Jump to content
Jonny101

Dhunda VS Dandrianwala

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I'm not involved in any of these parcharik issues. But no one here really knows what he hit. What's it even matter, shield or eye, one would be harder to penetrate, the other much harder to aim for. Both are VERY impressive. Let's be critical over legit issues. Rather than attacking fellow Sikhs over anything. 

Bro I'm not attacking anyone over anything. I grew up on Ranjit Singh's Prachar, he was probably the first person (sikhi wise) who I could sit still and listen to, but from what I know its a recorded historical fact where it hit. Both are very impressive but its better to be as concise as possible.  We shouldn't cut corners with these kind of things.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

F**k you. You're a real piece of work. 

I'm glad you understood how stupid that question was to ask.  Distorting Sikh history is like questioning who your father is.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Akalifauj said:

Why does it matter who your father is?  You should respect your mother either way.

Why you so rude? It is so off putting when you talk. You sound angry miserable stubborn and a kid who tries to act like the badboys. Your language disgusts me you are vile. In most your posts you swear. And then you want people to read/agree to your posts. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kira said:

Bro I'm not attacking anyone over anything. I grew up on Ranjit Singh's Prachar, he was probably the first person (sikhi wise) who I could sit still and listen to, but from what I know its a recorded historical fact where it hit. Both are very impressive but its better to be as concise as possible.  We shouldn't cut corners with these kind of things.

I didn't mean you attacked anyone bro. I don't get your view on this, are you saying it was the shield or eye? Akalifauj is saying shield. 

39 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

I'm glad you understood how stupid that question was to ask.  Distorting Sikh history is like questioning who your father is.  

Both would be very incredible feats. I don't think any is less impressive than the other. Of course if he is saying "pfft he couldn't do that," it's a bit different. It's also pretty ridiculous to think hitting the eye is a joke instead. I didn't even know this was a controversial topic till now, but it was a battle, tons of chaos, who knows. If sources say pierced the shield, great, if eye, great, either way he's got my utmost respect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To your average punjabi 'Sikh', all prachariks etc are pretty much the same... money makers and hypocrites. The fact that Ranjit Singh has managed to get such a big following and bring your average joe into Sikhi is massive, yeah people cuss him but at least he bringing people into Sikhi which is what is needed. Remeber Sant Jarnail Singh Ji used to say that each Amritdhari is a BOMB in the eyes of the GOI. The Taksal, where anyone likes it or not is and has been the forefront of Sikhs. We are doing the Sarkaar's job by disrespecting it. Look at the state propoganda has left the wider Nihang image in? This our time to sambaal the Taksal, otherwise oncoming generations will not respect it and we lose a MASSIVE part of the Khalsa Panth like we practically have with the majority of Nihangs. Whether someone is a shardhaloo of Ranjit Singh or Taksal, if either is bringing someone into Sikhi then its for the greater good of Sikhi. Remeber a Sikh is someone who is always learning, so even if they take Amrit from Parmeshar Diwar or Taksal, the individual should always be learning and take his/her own path towards Waheguru.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

To your average punjabi 'Sikh', all prachariks etc are pretty much the same... money makers and hypocrites. The fact that Ranjit Singh has managed to get such a big following and bring your average joe into Sikhi is massive, yeah people cuss him but at least he bringing people into Sikhi which is what is needed. Remeber Sant Jarnail Singh Ji used to say that each Amritdhari is a BOMB in the eyes of the GOI. The Taksal, where anyone likes it or not is and has been the forefront of Sikhs. We are doing the Sarkaar's job by disrespecting it. Look at the state propoganda has left the wider Nihang image in? This our time to sambaal the Taksal, otherwise oncoming generations will not respect it and we lose a MASSIVE part of the Khalsa Panth like we practically have with the majority of Nihangs. Whether someone is a shardhaloo of Ranjit Singh or Taksal, if either is bringing someone into Sikhi then its for the greater good of Sikhi. Remeber a Sikh is someone who is always learning, so even if they take Amrit from Parmeshar Diwar or Taksal, the individual should always be learning and take his/her own path towards Waheguru.   

I agree to some most of your response ji. However it is not us sangat that have made taksal lose respect. In this context i am referring to curremt taksal (clarifying. Before some call me anti bhindranwale) Dhummas is doing the sarkaars job. He willingly did ardas for badal he willingly fed ladoos it is a joke. 

This is the issue though. So many little self claimed taksalis branches dont speak up because they dont want to 'disrespect taksal'. We need to speak up as it is not the same sant jis taksal. We have ALREADY lost the real taksal. 

Agreed. Need to sambaal taksal but it is too late. Corruption has gone too far. If all sangat agreed to remove dhumma from jathedar post and deal with his actions. Then yes we have hope. 

Sangat who attend diwans are shardhaloo of dhan guru granth sahib ji. Only mehta fans are shardhaloos of dhummas belly. Dhadrianwale have strengthened my sharda towards maharaj only. Not towards themself. 

Yes it is good to do parchar. However the question that sangat have is what is the greater good in killing bhupinder singh. Yes i know you disapprove the killing but how can we look past that and turn to taksal for parchar after such animalistic actions. Some things cannot be forgiven. Yes all dhummas accomplishmemts gave him respect back in the day incl yadgar etc but a lot has happened since then.

 

 

 

Edited by JS79
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×