Jump to content
TejS

The Path to a Sikh Renaissance

Recommended Posts

Kira    1,219
47 minutes ago, TejS said:

I'll admit that I haven't understood the Dasam Granth in its entirety, so perhaps I should first read through it, understand it from all perspectives, and I would then be in a better position on offering my opinion of it.

But I agree with you that the Sri Charitopakhyan is not only critiquing women, but also men. It's just the wording, which in other parts, such as the tales, can get quite vulgar, and my initial response of certain parts being deemed inappropriate was based off of that. I will, however, definitely make time to go through the Dasam Granth in its entirety, and not only glaze over the controversial passages.

Bro there are passages in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji that basically allude to a sexual nature, in fact its more so than people think. given the analogy of the wife going to the husband's bed. The passages are only vulgar if you see it that way, the tales within the passage are raw and humans certainly don't flower up their sentences. I mean just look at all the western trash on TV to see that, Guru Sahib simply exposed it as it is, humans being vulgar., the point of the bani is simply to bring everything to life, to show everything as it is with no portions missed out, its a sense of realism within it , the moral lessons within the bani are immense. At the end of it Guru Sahib recited Chaupai Sahib and asks God to protect us from all that evil Kaam. 

If we end we up rejecting Sri Charitropakhyan  then we have to reject Chaupai Sahib too, as its ingrained within the bani and was penned as a part of it. 

 

But we're getting off topic, lets stick to the one here. You're free to make another topic with questions and im sure the Sangat is happy to answer them or if you wish you're free to PM me, i can try and help you the best i can.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sukhvirk1976    189
19 hours ago, TejS said:

However, there are certain issues that our community is currently grappling with, such as Hindu influenced practices, and to rid those we need to apply a far more aggressive, calculated and dogmatic approach - which I personally see nothing wrong with. Remember, religion is dogmatic itself, otherwise you would not have Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims. I think intrinsically humans are attracted towards dogma for a reason, we need them to have an identity and feel defined

Brother what you described is exactly the problem.. You are suggesting that for the sake of the panth we should compromise the principals.. Reading the thread after you comments about dasam Granth is the perfect example of why sikhi can't go down that route.. Where we lose the message.. Sikhi is  Sanji kaum nobody owns it or has the right to define it... None of our Gurus did! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TejS    223
3 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Brother what you described is exactly the problem.. You are suggesting that for the sake of the panth we should compromise the principals.. Reading the thread after you comments about dasam Granth is the perfect example of why sikhi can't go down that route.. Where we lose the message.. Sikhi is  Sanji kaum nobody owns it or has the right to define it... None of our Gurus did! 

 

But our Gurus did ultimately define Sikhi and layed down a dogma for us in the GGS, one that needs to be followed, right? The principals are part of the Sikh dogma, and the dogma preserves the message. Now I could be looking at this from a very narrow-minded perspective, but I'm sorry brother, I'm unable to understand how upholding the dogmas will compromise the principals, when they're interdependent on each other. And yes you're right that Sikhi is sanji, however if you have some people bringing in their own inference to Sikhi, which clearly goes against its principles, such as casteism, and they identify as Sikhs, then I think we as a community must take action and correct those miscreant ways, otherwise those certain inidividuals aren't following the Sikh way of life, which itself is very clearly defined and fleshed out.

Edited by TejS
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,219
15 minutes ago, TejS said:

But our Gurus did ultimately define Sikhi and layed down a dogma for us in the GGS, one that needs to be followed, right? The principals are part of the Sikh dogma, and the dogma preserves the message. Now I could be looking at this from a very narrow-minded perspective, but I'm sorry brother, I'm unable to understand how upholding the dogmas will compromise the principals, when they're interdependent on each other. And yes you're right that Sikhi is sanji, however if you have some people bringing in their own inference to Sikhi, which clearly goes against its principles, such as casteism, and they identify as Sikhs, then I think we as a community must take action and correct those miscreant ways. 

