Jump to content
monatosingh

Problems with certain Jathebandi's

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sitokaur said:

AFTER A SIKH TAKES KHANDEY BATEY KI PAHUL, THAT SIKH HAS ONE FATHER, GURU GOBIND SINGH JIO.

SIKH MISSION IS TO USE GURBANI ATEY SASTAR TO KILL 5 BHOOT WITHIN US, NOT OTHERS.

KEEP LOW PROFILE AS WE WALK KANIO TIKHI PATH, BECAUSE NON SIKHS AND NOT YET AMRITDHARI OR THOSE WHO HAVE NOT RECEIVED VAHIGUROO NADAR/ DARSHAN, THINK DIFFERENT (they believe their values, possessions etc is ultimate truth ji).

WE ONLY DEFEND OUR LIFE AS LAST OPTION, BUT STILL TRY NOT TO KILL JIO_/\_.  Consequence of killing, is prison term with worst than me persons, prison torture, jamdhoot in afterlife (?), etc.

I never lived as a k..., so please mind your language, for sake of Guru Gobind Singh Jio, our NOBLE FATHER, WHOSE HONOR IS UPON US TO ACT, SPEAK, AND THINK WITH HUMILITY, AND LOVE_/\_

Akaaluhhhhhh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ps. with regards to KHALSA Bhai Hawara Singh Jio, et al, it is self defense as I witnessed unarmed Gursikh shot by punjab police, then his mother, wife, children threatened and home terrorised.  So here Khalsa Soorma Bhai Hawara Jio defending Guru Gobind Singh KHALSA_/\_, from evil of kalyug, as we are family of Khalsa, thus, our duty to protect Khalsa family.

Edited by sitokaur
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Western countries, and even Asian countries, have assistance for all issues, and this is what is very lacking in Punjab.  Gursikh who was shot requested principal to not allow his children to have access to answers to tests that year. Principal accused him of being terrorist to police.  Police just shoots, instead of taking to prison, allow attorney representation, and CONCRETE evidence of terrorism threat.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, sitokaur said:

 

I never lived as a k..., so please mind your language, for sake of Guru Gobind Singh Jio, our NOBLE FATHER, WHOSE HONOR IS UPON US TO ACT, SPEAK, AND THINK WITH HUMILITY, AND LOVE_/\_

Please forgive me for that comment. I do not know why I said that. I was out of order, and yes you are correct, I need to watch my mouth. Please do not take my comments to heart, Apologies sister. 

 

Dectruction 

Edited by Destruction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Destruction said:

Admin, we know this is a lie. This forum is a khalistani akj loving, semi taksal loving and nihang hating platform. Say it how it is without frabicating it. There is censorship on this forum. 

Pretty smart of you to conclude with just 100 something post of yours. Been here since 2001 and still hard to tell where this forum leans toward. Had there been censorship just like you imagined then I'm sure you would have been gone way before hitting the 100th post 😎

Spread piyaar rather than misguided amateur hate. Teek keha?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Mahakaal96 said:

if agreeing with & accepting the katha of Sant Jarnail Singh makes me a nindak then so be it

 

you on the other hand are a haramda.... definition of haramda is someone who doesn't know who their real father (Guru) is. 

You reject hukam of Mata Sundri Ji, granth of Rattan Singh Bhangu, work of Giani Gian Singh, katha of Sant Jarnail Singh in favour of someone who changed Gurus fateh & declared himself the 12th Guru according to the above named sources.... but like a haramda who doesn't know who his real father is you indulge in personality worship of that person

Sant Jarnail Singh ji Khalsa said women take Amrit with khanda as men do.  And you say women are not to get Amrit and if they do its through Kirpan.  Since you go against Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji Amrit for women with khanda.  This makes you the haramda.  Mr.nang is your name and fame.  Paint it on your forehead and wear it proud, nang.  You will always be a nang.  Nang calls McLeod translations highest authority for khalsa Panth rehat.  You are not even a one hit wonder.  How come you are McLeod pet bunny?  Does he have your carrot?  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mahakaal96 said:

If following maryada of Hazur Sahib & Budda Dal makes one a haramda then I'm in some pretty good company considering the number of maha gursikhs that followed the same.

Sant Jarnail Singh was not the only person who held those beliefs about Banda Bahadur..

