Did Winston Churchill & British Establishment deliberately want partition and deadly violence in punjab

[YOYO29]

From historical perspective ; Punjabi had never been a state language.Even during Ranjit Singh era persian was the language of state.It is only in recent times that Punjabi got official status.

[YOYO29]

On 9/12/2017 at 2:36 AM, chatanga said:

Gurdaspur had a muslim majority of 0.1%. The majority of the Muslims of Gurdaspur lived in the one of the tehsils that was awarded to Pakistan. Their numbers in Zaffarwal tehsil was a lot and the population in this tehsil was much greater than the others. That is why Gurdaspur had an extremely slight numerical advantage but when the situation was moved from a district level to e Tehsil, this decision was right.

Partition was done on the basis of districts.If it had been done on tehsil basis then we had a very good claim on two muslim majority tehsil in firozpur ,Zira 65 % ,Ferozpur 55 %tehsils were majority muslims.Ajnala tehsil in Amritsar was also Muslim majority.And about Gurdas pur, most muslims in gurdaspur district lived in Batala where they were 55 percent of tehsil population.There were four tehsils of Gurdaspur out of which only Pathankot was Hindu majority rest were muslim majority.

On 9/12/2017 at 2:36 AM, chatanga said:

Muslims in Panjab were 55% of the population yet were rewarded 61 of the land mass. That in itself was extremely unfair.

Are you talking about just british punjab or whole punjab including princely states ?

[Premi5]

20 hours ago, chatanga said:

 

 

I have many books on Pakistan, and Kashmir, (many unread yet as I have that many), but if you think the tribaks invaded because they wanted to avenge muslim deaths in Jammu, you have been mislead. 

 

Can you tell us some titles, as I would like to get from local library or online please

[akaltaksal]

On 9/9/2017 at 0:12 AM, YOYO29 said:

But I can easily have a conversation with an Indian Punjabi without any difficulty and also I can completely understand any Indian Punjabi movies.So I would say language has not changed so much.

I didn't say it changed to a point of losing intelligibility. It changed enough to be noticable.

[akaltaksal]

On 9/11/2017 at 2:36 PM, chatanga said:

 I dont know why you want to peddle Pakistani state narratives here.

 

Why is he/she even here? 

[YOYO29]

9 hours ago, akaltaksal said:

Why is he/she even here? 

I thought this was an open forum. Aren't non sikhs welcome here ?

[Ranjeet01]

It cannot be said to be Indian Punjabi or Pakistani Punjab but obviously there are going to be differences in accents and dialects. 

Also, it's been over 70 years. Accents/Dialects and languages do change over time.

If you watch an old black and white film and compare the English with what's spoken today, it will be intelligible but it is not how it is spoken today.

Can we expect any different with Punjabi?

[S1ngh]

36 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

I thought this was an open forum. Aren't non sikhs welcome here ?

It is open forum but a platform for everyone to promote only Sikh culture, history and religion. While we do tolerate some trolls trying to push non-Sikh agenda but we believe in respecting freedom of speech but there are always limit. ✌️

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

59 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

I thought this was an open forum. Aren't non sikhs welcome here ?

I for one welcome your insight. You aren't here spouting off biased p.o.v's. 

[YOYO29]

39 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

It is open forum but a platform for everyone to promote only Sikh culture, history and religion. While we do tolerate some trolls trying to push non-Sikh agenda but we believe in respecting freedom of speech but ther

can you show me where did i try to promote anti sikh propaganda ?

 

15 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I for one welcome your insight. You aren't here spouting off biased p.o.v's. 

Thanks man