The main issue lies in the uneducated masses who proclaim to know about Sikhi without having gone to the source. Our ancestors and Guru Sahib did define Sikhi and they laid our Rehit for us to follow, Gurbani is for all but what good is doing the Paath if you're going to go out drinking and partying 10 minutes after. 

You're right the defination of a Sikh in terms of Gurbani and Rehit has been defined by Guru Sahib multiple times in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, in Dasam Granth and even in Sarbloh Granth. Granths like Suraj Prakash Granth also define what a sikh was in purtan times, its the ego of this growing trend that recently surfaced where people think all the great Sikh Shaheeds and Mahapurkhs never understood Sikhi till some half wit with next to no knowledge opened up a book written by another wise fool, and suddenly the message is clear. 

The disease of basically radical liberalism has started its curse on Sikhi now too. There are ideologies which conflict greatly with Sikhi, obviously there are overlaps but ultimately these labels always exist. In-fact even during Guru Sahib's time these labels were like a badge of Honour for people. Sikhs of Guru Nanak Dev Ji were happy to proclaim it from the rooftop. The misconception is that Gurbani is for all, anyone can read it and learn from it. But to be a Sikh is much more than that. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,219
8 minutes ago, TejS said:

Exactly what I'm saying. Religion, at the end of the day, is dogma, and it needs to be followed, in order to live the life the religion has entailed. If one doesn't like it, then change your religion, simple. 

I think there are people who don't want to follow religion, and think that reaching God can be done without a set of dogmas, and that is absolutely fine imo, and I am not saying they are worse or better than anyone, or me, but what I'm saying is that if you identify as Sikh, then you will have to follow the dogma. Otherwise, don't identify as Sikh. 

I look at people like the Nanakpanthis who will go against certain Sikh principles and adopt practices they feel are fit for them to reach God. That is a perfectly fine path, but it is never referred to as the path of Sikhi. Similarly, we can educated them on the path of Sikhi, however those who despite having the knowledge do not wish to follow the dogma, can do whatsoever they please, but can't be identified as Sikh. 

Sikhism is not as open or ambigous as the Sanatan Dharma, and the Gurus have not made it as such, so if one needs openness, then Sikhi is not for them.

totally agree. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,219
3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Dogma is anathema in sikhi

Provide evidence from any religious texts (historical Granths or Scriptures) pre-dating 19th Century to back it up.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sukhvirk1976    189
1 hour ago, Kira said:

Provide evidence from any religious texts (historical Granths or Scriptures) pre-dating 19th Century to back it up.

To back what up? 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,219
7 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

To back what up? 

Your statement obviously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,845
8 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Dogma is anathema in sikhi

Define "Dogma".

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
13 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Brother what you described is exactly the problem.. You are suggesting that for the sake of the panth we should compromise the principals.. Reading the thread after you comments about dasam Granth is the perfect example of why sikhi can't go down that route.. Where we lose the message.. Sikhi is  Sanji kaum nobody owns it or has the right to define it... None of our Gurus did! 

 

errr I think you'll find Guru Sahiban defined in detail and illustrated the panth (path) over a period of two HUNDRED years and still can be asked/ consulted forever more in Guru Granth Sahib ji  ... it is complete with all aspects clarified about living in kalyug as a Khalsa in Dasam Granth ji, and how to gain and maintain Khalsa Raj in combination with Sarbloh Granth ji 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sukhvirk1976    189
On 05/09/2017 at 3:35 PM, jkvlondon said:

errr I think you'll find Guru Sahiban defined in detail and illustrated the panth (path) over a period of two HUNDRED years and still can be asked/ consulted forever more in Guru Granth Sahib ji  ... it is complete with all aspects clarified about living in kalyug as a Khalsa in Dasam Granth ji, and how to gain and maintain Khalsa Raj in combination with Sarbloh Granth ji 

I think you will find its non dogmatic in the context of this conversation 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
2 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

I think you will find its non dogmatic in the context of this conversation 

dogma
ˈdɒɡmə/
noun
 
  1. a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
    "the dogmas of faith"
    synonyms: teaching, belief, conviction, tenet, principle, ethic, precept, maxim, article of faith, canon, law, rule;

     

    Whatever Guru ji said , did was is and shall always be true ...so now what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sukhvirk1976    189
19 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:
dogma
ˈdɒɡmə/
noun
 
  1. a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
    "the dogmas of faith"
    synonyms: teaching, belief, conviction, tenet, principle, ethic, precept, maxim, article of faith, canon, law, rule;

     

    Whatever Guru ji said , did was is and shall always be true ...so now what?

