54 posts in this topic

Removed 

Edited by simran345
Removed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, simran345 said:

Is this spam, because I doesn't show me anything, but a page to click on a link if I'm over 18? 

it's not spam... It's a Nihang Sikh beheaded another Sikh in a Gurudwara... . wtff

 

edit: graphic video removed. 

 

if you want to see it search on youtube "sikh man decapitation" but warning, really graphic. 

 

Edited by MAJHAIL_JATT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Removed.

Edited by simran345

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, simran345 said:

@MAJHAIL_JATT, ok thanks paji. For some reason I'm getting weird page. 

Paji, please take it off. Children come on this forum and they are going to be deeply disturbed by it. That's probably the reason for the 18yrs age warning in the link. 

Omg, where was this? 

This was the murder of Nihang Bhai Pyara Singh 45  in charge at a gurdwara in Fatehgarh Sahib ilaka , he was stabbed and then decapitated as he left darbar i.e. ambushed by another sewadar Singh (think he was Nihang too)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jkvlondon said:

This was the murder of Nihang Bhai Pyara Singh 45  in charge at a gurdwara in Fatehgarh Sahib ilaka , he was stabbed and then decapitated as he left darbar i.e. ambushed by another sewadar Singh (think he was Nihang too)

what was the reason behind it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Kira said:

what was the reason behind it.

usual irka , wanting control of gurdwara

 

Edited by jkvlondon
adding urls

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Removed. 

Edited by simran345
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't there a less gruesome way to discuss this, there are guests who read these forums on topics, many are kids and some guests are not going to be interested in hearing this stuff, let alone a recorded video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Isn't there a less gruesome way to discuss this, there are guests who read these forums on topics, many are kids and some guests are not going to be interested in hearing this stuff, let alone a recorded video.

That's why I said it should be taken off. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, simran345 said:

Is this spam, because it doesn't show me anything, but a page to click on a link if I'm over 18? 

simran remove your quote of the vid and I'll ask majhail again to remove his OP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remove your vid please 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

simran remove your quote of the vid and I'll ask majhail again to remove his OP

Ok sis, sorry I've just seen this now. All posts removed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dallysingh101 said:

I don't think we should remove the vid myself. But....

ppl can always look it up, it is not necessary for us to discuss the disturbing trend of people in bana running around to assassinate proper Gursikhs and defame Budha dal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

I don't think we should remove the vid myself. But....

Paji, it's wise to remove it. It made me want to throw up. If I found it hard to view, (I'm normally not that squeamish), then I wouldn't want any child or person to go through the trauma of it. We have to protect the children, youngsters too on here. 

Edited by simran345
Added extra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Paji, it's wise to remove it. It made me want to throw up. If I found it hard to view, (I'm normally not that squeamish), then I wouldn't want any child or person to go through the trauma of it. We have to protect the children, youngsters too on here. 

I hear you sister, I just disagree. We need to toughen them up in my opinion. I'm just saying (just for a historical discussion) teenagers saw this and much worse throughout our people's history. Maharaja Ranjit Singh did just this as a teenager.  

But I won't argue with you too much. Take it off if you insist. 

Edited by dallysingh101
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dallysingh101 said:

I hear you sister, I just disagree. We need to toughen them up in my opinion. I'm just saying (just for a historical discussion) teenagers saw this and much worse throughout our people's history. Maharaja Ranjit Singh did just this as a teenager.  

But I won't argue with you too much. Take if off if you insist. 

Discussing it is different from actually viewing it. All sorts of thoughts will affect their mind. I understand what you mean, but even in movies, there's tolerance limits, that's why they set ratings and age recommendations.  I saw one that wouldn't let you view it without logging in and confirming your age. Like penji jkv says, it can be searched for. 

We wouldn't take our children to watch a movie with that, so same should apply here. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Discussing it is different from actually viewing it. All sorts of thoughts will affect their mind. I understand what you mean, but even in movies, there's tolerance limits, that's why they set ratings and age recommendations.  I saw one that wouldn't let you view it without logging in and confirming your age. Like penji jkv says, it can be searched for. 

We wouldn't take our children to watch a movie with that, so same should apply here. 

Take it off. I ain't got a problem.  Just know that young Sikh males were exposed to this kind of stuff from quite a young age (i.e. it wasn't 18+ like a movie rating today). 

Just remember the ages of the older sahibzadas when they went into battle and got shaheed. I bet the panj piaray was young too (not the old mfs that try and represent them in nagar kirtans these days). 

 

Just saying. Maybe bibian need to curb their western maternal instincts just a touch maybe?