I'm not a mental weakling like you, just because I agree with someone on one subject that doesn't mean I take everything they say as gospel.... this is typical of low intellect phudus like you.... falling into personality worship.... but your different.... your not a haramda.... we all know & you know your father... the gay Muslim donkey that was raped by your mother.

The word you are looking for is "cult of personality" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say it again. Nihangs the likes of joginder who put a dastaar on balbirs head to signify he considers him the head of the dal..they are all pathetic...What can these nihangs do other than drink ragra and claim to be warriors? They are just drug addicts using gurus image to be fed.  They are only clowns wearing weapons. Shame on these nihangs they are useless. They might as well be cross dressers. Cross dressing nangs. I actually respect the shaheeds of 84 such as toofan Singh avatar Singh bhrma way more than majority of these nangs of today. budha dal uk...who is your jathedhar now? Joginder is huddled in bed with balbir thy have joint forces,. You guys used to cuss balbir and rate joginder. Your beloeved opium addict jathedhar is now sleeping with the enemy. Who is your jathedhar now? I would call you gays but I'd be offending gays by comparing them to the likes of you punk bitches who quite enjoy taking it up the exit hole.

Edited by Destruction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Junky baba with balbir.

junky baba receiving siropa From balbir

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good reviews on Amazon
    • La Noche Triste   Pav Singh’s 1984: India’s Guilty Secret and the continuing Sikh night of sorrows. Is catastrophe a precursor to genocide or is genocide a spontaneous outburst of violence- essentially a riot? The misnomer of riot to veil genocide is nowhere more evident than in the Indian state’s treatment of the anti-Sikh pogroms of November 1984. Whereas the political-cum-social discourse of the majority community has condensed the event into the misbranded Delhi Riots, for the survivors they were a well-executed genocide. It is axiomatic that justice delayed is justice denied; Pav Singh in his 1984: India’s Guilty Secrethowever goes a step further- on the basis of the survivors’ accounts which he recounts lucidly- Singh contends that November was by no means a riot. It was the culmination of a long drawn out plan to inflict such wounds on the Sikh psyche that the community would never again agitate for civil rights in the Indian union, and assimilate into the greater neo-Hindu political fold (Hindutva). Radical, in scope, 1984 has swiftly dethroned existing analyses of that apocalyptic November and portends change in the global perception of genocide.   1984, from the onset, does not exercise restraint. It is vivid in it’s recounting of the horrors which the Sikhs faced in the aftermath of Prime Minister Indra Gandhi’s assassination. Whereas the mass rapes of Sikh girls and women have often been downplayed in the works of Khushwant Singh and Nayer, Pav Singh elects to focus on how it was employed as a tool to humiliate Sikh males before they were doused in kerosene and set on fire. His almost calm narration of events is enough to render even the most staunch of readers chilled. A fourteen year old boy is forced to witness the gang-rape of his mother; a whole family is hurled out of their residence to witness their daughters being stripped nude, urinated upon and then raped by hordes of mourners (as consecutive political accounts would refer to the culprits). Sikh males are set alight whereas groups of Sikh women are rounded up and held outside Delhi in a semi-concentration camp where they are continually violated. The myth that only Sikh males were targeted is effortlessly effaced by Pav Singh who dedicates an entire chapter to the sexual atrocities suffered by Sikh women. The attitude of doctors, police, and general society towards the victims of rape are also scrutinized. Elements of all three would be instrumental in evicting victims from aid camps and returning them to their prior locii which, in most cases, would be in ruins. The fortunate would escape; the unfortunate would once again fall into the hands of their violators.  Another complex facet, of the November pogroms, which has hitherto been obscured is what happened to the Sikh policemen and military personnel in Delhi? 1984 unabashedly substantiates, based on official documentation, how all Sikh serving personnel in Delhi were ordered to take leave in the early hours of November 1st ’84. Most would have had no idea, other than that Indra Gandhi had been gunned down by her Sikh bodyguard duo the night before, of the inferno which awaited them outside their official precincts. Weaponless, they would have walked straight into effective death traps. Military personnel, serving or otherwise, would have fallen prey to armed mobs on the nation’s railway network. Were Sikhs only targeted at train stops? Pav Singh systematically exposes this canard, again relying on official documentation, to evidence that at least forty-six unauthorized train stops were made which allowed assembled mobs to slay all Sikhs on board.   