Dhadrianwale exposed

[jkvlondon]

2 hours ago, S1ngh said:

It changes when you do this for a living. You depend on others to make money and thus keep quiet regardless of whatever filth flies around. 

he does look visibly upset by what he is hearing though, maybe he is worried about creating a fight in front of sangat/Guru ji Waheguru ji mehr karan himself from all the nonsense. reminds me of Mohinder Singh SDO did so many years of excellent kirtan and Gurbani exposition during the eighties then he took 'the fall' because of haumai  and started speaking out of line stuff. Can happen to anyone if they are not vigilant... sad really

somebody should have asked him about Gur Pita ji's advice to eat little , sleep little, to wake up amritvela, nobody goes outside of hukam so his speil is totally off track , referring to hukam and making it out that one should not do udham and conquer sukh nindra to get phal of simaran  ...didn't think I'd get to see this.

[SoulSingh]

If this type of parchar offends you don't listen to him. Just keep listening to people like dhumma and banta singh. Why do you insist on cramming your view(s) of sikhi down others' throats? Now you guys are after NKJ? Honestly man if it doesn't match your taste, listen other parcharaks. At the end of the day he tells everyone to read guru sahib for themselves, if you guys are right, then why are you worried? 

[Akalifauj]

12 minutes ago, SoulSingh said:

If this type of parchar offends you don't listen to him. Just keep listening to people like dhumma and banta singh. Why do you insist on cramming your view(s) of sikhi down others' throats? Now you guys are after NKJ? Honestly man if it doesn't match your taste, listen other parcharaks. At the end of the day he tells everyone to read guru sahib for themselves, if you guys are right, then why are you worried? 

Listen to the video.  Ranjit is sitting on the stage telling people to not to do simran.  Gurbani says to do simran with your tongue, mouth, mind, and heart.  Even a dog cries for his owner.  Ranjit has no owner.  He is a beymukh.

[chatanga]

12 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

he does look visibly upset by what he is hearing though, maybe he is worried about creating a fight in front of sangat/Guru ji

He certainly doesn't look like he is comfortable with what is being said. Harinder Singh hasn't got the support base that dhadrianwale has, so knows he is more vulnerable.

 

1 hour ago, SoulSingh said:

If this type of parchar offends you don't listen to him. Just keep listening to people like dhumma and banta singh.

Whatever Baba Harnam Singh's political activities are, he doesnt tell lies about Sikhi.

 

1 hour ago, SoulSingh said:

Why do you insist on cramming your view(s) of sikhi down others' throats?

 

Why do you insist on supporting missionaries and their view of Sikhi?

If their was anything correct woith what dhadrinwale had said in that video, you would have lead with it. Instead like me, you know he is wrong, but unlike me you will not admit it or accept it.

 

1 hour ago, SoulSingh said:

 Honestly man if it doesn't match your taste, listen other parcharaks.

 

Match our taste? You talking about Gurmat practices for the last 300 years? Why wouldnt Gurmat match our tastes? And why is this missionary nastik stuff that dhadrianwale is peddling matching your tastes?

 

1 hour ago, SoulSingh said:

At the end of the day he tells everyone to read guru sahib for themselves, if you guys are right, then why are you worried? 

 

He doesn't tell everyone to read Gurbani for themselves. he tells them to listen to his own idiotic analysis of Gurbani. If this missionary dhadrianwala wanted everyone to read Gurbani then that would be the only thing he would say in his diwans. But no, he is telling all these cult followers of himself that "to wake up and do simran is against God's laws..."

 

There is no  dispute here that dhadrianwala is wrong here, but what worries me, is that he has access to thousands of his cult members who see his own stupidity as the truth and are blinded by his cult personality to be decide what is the truth. And then they are not able to stand up for the truth.

 

A lot like yourself really...soul-less Singh.

[chatanga]

12 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

  ...didn't think I'd get to see this.

 

Well to be honest I don't think many people would have ever expected this.But lucky for you, at least you can recognise this cult leader. Others on here are still blind to the fact that they are in a cult.

[S1ngh]

10 hours ago, SoulSingh said:

If this type of parchar offends you don't listen to him. Just keep listening to people like dhumma and banta singh. Why do you insist on cramming your view(s) of sikhi down others' throats? Now you guys are after NKJ? Honestly man if it doesn't match your taste, listen other parcharaks. At the end of the day he tells everyone to read guru sahib for themselves, if you guys are right, then why are you worried? 

Don’t tell me brother that you SUPPORT him on Amritvela issue ?

[S1ngh]

Please see the reply on amritvela from Gurmat Bibek Singhs toward dadhre cult leader:

 

[chatanga]

5 hours ago, S1ngh said:

Don’t tell me brother that you SUPPORT him on Amritvela issue ?

 

it's obvious this guy is a cult follower.

[SoulSingh]

Look I don't have the time at the moment, to answer each of you individually but I will say this much, I'm not against Amrit vela I myself follow it. From what I understand from the clip above I reason Dhandrian wale isn't either , but just because someone has different views doesn't mean they're wrong. Also on that note: @chatanga look believe what you want about me, I don't care if you think I'm in a cult, but I recommend you learn to become a sikh. From the way you generally try to do veechars I think it'd in your best to cut down on the haumai a bit. 

 

[Also I will answer these questions to the best of my ability when I have time.] 

[jkvlondon]

only five years ago this was his parchar: