amrit sanchar

[Akalifauj]

56 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

Guru Pita ji seemed to think it was necessary attire for Mata Bhaag Kaur ji also, he tied it on her head with his own hands

Necessary attire maybe, but keski is not a kakkar.  

[jkvlondon]

2 hours ago, Singh123456777 said:

What about all the puratan pics of bibis who had no keski on their head? What about a lot of female sants who didnt cover head with keski? 

Im not saying dont wear a keski or not, personally my family does wear it(not as a kakaar) but im just trying to give you a different perspective so we can be open minded cause what puratan sikhs did were much different than today sikhs

don't worry My Nani never wore one and she managed to have partak darshan of Nauvin Patshah, it's more about internal sharda but it is true that sikhs came in myriad shades 

[simran345]

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

don't worry My Nani never wore one and she managed to have partak darshan of Nauvin Patshah, it's more about internal sharda but it is true that sikhs came in myriad shades 

Wow amazing. 

[jkvlondon]

4 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Necessary attire maybe, but keski is not a kakkar.  

OK explain how one can simply do an ardas if kakkar comes away from sareer  and resume rehit ;Yet if one removes even one kes/rom from sareer one becomes patit and has to reinitiate in sikhi by doing pesh in front of Panj and Guru Granth Sahib ji? Can only be one or the other. Kesh  are naturally a part of your body and occur according to hukham, some people just never get kesh or lose it through disease does that mean they can never have amrit?

[Akalifauj]

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

OK explain how one can simply do an ardas if kakkar comes away from sareer  and resume rehit ;Yet if one removes even one kes/rom from sareer one becomes patit and has to reinitiate in sikhi by doing pesh in front of Panj and Guru Granth Sahib ji? Can only be one or the other. Kesh  are naturally a part of your body and occur according to hukham, some people just never get kesh or lose it through disease does that mean they can never have amrit?

Guru Gobind Singh ji has said kes are kakkar.  Punj kakkar are written in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji.  If someone never gets Kesh they can never be patit by removing kes.  They can take amrit, why can't they take amrit?  Just as you, akj people try to rationalize the illogical and anti Gurmat new find practice of adding women to punj pyare, this was done in the past by akj.  Gurmat clearly says kes are kakkar. Some akj people think its alright for homosexuals to have an anand karaj.  It never ends with jatha.  They have new demands every season.

[Guest]

51 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Guru Gobind Singh ji has said kes are kakkar.  Punj kakkar are written in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji.  If someone never gets Kesh they can never be patit by removing kes.  They can take amrit, why can't they take amrit?  Just as you, akj people try to rationalize the illogical and anti Gurmat new find practice of adding women to punj pyare, this was done in the past by akj.  Gurmat clearly says kes are kakkar. Some akj people think its alright for homosexuals to have an anand karaj.  It never ends with jatha.  They have new demands every season.

For once an a+ post 

[Guest Jacfsing2]

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

OK explain how one can simply do an ardas if kakkar comes away from sareer  and resume rehit ;Yet if one removes even one kes/rom from sareer one becomes patit and has to reinitiate in sikhi by doing pesh in front of Panj and Guru Granth Sahib ji? Can only be one or the other. Kesh  are naturally a part of your body and occur according to hukham, some people just never get kesh or lose it through disease does that mean they can never have amrit?

*(Keski is very important and this is not an attack on Keski). The same could genuinely be said about any Kakkar. If someone who's bald wants to take Amrit, I don't think the Punj Pyare should stop them for that particular reason, (though they should have complete right on who to give it to). Someone could ask what's the point of a Kangha for a bald Amritdhari, to that I'd say it reminds them of cleanliness. 

1 hour ago, Akalifauj said:

Some akj people think its alright for homosexuals to have an anand karaj. 

I'm not really a fan of AKJ, but I've never heard of this before. 

[jkvlondon]

8 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Guru Gobind Singh ji has said kes are kakkar.  Punj kakkar are written in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji.  If someone never gets Kesh they can never be patit by removing kes.  They can take amrit, why can't they take amrit?  Just as you, akj people try to rationalize the illogical and anti Gurmat new find practice of adding women to punj pyare, this was done in the past by akj.  Gurmat clearly says kes are kakkar. Some akj people think its alright for homosexuals to have an anand karaj.  It never ends with jatha.  They have new demands every season.

1. I am not AKJ anything ...chill

2. I am asking because others may wonder (of course I know that hukham trumps everything and that there is no restriction . However people will wonder as they may never have that fifth kakkar if they had alopecea totalis say)

3. never heard ANY sikh say Anand Karaj for homosexuals  was jehaiz ...I don't know what you been taking but calm down on the mudslinging