Jump to content
Guest Singh

Dhadrianwale exposed

Recommended Posts

Guest Singh

No ninda just straight facts and truths 

1-swearing in maharajs presences last year when he challenged damdami taksal

2- He pooped and peed his pants when he was being beat up by singhs and had to hide with bahyai until arrived to find him trembling 

3 - He has security forces from government and speaks much trash with ego nowadays

4 - When he went to america he made sangat take off big kirpans or sri sahibs

Etc. I cant recall much more information but I think taksal mehta is innocent. 

Sant baba harnam singh

1- no security guards or government cars besides singhs just lies by dadrianwale.

2- Shaheedi Yadgarh. No one else could make it only baba ji did and under tense circumstances 9 months to construct . 

3- govt allies. People need to understand that political power was needed to construct the dhageedi yadhgarh and gallery. Miri and piri concept by guru hargobind sahib ji maharaj. Notably baba ji is perceived wrong by associating with the cruel governemt. However baba ji did anything needed to get the yadhgarh done as it was very important for the future generations to remember what happened. Sadly if you go to darbar sahib baba gurbaksh singh ji has barely anything in his memory nor does baba deep singh. The history of what happened in 84 cant be forgetten or maligned for future generations despite as much as government may try. Thoughts , no hate in comments. Any doubts just google stuff. I think was wrong how the world turned against damdami taksal and sided with a nindek but then again it is kalyijug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/07/2017 at 1:23 AM, Guest Singh said:

No ninda just straight facts and truths 

1-swearing in maharajs presences last year when he challenged damdami taksal

2- He pooped and peed his pants when he was being beat up by singhs and had to hide with bahyai until arrived to find him trembling 

3 - He has security forces from government and speaks much trash with ego nowadays

4 - When he went to america he made sangat take off big kirpans or sri sahibs

Etc. I cant recall much more information but I think taksal mehta is innocent. 

Sant baba harnam singh

1- no security guards or government cars besides singhs just lies by dadrianwale.

2- Shaheedi Yadgarh. No one else could make it only baba ji did and under tense circumstances 9 months to construct . 

3- govt allies. People need to understand that political power was needed to construct the dhageedi yadhgarh and gallery. Miri and piri concept by guru hargobind sahib ji maharaj. Notably baba ji is perceived wrong by associating with the cruel governemt. However baba ji did anything needed to get the yadhgarh done as it was very important for the future generations to remember what happened. Sadly if you go to darbar sahib baba gurbaksh singh ji has barely anything in his memory nor does baba deep singh. The history of what happened in 84 cant be forgetten or maligned for future generations despite as much as government may try. Thoughts , no hate in comments. Any doubts just google stuff. I think was wrong how the world turned against damdami taksal and sided with a nindek but then again it is kalyijug

one man does not a taksal make , simple enough to understand . yet it only takes one to drag its izzat through the mud.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/17/2017 at 5:53 AM, Guest Singh said:

4 - When he went to america he made sangat take off big kirpans or sri sahibs

What? That really happened? Dhadrianwale made people take off kirpans? Any details on that?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, BhForce said:

What? That really happened? Dhadrianwale made people take off kirpans? Any details on that?

 

On 17/07/2017 at 1:23 AM, Guest Singh said:

 

4 - When he went to america he made sangat take off big kirpans or sri sahibs

 

can we have more info on this?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The truth. Repeat.

Can we all grow up. The op needs a new hobby stop repeating. U have already made a thread on which i replied. Hows about you show your face? Make a video with jagowale? Or ajnala or tividale? I again will paste what i have ALREADY written. If you have the time to create a load of propaganda on dhadrianwale you should have the time to read the responses. Taksal has so many issues you will have to listen to them if u continue to spread false facts. The kirpan issue is not even true. I request admins to take a panthic stance. 

I forgot to mention, what is the point in building the yaadgaar if he is going to oppose sant jis teachings. A picture of sant does not make up for going against sant jis teachings. Sant ji promoted gurbani and truth. Sant ji were one of their kind! Sant ji NEVER sucked up to politics. Also yes at that point dhumma gained respect for the yadgar however his following actions have destroyed anything he has ever done. He may aswell have not built it. Nothing can make up for killing gursikhs. The real gursikhs on maharajs path. The true yadgar is inside us. Forget who is missionary or taksali. What does it even mean to be taksali anymore? A killer? A murderer? 

