Jump to content

Did Winston Churchill & British Establishment deliberately want partition and deadly violence in punjab


superkaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, YOYO29 said:

You forgot to add sikhray in your list of bootlickers. Sikhs were as much bootlickers of Britishers as any other community in Punjab this is evident from the fact the Sikh were disproportionatels y represented in British Indian army and fought their wars.Today's Sikh often keep harping on this fact that how they fought for british and in return britishers did nothing for them.

Even those soldier who shot at unarmed people in Jallianwala Bagh included Sikh soldiers along with Baloch,Gurkha and pathan soldiers.When it comes to boot licking every community is in the same boat. 

sikhray weren't put at the head of anything except in front line positions against tough opponents like the Chinese ... in Punjab it was the big two faiths  running things  , the few government positions held by sikhs were vacated by the brahmin/musley on independence and laws supporting sikh seperateness like the Anand Karaj Act were removed fron statute books. The British weren't stupid they always adopted the toughest fighters for their armies and the sikhs were prepared to go above and beyond because of their philosophy so were almost 'supersoldiers' in that respect. 

The problem with sikhs is that they think naively that the rest of the faiths/countrghalsies have the same imaan and approach to matters as them i.e. total honesty ...why is it Guru Pita ji insisted that we shouldn't trust ANYONE who gives Oaths or Promises on their deity...to study the rajneeti of the brahmin Chankaya?  He was trying to avoid wide-eyed innocence become the downfall of his children. Studying history of war and conquests across the world is necessary, as is study of other faiths to understand the mindset and not fall victim to their underhandedness. 

This past fortnight (two weeks for USA peeps) i've been in Ireland  and reading /listening to techniques used against the Gaelic speaking Irish to control and subdue them is simply a listing of the playbook used across the globe including Punjab. We have been subjected to methods pefected over two centuries in ireland, Wales and Scotland . They are fighting back by reinstating their languages and cultures, we need to do the same .

Churchill hated the Hindus for their subservient obsequiousness... he knew they were cowards and manipulators, he admired sikhs for their courage on the battlefield but he had the hots for Muslims especially the Mughals he fancied himself as a type of Pasha and often dressed up that way . My feeling is he was about power and its acquisition, born in aristo circles so admired absolutely powerful figures with delusions brought on by orientalist tomes i.e. that there was a golden age brought by Islam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JSinghnz said:

Not' 'supersoldiers' they were just naïve 'slavesoldiers' who were used by British.

 

'Supersoldiers' as in ultimate military ideal  - fights like anything despite being paid less, given lesser equipment, smaller widow pensions then regular soldiers and dies without questioning anything often using their example to entrap further generations by quoting pyrrhic victories .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

why is it Guru Pita ji insisted that we shouldn't trust ANYONE who gives Oaths or Promises on their deity...

This was due to his bad experience with Mughals.But I don't believe in generalizing people by the actions of few.I know some people who,when asked to prove their innocence by swearing on Quran they refused to do so even though they were right.Here in Punjab ,people don't swear on quran even if they are right.I have known such people.They fear that we will receive divine retribution for involving Quran in their petty worldly disputes.This is one view and on the other hand i have heard about people taking false oath on Quran. So when your guru says not to trust people who takes oath on his scripture,he is saying this because of his own bad experience with Mughals.This is his own opinion and not eternal truth. Though it is binding on his followers.

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

there was a golden age brought by Islam 

Indeed there was golden age of Islam when science flourished in Islamic lands whereas Europe was still a feudal society.But those Muslim scientists were secular  and liberal and some of them even criticized Muhammad and claimed that there is no such thing as angles and life after death.Jews fleeing Europe found refuge in Muslim World.Such were those days.And now a days we can't even tolerate a muslim of different sect let alone giving refuge to a non Muslim.

Back on bootlicking i think anyone looking at british history of India can see that every community in Punjab served british but if u don't want to accept it it is upto you.

I think this discussion has diverted a lot.PLz stick to the topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

This was due to his bad experience with Mughals.But I don't believe in generalizing people by the actions of few.I know some people who,when asked to prove their innocence by swearing on Quran they refused to do so even though they were right.Here in Punjab ,people don't swear on quran even if they are right.I have known such people.They fear that we will receive divine retribution for involving Quran in their petty worldly disputes.This is one view and on the other hand i have heard about people taking false oath on Quran. So when your guru says not to trust people who takes oath on his scripture,he is saying this because of his own bad experience with Mughals.This is his own opinion and not eternal truth. Though it is binding on his followers.

Indeed there was golden age of Islam when science flourished in Islamic lands whereas Europe was still a feudal society.But those Muslim scientists were secular  and liberal and some of them even criticized Muhammad and claimed that there is no such thing as angles and life after death.Jews fleeing Europe found refuge in Muslim World.Such were those days.And now a days we can't even tolerate a muslim of different sect let alone giving refuge to a non Muslim.

Back on bootlicking i think anyone looking at british history of India can see that every community in Punjab served british but if u don't want to accept it it is upto you.

I think this discussion has diverted a lot.PLz stick to the topic.

also hill rajas went against their saugand too ...this is conveniently forgotten  by most and the actual words of Guru Pita ji covers all Oaths , and look  at history when we trusted the Promises and oaths of anyone what happened ? fall of Sikh Raj , abandonment of treaties, rejection of our rights in the new republic...the list goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
4 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

because it is politically in correct to say anything which is remotely anti Hindu.It always amazes when i see some people here who remember mughal atrocities (which should be remembered as mughals committed horrible atrocities on sikhs,no denying that) while ignoring the role of some hindu who betrayed sikh gurus i.e Lahore's finance minister chandoo shah who very pissed when Guru Arjan Devji refused to wed his son to his daughter.And from that moment he made his mission to take revenge of this humiliation from Guru.I don't advocate that all hindus should be held accountable for this.But I do say that we should not cherry pick history.Speak truth always

Sikhs already know about Chandu Shah, Sujja Nand, Lakhpat Rai, the Hill Rajas, and many others. We also know the RSS and other advocates against Sikhi. But we won't be saying that the Mughals and Aurangzeb with Jahanghir were innocent souls, when they also did wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use