Jump to content

Dhadrianwale exposed


Guest Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 03/08/2017 at 7:48 AM, singhunit said:

 

On that note Dhumma is no better, who is he to throw his weight around and order the killing of fellow SIKH BROTHERS. You don't see Bhai Guriqbal Singh behaving like that?

 

What sikh brothers has Harnam Singh ordered to be killed?

 

On 03/08/2017 at 2:53 AM, JS79 said:

Lazy? Yeah 3 diwans a day is that lazy.

Gurmat knowledge according to what you believe is gurmat? They already do gurmat gyan according to gurbani and what maharaj teach us through gurbani. 

 

Doing a/3 diwan(s) is not exercise for someone. For an orator its an easy job.

 

On 03/08/2017 at 9:19 AM, JS79 said:

You are mistaken by sirsa wala

He also made his form of 'amrit' 

Dhumma approved it also.

 

God help me? How many more lies are you going to post here?

 

Whilst we are on the subject lets talk about darshan rogi and his form of "amrit".

 

Which missionary has opposed this rogi ? "Professor" Sarbjit singh "Khalsa"?   dhapali?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chatanga said:

Doing a/3 diwan(s) is not exercise for someone. For an orator its an easy job.

To be fair, I think we should acknowledge that doing 3 divans a day (including travel) is quite taxing. And I praised him for doing so when I thought that, on balance, he was doing good by bringing people into and inspiring people about Sikhism.

3 hours ago, chatanga said:

Whilst we are on the subject lets talk about darshan rogi and his form of "amrit".

Excellent point. If some Sikhs are ready to kill the Sirsa chief (and even Sirsa followers) for creating a separate "amrit", then why would the same logic not apply to missionaries who have created a new "amrit"? Understand that I am not calling for violence against missionaries, just as I am on another thread saying that we should not be violent toward non-violent Sirsa-followers, so I am consistent in that regard.

But, for Sikhs (esp. missionaries) who are out for the Sirsa chief's blood, why does the same logic not apply to Ragi Darshan "Singh" (who created a new "panth" after Guru Gobind Singh ji's Khalsa Panth of 1699) and Giani Kuldeep "Singh" of the Virginia gurdwara that created a new form of "amrit" separate from Guru Gobind Singh ji's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Guest phittey munh terrei said:

What are you a murderer? You are asking them to kill people for your sadistic satisfaction. You are nothing but a vampire or a coward hiding in a closet waiting to come out

:hairan: Did you miss this sentence in  my comment?

On 8/5/2017 at 4:37 AM, BhForce said:

Understand that I am not calling for violence against missionaries, just as I am on another thread saying that we should not be violent toward non-violent Sirsa-followers, so I am consistent in that regard.

I'm calling for non-violent responses to both the Sirsa-followers (many/most of whom are misguided Sikhs) and to the missionaries (misguided fellow Sikhs).

Here's some more explanation: There are many Sikhs (both on this board and in real life) who are out for the blood of Sirsa-followers (not me, though). Some of them have missionary-type thinking, even liking Ragi Darshan Singh. Now what I'm saying is a simple point of logic: If making your own Amrit separate from 10th Guru is cause for killing you, then the Sirsa baba is liable to be killed. But then also, the same logic applies to Ragi Darshan Singh and Giani Kuldeep Singh of Virginia. Explain why it does not.

Again, I am not calling for violence against missionaries. (I am calling for non-violent responses.)

The logic also applies to non-violent responses: If making your own Amrit separate from 10th Guru is cause for boycotting you, then the Sirsa baba is liable to be socially-boycotted. And his supporters. The same logic applies to Ragi Darshan Singh and Giani Kuldeep Singh of Virginia. And their supporters. Explain why the logic does not apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missionaries definitely are not the ones out for peoples blood here. They're not very violent by the looks of things. They dont hold shabeels.

Just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JS79 said:

Missionaries definitely are not the ones out for peoples blood. They dont seem very violent by the looks of things. They dont hold shabeels.

Just saying.

I addressed both violent and non-violent responses to Sirsa.

You posted about the separate form of Amrit:

On 8/3/2017 at 1:49 PM, JS79 said:

You are mistaken by sirsa wala

He also made his form of 'amrit' 

Dhumma approved it also.

And I asked anybody who has missionary viewpoints who is against Sirsa baba for creating a different Amrit than the 10th Guru to explain why the same logic does not apply to Ragi Darshan "Singh" and Giani Kuldeep "Singh" of Virginia. So go ahead and do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, BhForce said:

I addressed both violent and non-violent responses to Sirsa.

You posted about the separate form of Amrit:

And I asked anybody who has missionary viewpoints who is against Sirsa baba for creating a different Amrit than the 10th Guru to explain why the same logic does not apply to Ragi Darshan "Singh" and Giani Kuldeep "Singh" of Virginia. So go ahead and do so.

Darshan singh has been ex communicated. That is a fair punishment is it not.

My argument was in reg to innocent killings. The main uproar is that dhumma forgave sirsa yet took an innicent life. We havent forgiven darshan singh, sirsa or dhumma and nor will we. 

Taksal killed a panthic parcharak when there are bad ppl on the loose. Dhumma never opposed sirsa yet adamant to kill dhadrianwale.  Interesting. These things makes sangat question taksals real motive. Dhumma never opposed sirsa this much! 

We can continue to disown the pakhandis and panth gaddaars we dont have to kill to prevent them from preaching their stuff. We can prevent in simpler ways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use