Jump to content
Guest Singh

Dhadrianwale exposed

Recommended Posts

chatanga    1,068
On 11/08/2017 at 11:47 AM, JS79 said:

 

But come on. Almost anybody is better than dhumma.

 

And everyone can  be better than "Professor Sarnjit Singh "Khalsa/dhapali" who tried to make his Guru out to be some kind of pervert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chatanga    1,068
On 07/08/2017 at 1:49 PM, JS79 said:

Darshan singh has been ex communicated.

 

On 07/08/2017 at 4:29 PM, JS79 said:

Hanji. Most panthic people that i know of, have always opposed darshan singh to the hilt.

I wouldnt say 'accept' because that makes it sound like darshan singh is my friend lol i would say 'aware'.

 

On 10/08/2017 at 10:51 PM, JS79 said:

I opposed darshan singh very strongly.

 

"Singh?" No Sikh of the Guru calls darshan rogi by that name. You pretend that you don't support him, when its very apparent that you do.

 

 

On 10/08/2017 at 5:18 PM, Guest JKaur said:

I just wanted to point out whoever said the bullet hole was in the back of his head, if you knew a bit about forensics (even watching CSI you'd know) that a bullet has two wounds, entry and exit. The exit is always larger and bleeds more. It's because the bullet enters creating a hole size of the round but then due to tissue and bone gets squished on itself, this causes it drag tissue along with it towards the exit. More debris exiting than what went in initially and the force causes a larger exit wound as it explodes outward. So the bullet was not from behind. It was from in front and exit wound was at back of his head. (Experience in forensics) 

 

If you knew a little more about bullets hitting bodies then you would know that that the momentum of the bullet would take the object with it, instead of travelling towards the shooter.  If you knew even more about shootings you would know that not all shots have exit wounds, and not all exit wounds are bigger than the entry wounds. Nice try though.

 

However as the photo that we have seen only shows one wound, it is not been said whether this is the entrance or exit. And with shotguns the entry can easily be as big as the exit, if not bigger as the bullet fragments as its being shot (expereince in watching people being killed by shotguns.)

 

Do you want a link to some Jkaur? (to add to your experience?)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S1ngh    1,394
On 8/5/2017 at 10:36 PM, JS79 said:

Missionaries definitely are not the ones out for peoples blood. They dont seem very violent by the looks of things. They dont hold shabeels.

Just saying.

Brother, missnaris don't basically believe in anything and far away to understand the concept of shabeels. All they do is whine, whine and whine on any issue.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JS79    338
47 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

Brother, missnaris don't basically believe in anything and far away to understand the concept of shabeels. All they do is whine, whine and whine on any issue.

My point was they dont kill innocents by holding a shabeel.

All taksalis do is shout scream and cry and shoot.

And admins are biased so will delete my postm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S1ngh    1,394
8 hours ago, JS79 said:

My point was they dont kill innocents by holding a shabeel.

All taksalis do is shout scream and cry and shoot.

And admins are biased so will delete my postm.

They do the different kind of killing. They should rename their name to "India Scientology".

it is never good to generalizing the whole group by bad deeds of few. You post a picture of child  before here and do you even who is sitting behind that child??

admins are against missnaris and their tola. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JS79    338
5 hours ago, S1ngh said:

They do the different kind of killing. They should rename their name to "India Scientology".

it is never good to generalizing the whole group by bad deeds of few. You post a picture of child  before here and do you even who is sitting behind that child??

admins are against missnaris and their tola. 

Taking a life is extreme mate. I aint missionary. But nobody can justify an innocent killing. If someone has opposing views you gonna kill em? We dont kill. 

Admins can be against them. The panth is against dhumma. 

Im quality control because the admins want no missionary photo? Wow thats some good reason. We dont want dhummas name on gutke but we cant do nothing about that can we. We cant control everything even dhumma cant control everything.

That child was shaheed bhupinder singhs son. 

Are u the admin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S1ngh    1,394
6 hours ago, JS79 said:

That child was shaheed bhupinder singhs son.

The person sitting behind him is Bhai Ram Singh from Taksal. You were creating a fictional story of using little kid of saying "what taksal did to my dad etc etc." That makes zero sense as jatehdar sahib and major Taksal personality just sitting right behind him to support them.  Veeray, do some research before making sensational Indian type daytime crazy shows.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,264
7 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

The person sitting behind him is Bhai Ram Singh from Taksal. You were creating a fictional story of using little kid of saying "what taksal did to my dad etc etc." That makes zero sense as jatehdar sahib and major Taksal personality just sitting right behind him to support them.  Veeray, do some research before making sensational Indian type daytime crazy shows.

