Jump to content
Nihang96k

Does anyone know the Nihang nitnem?

Recommended Posts

I can tell you what is in the Buddha Dal gutka as from the banis I read yesterday

( I haven't finished full nitnem today, been at work and trying to finish using headphones, also terrible at waking at amritvela):

Japji Sahib

Shabad Hazare

Jaap Sahib

Shabad Hazare patshahi 10

Twa Parsad Swaiye

Twa Parsad Swaiye - Deenan ke pratipal

Akal Ustat Chaupai - Pranvo Aad Ekankara ...

Chaupai Sahib (long version)

Anand Sahib

Chandi Charitar Ustat

Chandi Di Vaar

Uggardanti

Shastar Naam Maala

Evening

Sodar Rehraas (Sampooran) 

Aarti Aarta (long) - Lop Chandika

 

Night

Rakhiya de shabad and Keertan Sohila (I forget the order because I normally don't use the gutka for my sleeping paat and normally listen to a slightly different version by Baba Nihal Singh)

And hopefully someone can explain and expand this and add any or subtract banis according to maryada.

 

Edited by ipledgeblue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"9. Saverey Amrit vele Gurmantar ante Moolmantar da jaap karke, Panj banian da saverey path karey ja suney. Behdeaan uthdean, Vaheguru jaap ja Mool mantar da jaap karde rehna.

(Panj Baanian : Jap Sahib Jaap Sahib, Swaiye (sravag sudh), Chaupai, Anand Sahib (Sampooran). Hor baanian khushi aavey parho.

Shami - Sodar Rehraas --Aarti Aarta parhe ja suney. Saaun samey kirtan sohila da path kar ardas kar bisraam karey.)"

 

7.Upon waking in the morning recite Waheguru mantra and Mool Mantra while uniting surat and shabd through breath control

8. In the morning one must recite gurmantra, mool mantra and then recite or listen to the 5 banis, and Kirtan Sohila should be recited before going to sleep

 

 

I think that could be the nitnem. I am not sure about the maryada that I got this from though. I usually just do the normal 5 baania in the morning, rehras and then kirtan sohila in evening and night time.

The maryada I follow is mostly parts of Bhai Daya Singh's rehatnama which I think most Akaali's follow nowadays although it is uncertain on some parts but I just try my best to follow it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you want to know budha dal nitnem or tarna dal nitnem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

is there a difference?

Nihangs have 'Dal Panth'

And they have jathebandi's inside that panth just like we do. (Budha Dal being the main one)
So Tarna Dal would be considered a jathebandi of Dal Panth and therefore would have different beliefs than every other Dal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

is there a difference?

Yes there are differences, such as length differences and what banis they do etc. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji didn't discriminate between satguru as their is only one same satguru for every yug.  He told us to praise, worship, meditate on the one and only satguru.  He wrote about the 24 incarnations of Vishnu and he corrected what happened actually to the 24 incarnations.  If Krishna and Vishnu were satguru, Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji would have said it in his writing about them.  Instead he wrote to say I don't praise them or think of them, I hold Mahakaal ( which translates into Vaheguru in this context as he is the destroyer of all) praise only in my mind.
    • people need to stop having WWA matches with rehits imo. 
    • This whole jathabandi nonsense has had a negative impact on Sikhi, and I wish we would do away with it.
    •   Jagsaw, I am very surprised that you consider the movement of Sikhs out of areas with substantial Sikh populations to be "progress". First of all, I thought you lived in Southall?  Or perhaps another part of West London?  If so, I find it odd that you consider it a positive thing not to live in areas such as the one that you yourself live in. Second of all, I think you are greatly overlooking just how much of a positive impact that living in an area with a substantial Sikh population can have when it comes to preserving our religion and culture.  It is foolish to discount the importance of children being able to grow up in a "community", with Gurdwaras and Khalsa Schools nearby, with peers who come from the same background, who practice the same things, speak the same language.  I credit the "ghettoization" of the Sikh community in the UK for preserving the Sikh religion and Punjabi culture despite several generations having elapsed.  The vast majority of Sikhs in the UK trace their roots in the UK to the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s.  Yet somehow, young Sikhs in the UK appear to be more religious and interested in Sikh issues than the Sikh youth in Canada or America.  Somehow, young Sikhs in the UK seem to have almost as much exposure to Punjabi language and culture as their American and Canadian counterparts whose families arrived from India in the 1980s and 1990s. In America, the vast majority of Sikhs live in cities and neighborhoods with effectively no Sikh presence.  That has an impact.  It leads to young Sikhs who grow up with little knowledge of, connection to, or regard for their religion and culture.  It leads to interfaith marriages that effectively wipe out Sikhi from families.  It cripples our ability to safeguard our way of life.  I very much doubt that young Sikhs in America in the year 2060, whose families arrived in the 1990s, will speak fluent Punjabi, go to the gurdwara, engage with their religion, and connect to Sikh political issues the way that a surprisingly large number of young Sikhs in the UK do today. 
    •   I think Malwa gets more credit for keeping Sikhi alive than it deserves.  Malwa is bigger than Majha and Doaba combined (in both land and population).  So the contributions its people have made to Sikhi in recent times is a bit distorted (I say "recent times", because before 1947, Majha and Malwa were comparable in terms of land and Sikh population).  Malwa is so much bigger that it dominates.   It is notable that even though Majha has a much smaller population than Malwa, the vast majority of young Sikhs who took up arms in the 1980s were from Majha. The Majha district (especially what is now Amritsar District and Tarn Taran District) have historically been the strongholds of Sikhi.  However, this region was the hardest hit during the dark times of the 1980s and 1990s, and it is perhaps the hardest hit today when it comes to the drug epidemic.  Sadly, the Sikh youth in Majha seem to have discarded their kesh, do not follow rehat, and have in many cases succumbed to drugs.
×