For Sikhs, the primacy of Pav Singh’s work hinges on three crucial factors: 1.) It effectively refutes the misnomer of riot. 2.) Whilst paying tribute to the few brave souls who risked life and limb to save Sikhs, it also depicts the callousness of politicians, police and neighbors who betrayed the Sikhs by rendering them defenseless in the face of bloodthirsty mobs. 3.) It refutes the theory of Delhi Riots. Detailed maps provide evidence of sanguinary pogroms executed in Gujrat, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Assam, West Bengal and Agartala.  Candid, impenitent and critical- Pav Singh’s 1984 is radical in it’s approach to the November pogroms. Though sections of the Indian media are criticizing Singh, his work should be judged with impartiality; India’s Guilty Secret not only recounts the atrocities inflicted on the Sikhs, but also exposes the political/social cohesion via which the events of November ’84 transpired. The theory of Nanak Jayanti, an alleged rumor which posits that the pogroms were intended for execution on the birth celebrations of Guru Nanak Dev Ji (founder of the Sikh faith) for maximum damage, is also analyzed by Singh. Victim statements are taken into account which depict the conditions outside Punjab in the aftermath of the ill-construed Operation Bluestar. Sikh businesses and residences were often transcribed with a S symbol in the lead-up to November; on the night of 31st October teams were employed to scour several cities in a mission to place this S on all Sikh locations. On the 1st of November the grim significance of this symbol would become transparent as mobs  marched on all such identified locations.  Nanak Jayanti, caught out by Gandhi’s demise, had been implemented earlier to teach the troublesome Sikhs a bloody lesson.    What of the judiciary and the aftermath? Singh, in a brief list, provides an exposition of all the failed commissions which attempted to tackle November ’84 but failed to provide even token justice for the victims. He ends on a poignant note; the survivors of ’84, forgotten by all, are shown as suffering from the trauma of the atrocities inflicted upon them. The state is continually failing in it’s mandate to provide them justice; the social discourse veils their trauma whereas the same ideology which preyed upon them is today gaining ground nationwide. Justice delayed is justice denied, justice denied is justice perverted.    https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/la-noche-triste/  
    • La Noche Triste   Pav Singh’s 1984: India’s Guilty Secret and the continuing Sikh night of sorrows. Is catastrophe a precursor to genocide or is genocide a spontaneous outburst of violence- essentially a riot? The misnomer of riot to veil genocide is nowhere more evident than in the Indian state’s treatment of the anti-Sikh pogroms of November 1984. Whereas the political-cum-social discourse of the majority community has condensed the event into the misbranded Delhi Riots, for the survivors they were a well-executed genocide. It is axiomatic that justice delayed is justice denied; Pav Singh in his 1984: India’s Guilty Secrethowever goes a step further- on the basis of the survivors’ accounts which he recounts lucidly- Singh contends that November was by no means a riot. It was the culmination of a long drawn out plan to inflict such wounds on the Sikh psyche that the community would never again agitate for civil rights in the Indian union, and assimilate into the greater neo-Hindu political fold (Hindutva). Radical, in scope, 1984 has swiftly dethroned existing analyses of that apocalyptic November and portends change in the global perception of genocide.   1984, from the onset, does not exercise restraint. It is vivid in it’s recounting of the horrors which the Sikhs faced in the aftermath of Prime Minister Indra Gandhi’s assassination. Whereas the mass rapes of Sikh girls and women have often been downplayed in the works of Khushwant Singh and Nayer, Pav Singh elects to focus on how it was employed as a tool to humiliate Sikh males before they were doused in kerosene and set on fire. His almost calm narration of events is enough to render even the most staunch of readers chilled. A fourteen year old boy is forced to witness the gang-rape of his mother; a whole family is hurled out of their residence to witness their daughters being stripped nude, urinated upon and then raped by hordes of mourners (as consecutive political accounts would refer to the culprits). Sikh males are set alight whereas groups of Sikh women are rounded up and held outside Delhi in a semi-concentration camp where they are continually violated. The myth that only Sikh males were targeted is effortlessly effaced by Pav Singh who dedicates an entire chapter to the sexual atrocities suffered by Sikh women. The attitude of doctors, police, and general society towards the victims of rape are also scrutinized. Elements of all three would be instrumental in evicting victims from aid camps and returning them to their prior locii which, in most cases, would be in ruins. The fortunate would escape; the unfortunate would once again fall into the hands of their violators.  