Taksal fans cannot get over themselves. Do something for the panth stop USING bhindranwale. stop bashing dhadrianwale just because they bring taksals fault to light. Their motive it to break all the walls between jathebandis and gather as one and do sikhi parchar. Taksals one and only motive is to kill dhadrianwale. They confess. Sangat is wise. Very wise. Fighting will never give anybody respect, it is logic. 

Below is my last response to the op. 

I respect baba thakir singh ji immensely however their bachan cannot be abive guru granth sahib. Agreed? 

Maharaj says dont lie and dont support liers. Maharaj says stand by the truth and maharaj will support you hence why Dhadrianwale are always in chardikala no matter what. "Sache da sacha dhoa". 

Bhindranwale will always be respected they have given their blood for us. Dhumma is using their blood to gain respect. Baba thakur singh could be wrong. They said many things. Of course i am not challenging them as they could be saying these bachans on another level or metaphorically. Taksal has lost respect because dhumma has forced himself to be jathedar. He isnt like sant kartar singh or jarnail singh. They were a different soul. 

Yes dhaddianwale have security BECAUSE dhumma paid for the whole situation to happen. He didnt for a split second think of what would happen if dhadrianwale came out alive. He didnt even think that could happen. Dhadrianwales life is in danger because of dhummas stupidity and jealousy. I am saying this from knowing him quite personally. Dhumma swears on a daily basis and so do his shoe lickers jasowal and jeeva etc. The outside peherava makes them likeable by us people. 

To the OP. Was you the bahiya? Dhadrianwale did not even change clothes and the clothes only had blood on. So get your facts right. LMAO.

Harnam singhs anver can be smelt from miles. His arrogant nature and rude words prove that. Dhadrianwale speak with love.

Dhadrianwale do not have blood on their hands whereas dhumma does. He also has badals feet on his head. He also has badals jhoothe ladoo in his throat. Dhumma was selected by a secret agency to own mehta. The place has no value without maharaj. As to the bachan.... if mehta gets relocated does that mean the bachan follows? Do not make such mockery of baba thakur singh. We all know that baba thakur singh have passed away therefor panth nindaks can use this as an easy escape route... just say 'baba thakur singh ji said so....". 

Time has changed and people will no longer take that as an answer. Baba thakur singh also said bhindranwale are in chardikala. People who use their heads will know this can be interpreted in numerous ways! In 50 years what wjll you say? That bhindranwale done yoga to make the life span long and will come back to make khalistan? Please respect the shaheedi. 

If bhindranwale were alive they would not go killing chardikala panthic parcharaks. They would support them. Dhumma sleeps and eats all day he begs people to attend his samagams he has his own picture and name and gutke published. He places "sant" infront of his name and sant kartar singh would never have agreed to that. He has named a vidialla and again his name is printed abive it... sant giani... blah blah. 

When sangat call dhadrianwale sant it is by sangat choice. Also the security is because of the demand if the sangat. Dhadrianwale would prefer to be a brother to the veer singhs but what can they do? Walk freely and have themself shot? Of course that would make taksal die hard fans very happy because they can go and own parmeshardwar.... from their track record this is the only thing they know how to do..

Dhadrianwale jatha singhs are very humble and hard working. Dhummas jatha are killers and murderers. It is not a safe place to visit. Dhumma begged sangat to vote badal...... HAHAHA. Now that is hilarious. I dont even know where to start with that one. 

Dhumma admits to his doings and that proves he is a criminal. Just because killing innicents isnt a bajjar kurehat it doesnt mean dhumma is a good lad. 

Dhumma has no inner peace and dhadrianwale are very calm and content and inspirational...... no proof needed just watch a divan..... ANY diwan has more sangat interested and singing gurbani than dhumma has seen on his 6june samagam. Dhummas losing his voice too and his probably going to die of jealousy very soon anyway. From the perspective of someone who has spoken to dhumma..... it is sad to see taksal spiral downwards. Stop using previous jathedars to backup dhummas antics. Follow the truth and only thr truth. 

No apologies for telling the truth.

Gurkirpa.