Your interpretation is dogmatic not the bani

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its not just him. One of the most ridiculous notions peddled by the left is that ALL of the far right are idiots who can't tell the difference. The reality is something completely different. People like Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopoulos, both of whom have a respectable number of followers remind people of this whenever there is an attack as the media paints us with the same brush as the terrorists.  Most of the big Right wing "preachers" i guess is an accurate term, know the difference and tend to cite it always.
    • Don't worry about not having a spiritual experience. The main thing is you don't divert from God's name. You don't want to get into ego from experiences either.  All people are not the same, an experience to one person may not be the same as another, however large or small it maybe. We should bear in mind, that we do not recite God's name for experiences, but to think of it as our duty and love towards them. If we start to ask for experiences, then we have forgotten what our goal is.  It is up to Waheguru to grace somebody with an experience. It can happen how much more or less time on one spends on Simran, than another. Do not compare yourself to others, an experience will happen in Waheguru's Hukam, not by anybody saying how or when.  Its good to increase Simran, Gurbani if you wish to and spending more time to devote yourself towards it, will never be incomplete of anything. But we must focus on doing Simran and not expect anything back in return. Just leave that to God to decide.  Say if somebody has an experience, does it necessarily mean it has to be a physical one or that is visible? And then what after that?  Doing Simran, reciting/listening to  Gurbani is an experience in itself. We are here in this world for this experience of having the opportunity to, that is also an experience we should be grateful for. But we forget God is everywhere.  ਤੂੰ ਜਲਿ ਥਲਿ ਮਹੀਅਲਿ ਭਰਿਪੁਰਿ ਲੀਣਾ ਤੂੰ ਆਪੇ ਸਰਬ ਸਮਾਣਾ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ 
      तूं जलि थलि महीअलि भरिपुरि लीणा तूं आपे सरब समाणा ॥१॥ रहाउ ॥ 
      Ŧūʼn jal thal mahī▫al bẖaripur līṇā ṯūʼn āpe sarab samāṇā. ||1|| rahā▫o. 
      Thou art fully contained in water, dry land nether and upper regions. Thou Thyself art pervading everywhere. Pause. 
      SGGS ji Ang 731 🙏🏻 Dhan Guru Nanak Dev ji   I understand that you maybe desiring for an experience to feel the presence of God for yourself, but just remind yourself they are everywhere. When we do Simran with love for God, then we'll start to feel the anand (bliss) of it, when God graces us with it.   
    • Apart from the ignorant British attacking a Sikh wearing a turban (which I hear is very rare, I'm Canadian/American btw), I doubt that the British people will target Sikhs. Instead, what they will do is far worse, they will use our history with the Muslims to incite us and basically use us as fodder as they did in their Raj, though this time, it'll be purely against the Muslims. 
    • It is going to be of no use to you to know how much simran to do. You simply have to arrange time for yourself. .. approximately 2 hours 40 minutes everyday. One tenth of your time everyday to Devote to simran. It is a blessing from God if one is able to put in this amount of time.  Pichle janam dhi kamayi counts as well greatly. God has preselected exactly whom he would like to have these experiences.  If you have these experiences, then you have to learn to not spread them about and you will have more. There are many more things that come to pass... we are spiritual beings suffering from separation from our creator. Reconnection is going to occur slowly and understanding these experiences comes slowly too. As you keep your simran up, you are able to obtain great amounts of happiness and peace from it. So forming a habit of simran should be done as a conscious effort. 
    • Guest Balvir kaur
      I wish I could concentrate like you, doing path since I was a child but never have any such experience. if u could write here how much. Am how much bhajan simran u do, what time and how, it could hep us   thanks
×