Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OneBeing said:

Why are we all arguing amongst ourselves? 

No argument on my part But because One gentleman believes that somehow if a parchaarik says the truth i.e. gurmat and someone finds it objectionable  that somehow the parchaarik has sinned and needs punishment - he pointed out Bhai Jagraj Singh as an example because he developed inoperable cancer. Now that is simply not true and is frankly cowardly and insulting- it's like saying no sikh should speak up for themselves in front of dawah guys or christian missionaries

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, singhbj singh said:

Being a Parcharak doesn't mean you can say & do anything on a public platform there are do's & don'ts

Nobody's asking little mister Internet warrior to do the least bit of help for the world, but for those who are don't be so Beta that you are going to make the Panth look weak as a whole.

1 hour ago, singhbj singh said:

If you knew what karma triggered your health problem wouldn't you advice dear one's not to commit the same deeds ?

Don't know if you've been seriously emotionally abused as a child, but this is not any real argument to stop any Seva.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
19 hours ago, singhbj singh said:

Ask a doc to give you an estimate of how long back could have the cancer cells developed in Bhai Jugraj Singh's body.

From my own perspective @OneBeing, this is why we are arguing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

From my own perspective @OneBeing, this is why we are arguing.

I dont understand what that singhbj person meant. Can you explain?

Edited by OneBeing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, OneBeing said:

I dont understand what that singhbj person meant. Can you explain?

He's basically saying, that because Bhai Jagraj Singh was doing street parchar and having conversations with Muslims about Sikhi, that was the cause or contribution towards him becoming ill. Very narrow minded and pathetic thinking. 

Now you know what to expect if you do parchar, this is the bakwas you will have to hear from people who have no consideration for those that have made a difference to the Panth and helped not only youth, but adults also to connect to Sikhi. Who needs enemies when your own are belittling good soul's names. 

You should be ashamed singhbj. I'm done with u. 

Edited by simran345
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, simran345 said:

He's basically saying, that because Bhai Jagraj Singh was doing street parchar and having conversations with Muslims about Sikhi, that was the cause or contribution towards him becoming ill. Very narrow minded and pathetic thinking. 

Now you know what to expect if you do parchar, this is the bakwas you will have to hear from people who have no consideration for those that have made a difference to the Panth and helped not only youth, but adults also to connect to Sikhi. Who needs enemies when your own are belittling good soul's names. 

You should be ashamed singhbj. I'm done with u. 

Damn! thats messed up.Why would he say this?!?

Oh well, I guess he doesnt know much about life then...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what our brother Bhai Jagraj Singh was in the video link, full of love and nimrata, that people from faiths/religions gave him respect. He didn't hurt people's sentiments as some people try to make out, but as meaningful conversations and did not belittle anybody's faith/religion in the process of giving awareness of Sikhi. 

There's some members on this forum, that think they are know it alls and start judging people's past or that they are lower than others, when in fact it's them that have issues and can't appreciate a person for what they are. That's because they don't bother to look at their own avgun. 

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1603903546311136&id=100000745199122&ref=content_filter

Edited by simran345
Added is.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, jaspindjy said:

.

 

why are you posting nothing in reply to my post?

Are you the same troll as "OneBeing" SinghOne" and now "jaspindjy" ?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

singhbj,

cancer is Vahiguroo given, and death too, but for a Gurmukh as Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, he was no longer living since he replied to musalman at one street parchar,"to be singing Vahiguroo praise amongst holy is ultimate happiness!  Why would there be need for any women etc kurr!"

So cancer and death did not kill Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, because he knew how to live_/\_

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sitokaur said:

Why would there be need for any women etc kurr!"

Penji, I've noticed you occasionally write "kurr" in or at the end of sentences. What does this mean? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
2 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Penji, I've noticed you occasionally write "kurr" in or at the end of sentences. What does this mean? 

In Gurmukhi there's only 2 Akhars: ਕੌਰ, and only one Muharni for Kaur. Something I don't get about converting Punjabi into Roman, is why they pick the letters they do to transliterate. Especially with no, "ਅ"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

In Gurmukhi there's only 2 Akhars: ਕੌਰ, and only one Muharni for Kaur. Something I don't get about converting Punjabi into Roman, is why they pick the letters they do to transliterate. Especially with no, "ਅ"

Is penji writing "Kaur"? I'm not understanding what "kurr" is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, sitokaur said:

Vahiguroo bhul chuk muaf, i am referring "kurr" as in Asa Di // jio_/\_.

Sorry, still don't understand it. Can you write the full pangti please? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sitokaur said:

singhbj,

cancer is Vahiguroo given, and death too, but for a Gurmukh as Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, he was no longer living since he replied to musalman at one street parchar,"to be singing Vahiguroo praise amongst holy is ultimate happiness!  Why would there be need for any women etc kurr!"

So cancer and death did not kill Bhai Jagraj Singh Jio, because he knew how to live_/\_

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

Kaur ji, did he really say 'why would there be need for any woman'?? Do you have the link to the video so I can watch it please? vaheguru ji ka khalsa vaheguru ji ki fateh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bhai Jaita's 'Gur Katha,' Sainapati's 'Gur Sobha,' the works of Bhai Band Lal, 'Gurbilas' all refute Caste and its Vedic roots. Prior to Baba Gurbachan Singh Ji, Gyani Bhagwan Singh, Akali Giana Singh, Phula Singh, Baba Sahib Singh Bedi all administered Amrit to mazhbis from same bata. Tragic to see you implying that the tenth master was a Casteist when himself burnt Bhai Alam Shah's Janeu. The Nihangs of today, with a few exceptions, are all nangs. This saakhi is prior to 1700s. Chibber calls himself a child when this transpired. He chronologically contradicts himself on these points.
    • What is the Punjabi equivalent word for Shaheed(martyr) ? I think word shaheed is used for someone who sacrifices his life in the way of Allah.
    • Interesting to say the least, cause this sakhi is pretty similar to sikhs of that time. In reality up until sant gurbachan singh ji’s time mazhabhis werent allowed to take amrit in the same bata amd this is still happenening in nihang dals as well.  So what do we make of the 1699 amrit samchar? If this sakhi happened in the 1700s etc then that means that what happened in 1699 was different and we interpreted it differently.
    • What about Gurbani? I never said we should change Gurbani, because we can’t. But we can remove Perso-Arabic influences from our vernacular.  And when did I say that we should all begin to speak Hindi and Sanskrit, no that’s a terrible idea. We need to revise Punjabi, and you can call me whatever you like, but I firmly stand by that. Have you forgotten that the very tyrants that killed our Gurus, the Sahibzaades, slaughtered our men, our women, and children, sold our ancestors as slaves, pillaged our land for centuries imposed Perso-Arabic influences onto our language. If we have any ounce of self respect, we should purge those influences from our language.  How am I demoting Punjabi? How am I saying we should stray away from Gurmukhi? In fact if you read any of my other threads you will realize I advocate further development of Gurmukhi and Punjabi. Why are you accusing me of things that I am opposed against in the first place?
    • The Saroop is only similar externally, ideologically there is a world of difference: https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2017/04/01/panj/
×