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest singh

he made them take off big kirpans like bigger shashtars, and allowed small kirpans in sangat only in regards to when he went to america

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if he did make sangat take off 'bigger shaster'....fair play to him for taking a stand. You expect him to not be cautious after his own 'Sikh' brothers trying to kill him? P.s can you tell me 1 thing you have done for the panth

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, singhunit said:

Even if he did make sangat take off 'bigger shaster'....fair play to him for taking a stand. You expect him to not be cautious after his own 'Sikh' brothers trying to kill him? P.s can you tell me 1 thing you have done for the panth

First of all, let me condemn all of these killings and so forth.

He can be cautious all he wants, that's his prerogative. He can walk around (or sit on the stage) with bodyguards like Floyd Mayweather does:

3118073200000578-3439602-image-a-120_145

The bodyguards can be armed to the hilt, with AK-47s, AR-15s, rocket launchers, whatever. Sant Dhadrianwale can sit with a bullet-proof vest, or even behind bullet-proof glass, like the President of the United States:

article-2344787-1A671657000005DC-744_634

But he does not have the right to change the maryada of Gurughar. He cannot ban a kirpan. He cannot ban the thing that Guru Sahib says that, without it, do not come to see the Guru:

ਬਿਨਾ ਤੇਗ ਕੇਸੰ ਦੇਵਹੁ ਨ ਦੀਦਾਰੇ|

He is not Guru, only a Sant. A Sant only has the right to preach the maryada of Guru, not to change it. Let's leave aside the fact that a true Sant wouldn't be afraid of death.

The death that he thinks he is protecting himself from can come at anytime. It can come from someone (without a big kirpan) who is just bending down to give "bheta" on stage. It is not necessarily going to come from a big kirpan. 

I do not think he is going to be killed, nor even attempted to be killed, either by a big kirpan, little one, or anything else. But by changing the maryada of Gurughar, he has done a great wrong.

To answer your question, I have not done anything for the Panth other than post on Internet messageboards. But that still does not give Sant Dhadrianwale to change the maryada of Sikhi.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, singhunit said:

Fateh

Who said he is changing Maryada?. You can't have it both ways - you want the panth to flourish and when someone tries to do that everyone attacks him? Would you rather he stopped pachar and the thousands stopped coming onto the path of Sikhi?

For the record - I'm not affliated to any jathebandi.

WJKK WJKF

You. You said he is chaning maryada. You just praised him for banning Kirpans in his divans in your post above.

By definition, that's changing maryada. Let me spell it out for you:

1. Guru Gobind Singh ji created the original maryada, telling Sikhs to not show up to the Darbar without Teg (kirpan).

2. Sant Dhadrianwale (by your admission) banned Kirpans from his divans.

When you go from #1 to #2, that's a change (in Maryada).

I haven't said a thing in this thread about his parchar. I did say that no matter how big of a Sant he is, he does not have the right to change maryada. Do you disagree? (I.e., do you think he is so big, he can change the Guru's maryada?)

You can't both praise him for banning Kirpans, and also say he didn't change maryada.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
41 minutes ago, singhunit said:

Fateh

Who said he is changing Maryada?. You can't have it both ways - you want the panth to flourish and when someone tries to do that everyone attacks him? Would you rather he stopped pachar and the thousands stopped coming onto the path of Sikhi?

For the record - I'm not affliated to any jathebandi.

WJKK WJKF

You can't support Dhardianwale's decision to ban kirpans and oppose it as well, that's a contradiction. In the past he was very supportive of Kakkars, sometimes he had a 3ft. Kirpan with him to prove that. What @BhForce is trying to say is that you can't change basic Maryada, especially at a Gurdwara.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
26 minutes ago, BhForce said:

You. You said he is chaning maryada. You just praised him for banning Kirpans in his divans in your post above.

By definition, that's changing maryada. Let me spell it out for you:

1. Guru Gobind Singh ji created the original maryada, telling Sikhs to not show up to the Darbar without Teg (kirpan).

2. Sant Dhadrianwale (by your admission) banned Kirpans from his divans.

When you go from #1 to #2, that's a change (in Maryada).

I haven't said a thing in this thread about his parchar. I did say that no matter how big of a Sant he is, he does not have the right to change maryada. Do you disagree? (I.e., do you think he is so big, he can change the Guru's maryada?)

You can't both praise him for banning Kirpans, and also say he didn't change maryada.

Totally agree with everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×