Edited by dallysingh101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dallysingh101 said:

Take it off. I ain't got a problem.  Just know that young Sikh males were exposed to this kind of stuff from quite a young age (i.e. it wasn't 18+ like a movie rating today). 

Just remember the ages of the older sahibzadas when they went into battle and got shaheed. I bet the panj piaray was young too (not the old mfs that try and represent them in nagar kirtans these days). 

 

Just saying. Maybe bibian need to curb their western maternal instincts just a touch maybe?

it's not just the younger audience but the trolls who will twist this to make it out that we are somehow deriving pleasure ...I know ppl are really messed up out there , I'd rather not lose another forum just because of others stirring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Take it off. I ain't got a problem.  Just know that young Sikh males were exposed to this kind of stuff from quite a young age (i.e. it wasn't 18+ like a movie rating today). 

Just remember the ages of the older sahibzadas when they went into battle and got shaheed. I bet the panj piaray was young too (not the old mfs that try and represent them in nagar kirtans these days). 

 

Just saying. Maybe bibian need to curb their western maternal instincts just a touch maybe?

There are also some f*cked-up people on this forum, we had one user who actually considered the cause of Bhai Jugraj Singh's cancer because he stood-up to Sharia fanatics. It's not just young people, but some people will say similar stuff about this guy. Have you even read some of the messed-up things people write on these forums? I'm not even talking about kids, but some grown-up adults.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys it wasn't just the act itself but how he did it. the original video actually shows the murder. he walks around and parades the head like ISIS.... IN A GURUDWARA?!?!?!?!.... wt#? Sikh's not like this... not in my native reality. 

Edited by MAJHAIL_JATT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MAJHAIL_JATT said:

guys it wasn't just the act itself but how he did it. the original video actually shows the murder. he walks around and parades the head like ISIS.... IN A GURUDWARA?!?!?!?!.... wt#? Sikh's not like this... not in my native reality. 

