Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jacfsing2    1,834

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If I like a post as one of the 4 other emoji reactions, will the person I give the like towards still get fair reputation bonus or will it be something else? Also another recommendation is to get rid of the "anonymous" likes due to some people who post negativity still getting to be some popular post. (Also good job to whoever made the new system). Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,834
1 hour ago, S1ngh said:

Amar singh did the forum upgrade and other technical stuff to improve the forum and been doing for past 16years. He is doing gupt sewa for all this time.

We are also also thinking of rebuilding the forum and make it as a more social and spiritual place for everyone. 

I am tweaking few areas and resetting the fake likes and will look to disable anon likes. One major bug is that auto bots are reporting posts to mods/admins in big numbers.

One more recommendation is to get rid of the downvote feature, until we can get more active mods, and remove anonymous likes. The reason for that is sometimes, we have crews and cliques that are made specifically to target real Sikhs, from either some Anti-Sikh agendas or trolls. Also until a system that is in place, there is a chance that even the members old or new could have extremely high reputation to extremely low reputation, simply because Anti-Sikh elements are exploiting the system and making troll accounts.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,834
8 minutes ago, simran345 said:

I like the new interface. One thing I've noticed though, is that I can like my own posts. Is that something to consider? 

Just tried that out, yeah it's something that I am with you on this. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422
2 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Just tried that out, yeah it's something that I am with you on this. 

Lol yeah I could get to top of the popular list all by myself if I wanted to 😏.  But I won't, don't worry 🙂. There's going to be competition now, everybody's going to start liking their own posts lol. 

Edited by simran345
Added more
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Confused 5
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,834
13 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If I like a post as one of the 4 other emoji reactions, will the person I give the like towards still get fair reputation bonus or will it be something else? Also another recommendation is to get rid of the "anonymous" likes due to some people who post negativity still getting to be some popular post. (Also good job to whoever made the new system). Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Oh look here, some Anti-Sikh wants to dislike my concerns about how the website is being run about dislikes? How ironic? This person is also anonymous. Could you be any less intelligent in what you are disliking?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JSinghnz    925
On ‎31‎/‎08‎/‎2017 at 6:13 PM, S1ngh said:

Satbachan. Will get rid of the down vote. I also believe that it is autobot thingy for all these gupt likes. Will check on that.

When will the down vote option be removed?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422
22 hours ago, simran345 said:

This is why the downlike emoticon should be got rid of. It's going to be unfair to members and if there's somebody a member doesn't like, then they will dislike all their posts, just because of immaturity. 

Wonder why 6 people are confused by this post. 😴

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422
On 31/08/2017 at 10:29 AM, simran345 said:

Lol yeah I could get to top of the popular list all by myself if I wanted to 😏.  But I won't, don't worry 🙂. There's going to be competition now, everybody's going to start liking their own posts lol. 

Ok clever clogs, I know what's going on with this post. The one person that has given a range of emoticons, pack it in. Hmm wondered why I was doing well in the popular list 🤔.  5 are confused and 1 is sad, give it a rest, stop trying to make out it's me liking my own posts. 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Heretic or a Turk. Both are repulsive. The heretic is an internal threat where as the Turk is external. Whether or not he's insulted the Gurus (as of yet), is not the issue. It's the fact that he's Turk-Beeraj.
    • I do not believe in an absolute morality, dharam is not the same for each and every individual. This is not to say that dharam does not exist, only that it doesn't exist in a monolithic form.  This concept is reflected very well in the life of the Mahapurakh Sant Baba Thakur Singh, 14th jathedar of Damdami Taksaal. Babaji was a strict vegetarian like all members of Taksaal, so for him eating meat was a great sin. However when he visited the chaunis (encampments) of Nihang Singhs around Chowk Mehta he would often bring offerings of goats to be jhatkaa'd by the nihangs and later consumed. Because eating meat was not a great paap for them as it was for babaji, rather it was their tradition and he respected that the role they were given by the Almighty was different from his own.  Satguru's Hukam affects each person differently.  Eastern dharams tend not to impose moral codes on the whole of humankind, as though such codes apply to everybody. Yes there are certain basic guiding principles of human morality - don't murder, don't rape, but most sane people don't really need to be told not to do these things by a religion because they feel an inherent revulsion towards them. However beyond this things can get quite flexible. Some people are meant to be householders and provide for a family, whilst others are meant to be celibates and devote their lives and all their energy to Akaal Purakh and Seva of the Panth. If God creates someone with the intention that they will become a warrior, battle becomes dharam for this person, a righteous deed. If however God creates a man and by his hukam determines that this man is to be peaceful saint, battle is adharam for him, not righteous. This is why different sampardas/jathebandiaan exist in Sikhi. Guru Ji is not/was not anti-samparda or anti-jathebandi, if they were, they wouldn't have created or blessed so many of them themselves. I don't know if what I'm saying is right, but this is the conclusion I have arrived at from my study of Sikhi. Others will have arrived at different conclusions, and good thing too -  Sikhi is a garden full of many diverse flowers.  I do not believe Guru Ji aspired to make all Sikhs, or all people,  identical in their religious outlook and practice. 
    • So you think that Sikhs and Muslims need to remain bitter enemies for as long as this world exists?   And because of 84 do we also need to become eternal enemies of the Hindus forever and ever?   Yesterday Hindus were our friends but they ended up knifing us in the back. And Yesterday's enemies can become strategic allies of today. Try to see the bigger picture.
    • This one statement just proves you should know before commenting on such complex topics.
×