 

Now jumping to another unrelated language issue. Dude stick with one point and stop thinking of Indian men jumping in water parks ?. Weirdo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I think you just lack reading comprehension, perhaps English isn't your first language. 

No english is not my first language. Neither it is be for my kids or even their kids. Punjabi will always be my family's first language. Be proud of who you are. Go watch Malcom X movie and maybe you will learn something from there.

Now we are jumping to another unrelated language issue. Dude stick with one point and stop thinking of Indian men jumping in water parks. I still have no idea why you were thinking of bhaiyas dancing in the water parks. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use