I think he's watched a little too much Star Plus.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S1ngh    1,394
Just now, Kira said:

I think he's watched a little too much Star Plus.

😂

nonethless, he is our brother walking on wrong path. Hopefully we will guide him to smooth path collectively. It takes a village to raise a proper child ✌️

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,264
49 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Yeah. Just a small benti to the admins: Please don't ban @JS79 or @singhunit. So far as I have seen, they have argued vigorously for their views, but haven't made the mistake of use bad vocabulary like the detestable Inder Singh Ghagga. @JS79 has even disavowed Ragi Darshan Singh, showing that he's not a blind missionary robot. Only by engaging with Sikhs who have been infected with the missionary mindset can we hope to make progress in refuting their (missionaries') nonsense. Not only that, but the vast majority of people who come to this site never post. You have to have arguments present to them in order to dissuade them of the missionary mindset. And you can only have an argument if you have an opposing side.

While I second this. Another small Benti might be to remove the anonymous like system. Nothing malicious but I'd love to see how everyones views differ on his.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BhForce    536
12 minutes ago, Kira said:

While I second this. Another small Benti might be to remove the anonymous like system. Nothing malicious but I'd love to see how everyones views differ on his.

Oh, is there a non-anonymous like system? That would be good, if that's just a small setting that the admins can set. The only reason I say that is that there seemed to be some abuse of the system in that one thread noted by, I think, @Jacfsing2, about sockpuppet accounts liking some newbies posts within minutes of the post.

Myself, I only like a very small number of exceptional posts, not necessarily even ones that even 100% agree with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,264
9 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Oh, is there a non-anonymous like system? That would be good, if that's just a small setting that the admins can set. The only reason I say that is that there seemed to be some abuse of the system in that one thread noted by, I think, @Jacfsing2, about sockpuppet accounts liking some newbies posts within minutes of the post.

Myself, I only like a very small number of exceptional posts, not necessarily even ones that even 100% agree with.

there used to be yes bro. Made it easier for user to decipher fake accounts from real ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JS79    338
3 hours ago, S1ngh said:

The person sitting behind him is Bhai Ram Singh from Taksal. You were creating a fictional story of using little kid of saying "what taksal did to my dad etc etc." That makes zero sense as jatehdar sahib and major Taksal personality just sitting right behind him to support them.  Veeray, do some research before making sensational Indian type daytime crazy shows.

I respect raam singh ji. I assumed ppl who were reading my posts knew i am referring to dhumma. Also, we can all say that dhumma isnt jathedar or we dont believe he is etc but until he isnt removed from that post (and maybe replaced with raam singh for eg) then until then he will still be the main taksal leader and he will continue to repressnt taksal. We know that its only a handful of taksalis but they are the MAIN ones who think they own taksal. Who exacty from mehta has opposed dhumma? 

I didnt create a story. I said (and many people use this phrase for these sons) they will grow up at ask such questions. How is that a story?

Also s1ngh i dont know what indian shows you watch, but i have done my research. I dont blindly follow taksal. In taksal all they do is tell old stories, and akhri arth, they should do some research too and see if the stories are even true. Maybe even research if gurmat agrees!

3 hours ago, Kira said:

I think he's watched a little too much Star Plus.

I do not watch tv etc. I know most taksalis do though.

3 hours ago, S1ngh said:

😂

nonethless, he is our brother walking on wrong path. Hopefully we will guide him to smooth path collectively. It takes a village to raise a proper child ✌️

I was 100% pro-taksal. I now chose this path after many years of thought on this matter. To you my path is wrong to me your path is wrong. Jathebandis only create distraction. 

@BhForce

Thank u and yes im not missionary. Id rather not be anything related to a jatha. 

But If i had to pick jathas id pick akj.

Most jathe have major issues esp in leadership but in my arguments the point i was making was missionaries are more respected plus they have not done what dhumma has. They havent brutally killed an innocent. Thats made taksal crumble. Does this mean i support missionaries 100%? No. I was making a comparison. Admins need to be wise. Missionaries are not bad. Some may be, but then arent you generalising them? 

Majority of taksalis cannot sit and have a convo without swearing so personally i feel taksal has no hope. Whereas with a missionary you can have a descent controversial convo and still be calm. 

I try to have a panthic mindset. 

I probably wont post since admin have to approve. I dont need anyones approval. This is deffo a biased forum. 

Admins, I think you cant bear to listen to the truth about taksal. Todays taksal. Please rename this taksalforum.com. the name is very much misleading ji. Since you ban anyone with different views. Brilliant!

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,467
2 hours ago, BhForce said:

about sockpuppet accounts liking some newbies posts within minutes of the post.

Sometimes it was seconds, like recently 😏.

Edited by simran345
Added more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×