singhbj singh

Sikh Radicalisation in Britain

8 posts in this topic

The title of the presentation seems to be at odds with the content. Radicalisation is a loaded term. Why not go with 'activism' as he does in the description? I know why he's done it, but it's careless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The wording could have been better but if were honest there is some radicalisation as there is with all communities however Sikh radicalization/ political activism is directed at islamo-fascist pedo sexual abuse grooming and islamic dawah conversion gangs and also the tyranny and genocidal brutality of the indian govt and its terrorist armed forces.

I would suggest right wing political minded and engaged Sikhs work with this guy rather than bash him so that his research, info and conclusions isn't all one way propaganda sources from far left wing idiots who are in bed with islamo-facists and other enemies of Sikhs.
 

 

Edited by superkaur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, superkaur said:

The wording could have been better but if were honest there is some radicalisation as there is with all communities however Sikh radicalization/ political activism is directed at islamo-fascist pedo sexual abuse grooming and islamic dawah conversion gangs and also the tyranny and genocidal brutality of the indian govt and its terrorist armed forces.

The way most *rational people view radical is someone that forces others to comply to their will. The official definition is: "a person who holds or follows strong convictions or extreme principles; extremist." Standing-up for what's right is not some extreme thought, in fact this ideology is universal and has existed throughout cultures. The Orientals, Subcontinentals,(though Punjabis are going down the wrong path), Africans, Hispanics, and formerly the Europeans, (again used to, now they are just corrupted with white guilt b.s.), all believe in this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

The title of the presentation seems to be at odds with the content. Radicalisation is a loaded term. Why not go with 'activism' as he does in the description? I know why he's done it, but it's careless. 

there's one more buffoon "sikh" in india who posts random crrap against sikhs . I wonder what these guys get from doing gaddari with kaum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Islam is seen as enemy by sikh community because historically it has been more direct in its violence against us.

Hindus (atleast the ones with an agenda as are more common nowadays than ever) are subtle . Ironically, they would pat you on the back for doing your share of history in protecting hindus , some of them would romanticize Guru Gobind Singh ji's image as savior of hindus from mughal barbarians , but while doing so they also silently leave the bomb of "you are us" and most of our apne are too coconut to get the stealth here. 

Islam's weapon is external , the sword and bloodshed, to exterminate an enemy.

Brahminism's weapon is more subtler , "you are us", "you're part of us", "you're born out of us", "weren't your ancestors hindu" , I can't count how many times I have been told all this crrap . Whats rude is how dare they get to define us. 

I remember a sammelan where head priests of different indian religions were present . Among the crowd of saffron clad swamis , a hindu priest stood up after the jain muni was done speaking, and he said about jainism "Its not even a different religion. Its a part of hindu" . To this jain muni smiled foolishly as if he's being praised whereas his community has been reduced to mere 50 lakhs and has lost their hegemony to hindu hegemony in india . I am sure the hindu priest smirked inside and thought of jain monk "What a fool !" 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not directing the following at Dr. Singh's presentation, because I haven't had the opportunity to view his findings, but from a general perspective are diaspora Sikhs automatically categorised as radicals if they dare to question the accepted Indian narrative of governance? So there's no room for dissent or objection lest that individual suddenly finds him or herself on a watchlist of undesirables? That sounds like the kind of thing the Chinese have been doing for a while.

I won't criticise Dr. Singh's findings because I'm at a loss as to where he's exactly coming from on his chosen subject, but I'll be very interested in his conclusions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I'm not directing the following at Dr. Singh's presentation, because I haven't had the opportunity to view his findings, but from a general perspective are diaspora Sikhs automatically categorised as radicals if they dare to question the accepted Indian narrative of governance? So there's no room for dissent or objection lest that individual suddenly finds him or herself on a watchlist of undesirables? That sounds like the kind of thing the Chinese have been doing for a while.

I won't criticise Dr. Singh's findings because I'm at a loss as to where he's exactly coming from on his chosen subject, but I'll be very interested in his conclusions.