He's a jut pendu in my mind. Going 'bwaaahhh!' Chuck doon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I already said that, read the thread!
    • You can't really convert you more adopt the principles 
    •   Perfect Guidance from the Bani, on what we should devote,and how should we devote Him, in the form of Artee.   ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਆਰਤੀ ਮਜਨੁ ਮੁਰਾਰੇ ॥ Naam Thaero Aarathee Majan Muraara Your Name, Lord, is my adoration and cleansing bath   ਹਰਿ ਕੇ ਨਾਮ ਬਿਨੁ ਝੂਠੇ ਸਗਲ ਪਾਸਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Har Kae Naam Bin Jhoothae Sagal Paasaarae ||1|| Rehaao || Without the Name of the Lord, all ostentatious displays are useless   ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਆਸਨੋ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਉਰਸਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰਾ ਕੇਸਰੋ ਲੇ ਛਿਟਕਾਰੇ ॥ Naam Thaero Aasano Naam Thaero Ourasaa Naam Thaeraa Kaesaro Lae Shhittakaarae || Your Name is my prayer mat, and Your Name is the stone to grind the sandalwood. Your Name is the saffron which I take and sprinkle in offering to You.   ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰਾ ਅੰਭੁਲਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਚੰਦਨੋ ਘਸਿ ਜਪੇ ਨਾਮੁ ਲੇ ਤੁਝਹਿ ਕਉ ਚਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ Naam Thaeraa Anbhulaa Naam Thaero Chandhano Ghas Japae Naam Lae Thujhehi Ko Chaarae ||1|| Your Name is the water, and Your Name is the sandalwood. The chanting of Your Name is the grinding of the sandalwood. I take it and offer all this to You. ||1||   ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰਾ ਦੀਵਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਬਾਤੀ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਤੇਲੁ ਲੇ ਮਾਹਿ ਪਸਾਰੇ ॥ Naam Thaeraa Dheevaa Naam Thaero Baathee Naam Thaero Thael Lae Maahi Pasaarae || Your Name is the lamp, and Your Name is the wick. Your Name is the oil I pour into it.   ਨਾਮ ਤੇਰੇ ਕੀ ਜੋਤਿ ਲਗਾਈ ਭਇਓ ਉਜਿਆਰੋ ਭਵਨ ਸਗਲਾਰੇ ॥੨॥ Naam Thaerae Kee Joth Lagaaee Bhaeiou Oujiaaro Bhavan Sagalaarae ||2|| Your Name is the light applied to this lamp, which enlightens and illuminates the entire world. ||2||   ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਤਾਗਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਫੂਲ ਮਾਲਾ ਭਾਰ ਅਠਾਰਹ ਸਗਲ ਜੂਠਾਰੇ ॥ Naam Thaero Thaagaa Naam Fool Maalaa Bhaar Athaareh Sagal Joothaarae || Your Name is the thread, and Your Name is the garland of flowers. The eighteen loads of vegetation are all too impure to offer to You.   ਤੇਰੋ ਕੀਆ ਤੁਝਹਿ ਕਿਆ ਅਰਪਉ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰਾ ਤੁਹੀ ਚਵਰ ਢੋਲਾਰੇ ॥੩॥ Thaero Keeaa Thujhehi Kiaa Arapo Naam Thaeraa Thuhee Chavar Dtolaarae ||3|| Why should I offer to You, that which You Yourself created? Your Name is the fan, which I wave over You. ||3||   ਦਸ ਅਠਾ ਅਠਸਠੇ ਚਾਰੇ ਖਾਣੀ ਇਹੈ ਵਰਤਣਿ ਹੈ ਸਗਲ ਸੰਸਾਰੇ ॥ Dhas Athaa Athasathae Chaarae Khaanee Eihai Varathan Hai Sagal Sansaarae || The whole world is engrossed in the eighteen Puraanas, the sixty-eight sacred shrines of pilgrimage, and the four sources of creation.   ਕਹੈ ਰਵਿਦਾਸੁ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੇਰੋ ਆਰਤੀ ਸਤਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਹੈ ਹਰਿ ਭੋਗ ਤੁਹਾਰੇ ॥੪॥੩॥ Kehai Ravidhaas Naam Thaero Aarathee Sath Naam Hai Har Bhog Thuhaarae ||4||3|| Says Ravi Daas, Your Name is my Aartee, my lamp-lit worship-service. The True Name, Sat Naam, is the food which I offer to You.   Just amazing...just beautiful... Sat Bani Sat Sree Akal.  
    • Blase means to be indifferent or unconcerned. However, you perceive my writing on Dasam Bani being reintroduced to be both nonchalant (why don't we bring in another French word) but also emotional and angry at the same time. That kind of makes for an oxymoron; contradictory terms.  When attempting to have any genuine and fruitful discussion I have experienced it is helpful to not speculate or make conjecture about the viewpoints of another. If curious or in doubt, just ask; ask with the innocent interest of a child. Other genuine level-headed people will gladly oblige. Fools like myself may otherwise find injury in your guesswork.   Bringing in Samparda Kathavachaks fixes the symptom not the illness. The root problem that will fester and multiply is unaddressed. Is this a strategy for the long term that will bring unity and togetherness in the Panth? No. I have posted an excerpt of my last post on this topic below for your convenience, often my arguments become TL;DR.     Again, conjecture and scorn for a person you genuinely want to have dialogue with may not be useful. Some may misinterpret your heartfelt intentions.   If I'm not mistaken, it was rescinded after just two years!  Here is the difference: When the Sikhs took the jagir from the Mughals, they took it after deliberation, discussion, and the approval of the Sarbat Khalsa Baba Harnam Singh Dhumma has built no such discussion and consensus building into his strategy, not even with the Sant Samaj. Heaps of them condemn his political choices.  Getting the discourse changed to Gurmat is good. But the underlying problems remain unaddressed; problems that do the most to hold the Panth back as outlined in my above post.  The jagir allowed the Sikhs to consolidate different jathas under the leadership of Kapur Singh into the Dal Khalsa. Factions were brought together.  They used the political calm to develop their autonomous power and establish their sovereignty This was political power and control that they were able to grow for the Panth. The jagir was taken away very quickly, but look at what they accomplished in that time. The Khalsa was brought together in unity to fight for our future prosperity.  I highly doubt the SIkhs who had been hunted down by Zakariya Khan suddenly became enthralled by his friendship. They took the jagir in a collective, panthic decision and likely knew they could be double-crossed. But they mustered their forces and were in a stronger position for when it did happen.  In all the major issues of the Panth that I have outlined in my previous posts, Baba Harnam Singh Dhumma has made little headway in ameliorating them.  No political autonomy is established for the Panth. The Indian government regulated the SGPC, the SGPC in turn is run by Badal and the Shiromani Akali Dal (Badal). There is no autonomy or control of the Panth in its own affairs, we are led by the string where the political elite wish to go.  As I stated previously: Baba Harnam Singh Dhumma's strategy gives the Panth no autonomy, no control, and he has not pushed forward the Panth's interests in any worthwhile long-lasting way.