Another complex facet, of the November pogroms, which has hitherto been obscured is what happened to the Sikh policemen and military personnel in Delhi? 1984 unabashedly substantiates, based on official documentation, how all Sikh serving personnel in Delhi were ordered to take leave in the early hours of November 1st ’84. Most would have had no idea, other than that Indra Gandhi had been gunned down by her Sikh bodyguard duo the night before, of the inferno which awaited them outside their official precincts. Weaponless, they would have walked straight into effective death traps. Military personnel, serving or otherwise, would have fallen prey to armed mobs on the nation’s railway network. Were Sikhs only targeted at train stops? Pav Singh systematically exposes this canard, again relying on official documentation, to evidence that at least forty-six unauthorized train stops were made which allowed assembled mobs to slay all Sikhs on board.   For Sikhs, the primacy of Pav Singh’s work hinges on three crucial factors: 1.) It effectively refutes the misnomer of riot. 2.) Whilst paying tribute to the few brave souls who risked life and limb to save Sikhs, it also depicts the callousness of politicians, police and neighbors who betrayed the Sikhs by rendering them defenseless in the face of bloodthirsty mobs. 3.) It refutes the theory of Delhi Riots. Detailed maps provide evidence of sanguinary pogroms executed in Gujrat, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Assam, West Bengal and Agartala.  Candid, impenitent and critical- Pav Singh’s 1984 is radical in it’s approach to the November pogroms. Though sections of the Indian media are criticizing Singh, his work should be judged with impartiality; India’s Guilty Secret not only recounts the atrocities inflicted on the Sikhs, but also exposes the political/social cohesion via which the events of November ’84 transpired. The theory of Nanak Jayanti, an alleged rumor which posits that the pogroms were intended for execution on the birth celebrations of Guru Nanak Dev Ji (founder of the Sikh faith) for maximum damage, is also analyzed by Singh. Victim statements are taken into account which depict the conditions outside Punjab in the aftermath of the ill-construed Operation Bluestar. Sikh businesses and residences were often transcribed with a S symbol in the lead-up to November; on the night of 31st October teams were employed to scour several cities in a mission to place this S on all Sikh locations. On the 1st of November the grim significance of this symbol would become transparent as mobs  marched on all such identified locations.  Nanak Jayanti, caught out by Gandhi’s demise, had been implemented earlier to teach the troublesome Sikhs a bloody lesson.    What of the judiciary and the aftermath? Singh, in a brief list, provides an exposition of all the failed commissions which attempted to tackle November ’84 but failed to provide even token justice for the victims. He ends on a poignant note; the survivors of ’84, forgotten by all, are shown as suffering from the trauma of the atrocities inflicted upon them. The state is continually failing in it’s mandate to provide them justice; the social discourse veils their trauma whereas the same ideology which preyed upon them is today gaining ground nationwide. Justice delayed is justice denied, justice denied is justice perverted.    https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/la-noche-triste/  
    • It seems some Indians see through Ms. Trudeau's act:  Maybe it's just salty right-wing Indians?  
    • Bhai Mokham Singh was the exception. Some Hindus are more kanjoos than others. Gujeratis are those type of Hindus. I heard a Hindu Punjabi Brahmin of all people tell a Gujerati how tight his people were. It was quite an.eye opening experience.  I think we as Sikhs don't look how non Sikhs see us.  I think that these Gujerati Hindus see us intellictually inferior,  big and dumb but cannot figure how come these Sikhs make such a great success of themselves if they are so dumb. They think to themselves , " What is it about the Sardar's religion that makes them this way." They see something in us that we don't and it scares them. We are hated by higher caste hindus because in the caste system they are the rentier castes.  They feed off the lower castes like a parasite does.  We as Sikhs by an large produce and create our own value and distribute it and create more prosperity all round.we operate outside the caste system, it does nothing for us, there is no need for it. We Sikhs have chardikala spirit and therefore we have more energy to take risks.  We don't over -think things like a lot of these highly intellectual Hindus who create paralysis by analysis, we just do. And when we create wealth out of it, it gets right up their nose. 
×