Jump to content

.


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
9 hours ago, sitokaur said:

my opinion on discussing Sikhi to non sikhs is IT IS VERY DANGEROUS JI, because even sikhs who have not received Vahiguroo's kirpa, sees pure hearted amritdharis as hypocrite, trouble, extremists ji.

Which is worse failing at something, (teaching people Sikhi), or never trying? Many Sikhs can only imagine the courage or the intelligence and open-mindedness like Jugraj Singh had. Amritdharis or Non-Amritdharis, Sikhs or Non-Sikhs, he was someone who could teach to the audience he was speaking to, which is more effective than some Gurdwara Pracharks talking about stuff not in the language of the common man, (I'm not talking about Punjabi or English, but language as in relatable topics). That's what separate great Pracharks from some good Pracharks, (both have best interests in Sangat, but one is better).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahiguroo Jio kirpa bhul chuk muaf_/\_, PRANAM ALWAYS TO BRAVE BASICS OF SIKHI LEADER BHAI JIO ATEY TEAM_/\_

But I am totally for TEACHING GURMUKHI, KEERTAN, AND THEN discussing Sikhi to ONLY TO OUR KAUM, YOUTH, SENIORS, AND ESPECIALLY ALL OF PUNJAB...SO OUR ENTIRE KAUM BECOME KHALSA PANTH, and then, KHALSA ACTIONS, WORDS, PERSONALITY, ET AL AS IN GURU PITA MAHARAJ GURU NANAK  DEV JIO ATTRACTED ALL LIKE A MAGNET TO HIMSELF, TO SIKHI...AS GURBANI, BHAI VIR SINGH JIO, ETC SIKH LITERATURE HAS CONVEYED Jio_/\_, without any effort or need to reach out to others as today's Sikh preachers.

Paviterr Charna Sikh Sangat hath jorr benti bhul chuk muaf, i am just a toree matt papee murakh, so my opinion is just as koor as i am_/\_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sitokaur said:

Vahiguroo Jio kirpa bhul chuk muaf_/\_, PRANAM ALWAYS TO BRAVE BASICS OF SIKHI LEADER BHAI JIO ATEY TEAM_/\_

But I am totally for TEACHING GURMUKHI, KEERTAN, AND THEN discussing Sikhi to ONLY TO OUR KAUM, YOUTH, SENIORS, AND ESPECIALLY ALL OF PUNJAB...SO OUR ENTIRE KAUM BECOME KHALSA PANTH, and then, KHALSA ACTIONS, WORDS, PERSONALITY, ET AL AS IN GURU PITA MAHARAJ GURU NANAK  DEV JIO ATTRACTED ALL LIKE A MAGNET TO HIMSELF, TO SIKHI...AS GURBANI, BHAI VIR SINGH JIO, ETC SIKH LITERATURE HAS CONVEYED Jio_/\_, without any effort or need to reach out to others as today's Sikh preachers.

Paviterr Charna Sikh Sangat hath jorr benti bhul chuk muaf, i am just a toree matt papee murakh, so my opinion is just as koor as i am_/\_

Penji you have nothing to be sorry about, it's your opinion. The thing is if you try to see it from a different point of view. If Sikhs don't do parchar to others than our own kaum, then how will people know about Sikhi. Sikhi doesn't just cover Sikh youth. It gives the message out for the whole world of humanity and God. Guru Nanak Dev ji didn't choose people from certain backgrounds or castes to get the message across. 

Nobody is forced to convert or any ideas enforced upon anybody. It's about getting the awareness across, because without it, Sikhs will be looked upon as another religion, just because of the colour of somebody's skin. It's important to let people know, we do not support extremism or tolerate any sort of activities. This is one of the reasons of parchar in different languages. If there is no parchar, then how will the world know about Sikhi? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use