Thesedays you can be labeled khalistani terrorists by a few right-wingers in india for merely saying "Sikhs are not hindus" . Then they will tell you that you hate hindus and you're a khalistani terrorist, then badmouth bhindrawale and so on.

The Indian narrative is pushed into media . No one dares question it. No one, except the few sikhs. And a fringe of hindutva people who say bhindrawale was Indira's creation to uproot akalis in punjab but eventually backfired on her . 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm referring to the incident in Satyug. Durga fought Daints and lost, She fled to the mountains and found Rishi Ji there (Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji in his previous form) and begged him to protect her. She hid in his sanctuary till the Daints came and Guru Sahib summoned Dusht Daman to fight them, he also empowered Durga as she was drained and completely weak so she could fight as well.  As for those parts its referring to what the Trinity Devs started doing. Vishnu told people he was the Supreme Lord God (hence the Vaishnaiv sect formed) and Brahma started calling himself Parbharam (all knowing omniscient), Guru Sahib expands on how they fell to Maya and also failed in their tasks.
    • Now I do agree with you that @singh1606 is probably an RSS Agent, but doesn't Chandi Di Vaar mention how Durga only went to Indra, when Indra was corrupted and lost to the demons? Also as a request due to my limited Gurnukhi knowledge, I understood parts of it, but not this part: ॥ ਬਿਸਨ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਕੋ ਠਹਰਾਯੋ ॥ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਆਪ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਬਖਾਨਾ ॥ , could you explain it in more detail?  (Just to explain how I read it in transliteration): "Bsn ap hi Pa Thjpyh" for the first line.
    • this numbskull clearly hasn't even bothered reading any Gurbani. He's taking verses left right and centre. There was already a verse which said Durga is powerless to give anyone liberation. Brahma,Vishnu and Shiva are not Sikhs loool. They were deluded in the world, they still are. Lost in Maya and subject to death. Give me a break, this dude couldn't be more obvious that he wants Sikhs to start doing Mandir Pooja. I wonder if Preeto called for some backup. ਤੂ ਕਹੀਅਤ ਹੀ ਆਦਿ ਭਵਾਨੀ ॥  Durga can't do anything, She's nothing more than God's handmaiden, and there are millions of her at that too. ਚਰਨ ਸਰਨਿ ਜਿਹ ਬਸਤ ਭਵਾਨੀ ॥
        She runs to his feet, heck She even ran away from battle when Daints overpowered her. Guru Sahib had to summon an army and revitalise her for her to do anything. She couldn't do anything without God and lost all her powers. ਤੇ ਹਮ ਤਮਕਿ ਤਨਿਕ ਮੋ ਖਾਪੇ ॥ ਤਿਨ ਕੀ ਠਉਰ ਦੇਵਤਾ ਥਾਪੇ ॥ ਤੇ ਭੀ ਬਲਿ ਪੂਜਾ ਉਰਝਾਏ ॥ ਆਪਨ ਹੀ ਪਰਮੇਸੁਰ ਕਹਾਏ ॥੭॥ ਮਹਾਦੇਵ ਅਚੁਤ ਕਹਵਾਯੋ ॥ ਬਿਸਨ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਕੋ ਠਹਰਾਯੋ ॥ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਆਪ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਬਖਾਨਾ ॥ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੋ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਨ ਕਿਨਹੂੰ ਜਾਨਾ ॥੮॥
        An amazing bunch of sikhs. I mean really we should all follow their example. Let's all start worshipping power and calling ourselves God. What an amazing bunch of role models.
    • This poster will say anything to divide the Sikh community on anything.  Always ready to swear and insult any side to get an reaction and cause fights on this forum and others.  He's a moni for life and I wish this guy dies a horrible death when he goes.  The amount of fighting he has caused should come back to haunt him on his death bed.  
    • Do you really think the Indian government would comply to a referendum which breaks up India ?